Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 10:35 PM Mar 2019

Could the DU posters who have declared ...

… that Mueller’s report is a “bust”, a “nothing burger”, etc., please enlighten the rest of us as to exactly what the report says? I’d hate to think people are posting such things without knowing what the report actually contains, so perhaps they could provide the facts they’ve learned – along with an explanation of how they are in possession of those facts.

I also wonder why some posters are insisting that Mueller has “exonerated” or “vindicated” Trump. I know that’s what is being said by the usual GOP spokes-whores in the media, but since when do they tell the truth? And more to the point, they don’t know what’s in the report either.

Of course they’re going to spin this into some kind of victory for Trump – just like they do everything else. So why are these bullshitters being taken seriously now, after two years of being proven to have misled the public, or out-and-lied about everything this “pResident” has said and done?

This isn’t over – not by a long-shot. There are ongoing investigations, as we’ve learned from Mueller himself, and Trump and his cabal are far from out of the woods. In fact, because other indictments are probable in jurisdictions where a presidential pardon is not possible, many of them are facing worse jeopardy than they faced from Mueller’s team.

There is also the fact that our newly-elected Democratic majority in the House is only beginning their oversight investigations, and have a much broader mandate than Mueller had. That does not bode well for Spanky & His Gang by any stretch of the imagination.

I find it rather amazing that the fat lady hasn’t even begun to sing, and some here are already fleeing the theatre, having declared her performance a complete failure.


