Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

George II

(67,782 posts)
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 10:44 AM Mar 2019

Supreme Court ruling in Sandy Hook case could reveal gun manufacturer's confidential marketing....

(note: this is the Connecticut Supreme Court)

Supreme Court ruling in Sandy Hook case could reveal gun manufacturer’s confidential marketing strategy for semiautomaic firearms

From the day they stood together to announce their lawsuit in their Bridgeport attorney’s office four years ago, a group of Sandy Hook parents have said the same thing — all they wanted was to learn about the marketing strategy behind the Remington semiautomatic rifle used to kill their children.

Facing what seemed liked impenetrable Congressional protection for the gun industry, the odds grew longer when a state judge threw the case out. But last week’s stunning state Supreme Court ruling allowing the case to proceed has increased their chances of getting access to secret marketing documents that gun manufacturers like Remington have fought hard to protect.

“We’re not starting from a completely blank slate here. You don’t get to a marketing campaign like they have had targeting young men that wasn’t well thought out,” said Josh Koskoff, lawyer for the Sandy Hook families. “These families weren’t the target audience for Remington. The Sandy Hook shooter was their target. He was in the crosshairs of their marketing campaign, and he knew a lot about what that gun could do.”

The state Supreme Court, by a narrow margin, remanded the gun case back to Bridgeport Superior Court — a ruling that paves the way for the families to subpoena internal documents on how the gun companies have marketed the AR-15, which has become the weapon of choice for mass shooters. The gun manufacturers have closely guarded information on how they market the assault weapons.

https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-sandy-hook-gun-case-folo-20190317-hq77kvcvrzczze2bno74ousz64-story.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lapucelle

(18,311 posts)
1. Undoing the congressional protections for gun manufacturers is part of our 2016 platform.
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 10:52 AM
Mar 2019

I'm looking forward to this being discussed in the debates.

We can respect the rights of responsible gun owners while keeping our communities safe. To build on the success of the lifesaving Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, we will expand and strengthen background checks and close dangerous loopholes in our current laws; repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) to revoke the dangerous legal immunity protections gun makers and sellers now enjoy; and keep weapons of war—such as assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines (LCAM’s)—off our streets.

lapucelle

(18,311 posts)
3. I'm always amazed at what some people don't know about the 2016 platform.
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 11:13 AM
Mar 2019

When I look at that document and think of what could have been accomplished at this point, and then factor in all the new stuff that must be undone, and all the other stuff that can't be undone...

...well, I just SMH.

We must ensure that the repeal of the gun manufacturers loophole remains a plank in our 2020 platform.

George II

(67,782 posts)
6. It's embarrassing to know that many of the major gun manufacturers in this country...
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 12:46 PM
Mar 2019

....are in Connecticut or had their roots in Connecticut:

Colt
Smith and Wesson
Remington (Bushmaster)
Winchester
Ruger
Sturm
Mossberg

and about a dozen small manufacturers. Thankfully with the tightened gun laws after the Sandy Hook massacre, some of them have moved down south. Interestingly there was no effort to prevent them from moving like there is for companies in other industries.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
4. Any company that profits from guns and/or advertises gunz like this, should be subject to law suits.
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 12:26 PM
Mar 2019

Worse, they contribute to lobbying efforts by white wing organizations like the NRA.


?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale

aikoaiko

(34,183 posts)
5. I'm certain they want to do more than learn about marketing. LOL
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 12:29 PM
Mar 2019

Like sue gun manufacturers into nonexistence.

DVRacer

(707 posts)
7. It maybe unpopular to hear but
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 07:21 PM
Mar 2019

The families are going to lose this lawsuit and end up owing the defendants for legal fees just like Aurora. First line of defense will be he stole the rifle to begin with and Remington group never sold him anything. That will end up a hurdle too high to overcome. The mere fact of the theft will immunize them from liability, how can you sue a manufacturer of an item that was stolen and then used in the commission of a crime?

I know that’s not what some may not want to hear but this is going to cost these families more heartache in the end.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court ruling in S...