Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 10:08 AM Mar 2019

Republicans showed themselves to be politically naive in their vote against "national emergency".

If they had been more politically astute, they would have gotten more than the 67 votes needed to over-ride a Trump veto. He would not have gambled with a veto. They could have stopped this process in its tracks.

As it is, there is a good chance that Trump will veto it, believing that less than 67 Senators will vote against him. Yesterday's vote only encouraged him. And Republicans will be back in the same box.

It was a dumb vote by Republicans.

They chose to protect Donald Trump over the Constitution of the United States.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans showed themselves to be politically naive in their vote against "national emergency". (Original Post) kentuck Mar 2019 OP
This has been a Republican Wellstone ruled Mar 2019 #1
They never had any intention of getting 67 votes. TwilightZone Mar 2019 #2
I think you're right. awesomerwb1 Mar 2019 #3
Of course, they had no intention of getting 67 votes... kentuck Mar 2019 #4
Gardner and Tillis voted against it. TwilightZone Mar 2019 #5
Yes, because they thought it would help them in their next election... kentuck Mar 2019 #9
Well, yeah. TwilightZone Mar 2019 #10
I think Trump had a personal conversation with each of them... kentuck Mar 2019 #12
don't miss the upside on this, ALL GOP House members will be placed on the real "record" when beachbum bob Mar 2019 #6
Exactly! kentuck Mar 2019 #13
The 12 GOP senators that defied trump and McConnel really had little choice, the real test beachbum bob Mar 2019 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author spanone Mar 2019 #7
It has become increasingly evident over the past decade that the republicans have no principles. Mr. Sparkle Mar 2019 #8
Nah. They just don't care struggle4progress Mar 2019 #11
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. This has been a Republican
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 10:11 AM
Mar 2019

wish list item since the days of Newt Gingrich and his Contract with America.

Some of those Players are still hanging around screwing up our Country.

TwilightZone

(25,473 posts)
2. They never had any intention of getting 67 votes.
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 10:31 AM
Mar 2019

It was quite carefully planned to allow certain members to vote "Yes" to provide political cover in their upcoming races.

It's not as dumb as you might think. They get to claim that they can be bipartisan without actually doing anything, and they give vulnerable members of their side a talking point for their campaigns.

awesomerwb1

(4,268 posts)
3. I think you're right.
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 10:35 AM
Mar 2019

We underestimate those cockroaches at our own peril. Win win for those Senators from a complicated(for them) position.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
4. Of course, they had no intention of getting 67 votes...
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 10:42 AM
Mar 2019

...and that was their mistake.

They could have gotten 67 votes and Trump would not have threatened a veto. The process would have died. As it is, it lives to haunt them another day.

They get no political cover. Ask Corey Gardner or Thom Tillis. They may think they get political cover but they do not.

TwilightZone

(25,473 posts)
5. Gardner and Tillis voted against it.
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 10:51 AM
Mar 2019

The Rs who voted for it are the ones who got political cover. Many of them are in close races in purple states. The Yes votes allow them to pretend that they're occasionally bipartisan, as I noted, and also pretend that they don't always side with Trump. It's a win/win. They don't actually do anything but they can tell their constituents that they tried.

It's not as complicated as you seem to want to make it.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
9. Yes, because they thought it would help them in their next election...
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 04:05 PM
Mar 2019

...and probably fearful of a primary challenge?

I think their vote was a loser.

TwilightZone

(25,473 posts)
10. Well, yeah.
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 04:36 PM
Mar 2019

That's why it was a little surprising that the two of them voted no. They had the opportunity to provide themselves the same cover the others got but didn't. Tillis seems to have bowed to pressure from Trump. Not sure what Gardner's excuse is.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
12. I think Trump had a personal conversation with each of them...
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 05:42 PM
Mar 2019

..and talked them into voting against their interest and their country.

The Republican Party is in a sad shape.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
6. don't miss the upside on this, ALL GOP House members will be placed on the real "record" when
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 10:56 AM
Mar 2019

they have to vote on the override...many "hid" behind their no vote as they knew it was going to pass regardless. So now we will have every single GOP'er on the record with the override vote.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
13. Exactly!
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 05:44 PM
Mar 2019

That was the point I was trying to make. They maybe could have prevented the veto from Trump if they had voted right this time. Now they have nowhere to hide. They will have to defend their votes.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
14. The 12 GOP senators that defied trump and McConnel really had little choice, the real test
Sat Mar 16, 2019, 07:02 AM
Mar 2019

comes soon with the veto override vote in the House and Senate.

no more hiding. 2020 issues being made every day. In the upcoming election if I had my own superpac, I would run independent ads against all GOP'ers you refused to override the trump's veto with an ad that says "X" failed to protect the constitution and will allow the next president unsurpassed power to do what they please....

Response to kentuck (Original post)

Mr. Sparkle

(2,940 posts)
8. It has become increasingly evident over the past decade that the republicans have no principles.
Fri Mar 15, 2019, 11:38 AM
Mar 2019

If you asked me what does the republican party stand for i would have to say they are a party of trolls, they are against things that the democrats stand for, and by and large, it is to fund raise off those positions that's we hold.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans showed themse...