Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(59,187 posts)
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 03:04 PM Mar 2019

Trump's 2020 map from hell

Recent polling in a slew of states that carried President Trump to his thin win in 2016 show him starting 2020 in a deep hole.

What's new: Based on demographic changes, Republicans for the first time have authentic worries about Arizona, Georgia, Texas and other states they once took for granted.

From the north: Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are harder this time because Hillary Clinton, a turnoff for many working-class voters, won't be on the ballot.

From the south: Demographics are making North Carolina, Georgia, Texas and Arizona more competitive, and realistically in play.

That's part of the reason for the fascination with more centrist Democrats like Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Beto O'Rourke and Joe Biden: The states that Trump won, but could easily lose, are swingy — not super-liberal.
Among the holes in his 2016 map:

In Wisconsin, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel wrote after a statewide poll in January that Trump "has a precarious path to victory," based on the facts that his job approval was just 44%, opposition was more intense than support, and Democrats were more unified than Republicans.

In Michigan, the Detroit Free Press reports that Trump faces "serious headwinds": "Less than half of likely voters believe he’s doing a good job, according to some recent polls, and many, if not most, plan to vote for someone else."

"Pennsylvania meltdown triggers Republican alarms," Politico wrote after the midterms. "A GOP collapse threatens to torpedo Donald Trump’s re-election prospects."




https://www.axios.com/trump-2020-election-map-swing-states-80f9aab1-e713-4c7d-a72a-24f3a87beb13.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's 2020 map from hell (Original Post) RandySF Mar 2019 OP
I have heard that before exboyfil Mar 2019 #1
History favors incumbent presidents. RandySF Mar 2019 #2
Tell that to edhopper Mar 2019 #6
That's two in the past how many years? RandySF Mar 2019 #8
2 out of four edhopper Mar 2019 #9
So Bush Carter abd then you have to go back to Hoover RandySF Mar 2019 #10
For someone this upopular edhopper Mar 2019 #11
Um, that article is from 2016 GaYellowDawg Mar 2019 #3
Thank you RhodeIslandOne Mar 2019 #12
Ya' know.......... MyOwnPeace Mar 2019 #4
Fuck Axios Maven Mar 2019 #5
This edhopper Mar 2019 #7

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
1. I have heard that before
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 03:25 PM
Mar 2019

Nate Silver's model gives Trump an unusually high chance of winning. Could he be right?
https://www.vox.com/2016/11/3/13147678/nate-silver-fivethirtyeight-trump-forecast

Liberals have tried to comfort themselves with the knowledge that FiveThirtyEight is an outlier among the six major forecasts, and that the other five give Trump between a 16 percent and a sub-1 percent chance of winning.

edhopper

(33,614 posts)
9. 2 out of four
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 10:26 PM
Mar 2019

Trump is the least popular incompant in decades running for a second term

If he won again, it would be without the popular vote...again.

MyOwnPeace

(16,937 posts)
4. Ya' know..........
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 04:17 PM
Mar 2019

you would love to believe it, but the way SO many sources are doing the "equal coverage" thing, as well as providing shaky data, it is so hard to know who to believe anymore. And it seems that some of the "dependable" sources are changing their own stance/position daily (depending on their advertising revenue?).
Oh, and then there's this: the actual election is a year and a half away!

Maven

(10,533 posts)
5. Fuck Axios
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 08:28 PM
Mar 2019

"...because Hillary Clinton, a turnoff for many working-class voters..."

First of all, I think that you mean white working class. Secondly, Trump's voters skewed wealthier than HRC's. Thirdly, it's in no small part due to hacky journalism bros at places like Axios (and its precursor, Politico) parroting "Hillary is unlikeable" that many working-class voters voted for someone who is a parasite and fraudster who sees them as nothing but marks to be exploited. Seriously Axios, fuck you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's 2020 map from hel...