Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere will be no further indictments from the special counsel
There will be no further indictments from the special counsel, a senior Justice Department official said!
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/22/politics/robert-mueller-report/index.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 566 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There will be no further indictments from the special counsel (Original Post)
USALiberal
Mar 2019
OP
That does not mean no further indictments - only none from the Special Counsel's Office. nt
Xipe Totec
Mar 2019
#1
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)1. That does not mean no further indictments - only none from the Special Counsel's Office. nt
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)2. Keywords being "from the special counsel"
Who, as well all know, has turned over many legs of this investigation to other agencies. This is far from over, and anybody that tells you otherwise is either a fool or a troll.
imaginary girl
(863 posts)3. Sealed indictments?
No further indictments is not the same as unsealing sealed indictments, correct?
bitterross
(4,066 posts)4. Interesting point. I would like to think so but...
I am thinking he stuck to indictments close to the Russian thing and referred everything else to others. That's a good way to avoid the indictments being challenged because they were "not in his mandate" Even though they were really.