Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,026 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 06:34 PM Jan 2012

Without Saying His Name The 2012 GOP Field Promises A Return To Bush

Candidates for political office usually rely on their party’s previous office holder as a reference to boast how they will govern should they win their contest. Republicans point to Ronald Reagan as their ideal and they deified the man even though his administration began the country’s decline into corporatism and economic inequity between the rich and poor Americans. None of the Republican candidates for the nomination have singled out George W. Bush as their avatar of hope to return the country to, what is arguably, the darkest days of America, and indeed, they have avoided mentioning Bush like plague. However, each of the presidential hopefuls, at some point, promises to return to Bush-era policies that caused a worldwide economic meltdown and the similarities do not stop at financial malfeasance.

There is a reason no Republican wants to be associated with Bush; two unnecessary and unfunded wars, unfunded tax cuts for the wealthy, ballooning national debt, economic devastation of the population, and unfunded bailouts for banks that caused the economic meltdown all portray Bush’s presidency as a catastrophic failure. Many Republicans lament that everything was not perfect during the Bush years. Rick Perry remarked that “The reason we find ourselves in the problem today is because we had Republicans and Democrats – you couldn’t tell the difference in the way they were spending.” Perry fails to admit that spending during the Bush years was for ill-advised wars, unfunded tax cuts for the wealthy, and an unfunded expensive Medicare drug program that Republicans promoted. Bush and his Republican cronies spent money like drunken, cocaine-fueled frat boys who found their rich daddy’s credit cards. In a 2009 op-ed, high-ranking House Republicans Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan, and Kevin McCarthy said Republicans had “lost their way” and that “by the fall of 2006, it had become abundantly clear that Republicans had severely lost our way. We had significantly increased federal spending.” House Speaker John Boehner has said the same thing: “Republicans lost our way on fiscal responsibility.”

Some Republicans believe Bush’s legacy will be vindicated by history, but the candidates still will not mention him by name. Bush’s former press secretary, Ari Fleischer, said, “Sad to say, they’re looking at polling data that indicates they’re better off not bringing him into the campaign. I think President Bush has made America a safer nation and better nation and I’m proud of it. But politics isn’t about what’s fair, it’s about winning.” But wait, if America is better, safer, and if Bush is a source of pride for Republicans, why are they pretending Bush does not exist? It is simply because Americans remember disastrous neo-conservative foreign and economic policies Bush Republicans followed to destroy the economy and America’s standing in the world. So, have Republicans learned what not to do in governing? In a word; no.

Not only will Republicans take the country back to Bush-era economic and foreign policy disasters, they will go farther than Bush in increasing income inequality, killing jobs and job growth, and increasing the deficit and national debt with multi-trillion dollar tax cuts for the rich and corporations. In case any American doubts the lengths Republicans will go to return to Bush policies, they only need examine the GOP’s drive to repeal every legislative achievement President Obama presided over in two years. Indeed, the policies proposed by the candidates would not only embrace Bush’s failed economic agenda, they would take it to such extremes that the country would never recover.

Read more: http://www.politicususa.com/en/gop-bush-2012

Oh hell no.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Without Saying His Name The 2012 GOP Field Promises A Return To Bush (Original Post) Galraedia Jan 2012 OP
I believe you're correct. CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2012 #1

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,637 posts)
1. I believe you're correct.
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 06:39 PM
Jan 2012

But I also believe they did what they did in order to make the economy fail, so that they could blame it on Obama.

That doesn't mean, of course, that they wouldn't continue to implement those disastrous policies once they were back in office, god forbid.

They don't care of the country never recovers; they'll have theirs and that's all they care about.

Fuck them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Without Saying His Name T...