137 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could the DU posters who have declared ... (Original Post) NanceGreggs Mar 2019 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author sfwriter Mar 2019 #1
And she's got a very impressive group ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #2
The minute he no longer has the protection of that Wh Eliot Rosewater Mar 2019 #7
And given everything that's been exposed ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #10
US banks had already blacklisted Trump. That's why he went to the Russians in the first place. Nitram Mar 2019 #108
The Saudis will dump him and Kushner too once he's out of office. SayItLoud Mar 2019 #135
Just like George Bush fescuerescue Mar 2019 #100
I've missed seeing Bush indicted for any crimes oldsoftie Mar 2019 #119
exactly fescuerescue Mar 2019 #123
Oh, ok. I never bought into any of that, but Trumps issues will be scams before being president. oldsoftie Mar 2019 #124
Well said Nance. If the Mueller report was a whitewash there'd be a hell of rzemanfl Mar 2019 #3
Trumps will continue saying what they said all along. Funny.there are a lot of witches in jail. onit2day Mar 2019 #40
"I'm a great Christian" czarjak Mar 2019 #46
a few witches. Hopefully soon a lot. Right now it's just a few mucifer Mar 2019 #82
They wouldn't be taking so much care previewing and redacting it forgotmylogin Mar 2019 #53
It is odd. We literally don't know what the report says. manor321 Mar 2019 #4
We do know that several of Trump's team are serving time, many more fled indictment onit2day Mar 2019 #37
We do not know anything of the sort. Jakes Progress Mar 2019 #90
They honestly convinced themselves Codeine Mar 2019 #5
Agreed. NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #13
Yes. WheelWalker Mar 2019 #26
Sorry, but I didn't see any of that here. Guess I missed it onit2day Mar 2019 #39
Many are the same who regularly post that rump is "done" on a regular basis. Tipperary Mar 2019 #81
I've been waiting on threads for answers to those questions. blm Mar 2019 #6
We already have Trump on 3 imeachable offenses. Obstruction, Campaign finance violations and onit2day Mar 2019 #30
Mme Speaker can count to 67. Can you? Hekate Mar 2019 #54
The ultimate consideration DFW Mar 2019 #61
Completely agree Hekate Mar 2019 #63
+ a million or so! eom BlueMTexpat Mar 2019 #68
Pelosi is text book wrong seeing Nixon didn't have FAUX News, if this is a poltiical matter then we uponit7771 Mar 2019 #71
Actually Nixon WANTED his own version DFW Mar 2019 #74
WOW !! The KGOP has always been up in Russia's ass. Now that the KGOP has a mouth piece Red Dons uponit7771 Mar 2019 #75
I think it was more admiration from afar for a long while DFW Mar 2019 #78
Logical, practical, non-emotional thoughts! +10 at140 Mar 2019 #103
Need more than 67 for impeachment ... you're intimating removal which has nothing to do with impeach uponit7771 Mar 2019 #69
Aw naw man unless it fulfills my desire its a Eko Mar 2019 #8
As far as i am concerned tiredtoo Mar 2019 #9
Boggles my mind. sheshe2 Mar 2019 #11
i think mueller handed everthing over to NY for pardon proof state charges Takket Mar 2019 #12
The one thing we WILL know madamesilverspurs Mar 2019 #14
I have heard today that it is either... BigmanPigman Mar 2019 #15
i guess DU is not the place to share worries and or concerns for fear of being less than.... nt Ninga Mar 2019 #16
There is a very distinct difference ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #20
so true Nance... chillfactor Mar 2019 #29
If you do, you will catch holy hell. Jakes Progress Mar 2019 #91
Amen Nance! chillfactor Mar 2019 #17
Thank you for your post Nance .... CatMor Mar 2019 #18
Not one person was indicted for conspiring with Russia theboss Mar 2019 #19
What about all those Russians who were indicted? Maria Buttina is in prison last I looked. Hekate Mar 2019 #55
It's fairly settled that Russia tried to mess with the election FBaggins Mar 2019 #76
Exactly. And trump is too stupid to understand what you just wrote. oldsoftie Mar 2019 #120
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #130
As someone said when I used the same metaphor Maeve Mar 2019 #21
I'll give it a shot (again) Jarqui Mar 2019 #22
Just don't think about that stuff. Jakes Progress Mar 2019 #92
I'm just facing some facts Jarqui Mar 2019 #95
I'm on your side. Jakes Progress Mar 2019 #104
My head is spinning with many questions that I fear will remain unanswered Jarqui Mar 2019 #105
I can tell you what the mueller report says DirtEdonE Mar 2019 #23
Such a declaration would be a waste of time ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #25
Then what makes anyone believe this is any different? DirtEdonE Mar 2019 #28
The point of the OP is that nobody knows what's in the report, including me and you. Lock him up. Mar 2019 #42
And it misses the point FBaggins Mar 2019 #77
Don't hold your breath waiting for justice DirtEdonE Mar 2019 #85
PS sheilahi Mar 2019 #88
Lol, so you are the expert, no one else is? Nt USALiberal Mar 2019 #24
Her point was pretty clearly that none of us is an expert. TwilightZone Mar 2019 #27
Oh, there are lots of experts here. NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #32
Amazing how people forget this is a fucking discussion board! Nt USALiberal Mar 2019 #34
And exactly what ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #38
Post removed Post removed Mar 2019 #131
Yeah ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #133
Well you are! He just didn't hang around long enough to learn that. marble falls Mar 2019 #137
what is with you tonight? chillfactor Mar 2019 #33
I'm tired of posters telling people how to react! Nt USALiberal Mar 2019 #35
"Amazing how people forget this is a fucking discussion board! Nt" TwilightZone Mar 2019 #36
No one is telling anyone how to react. NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #51
Take a deep breath dude. Go for a walk. Watch Netflix. Read a book. Tipperary Mar 2019 #83
I think "No further indictments" pretty much tells us something about the report. Hoyt Mar 2019 #31
"This" should ... NOT ... be impeachment seeing he's on its face violating emoluments clauses as uponit7771 Mar 2019 #72
So alternative is to try Impeachment in House, hope that goes well, and watch it die in Senate. Hoyt Mar 2019 #87
No, impeachment in the house then that's it and "looking like losers" is what's going to happen any uponit7771 Mar 2019 #97
Unless something is unexpected in report, we will lose right about Nov 2020. Hoyt Mar 2019 #102
Floating 35 - 45 means they should be losers. Lock him up. Mar 2019 #112
+1 uponit7771 Mar 2019 #115
Once I cited a snippet of law to a paralegal. Igel Mar 2019 #132
I think some people were expecting BlueFlorida Mar 2019 #41
Undoubtedly that's true. NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #43
The fat man is warming up their voice. Give it a few days and you will be back here removing this th lancelyons Mar 2019 #44
I've been posting on DU for over a decade. NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #48
So you go back and remove your threads if something changes? Hekate Mar 2019 #56
Huh? oldsoftie Mar 2019 #122
I will wait to read the report Gothmog Mar 2019 #45
Why would you think that's ever going to happen? mr_lebowski Mar 2019 #59
Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2019 #47
Yeah, fuck all that. I'm happy. The next few months are just the beginning of the end. ancianita Mar 2019 #49
When we've spent 2 years sharing Mueller memes equating him with God... Yeah it's disappointing. MadDAsHell Mar 2019 #50
This +1000 Azathoth Mar 2019 #57
nods "we are our own worst enemy" DonCoquixote Mar 2019 #52
Spot on, Nance Hekate Mar 2019 #58
It's pretty simple. Absent new indictments, the only thing left is political action by Congress Azathoth Mar 2019 #60
I'll bring the fat lady's cigar. akraven Mar 2019 #62
The Mueller investigation is only going after ''Russian collusion'' if I'm not wrong. YOHABLO Mar 2019 #64
No, there were multiple elements to it besides collusion Seth Abrams has a good thread on why this uponit7771 Mar 2019 #73
It's tough to argue he was only going after Russian collusion when hughee99 Mar 2019 #101
Exactly Sunsky Mar 2019 #65
sure. i can sum it up in one word. flynn Kurt V. Mar 2019 #66
And then there are the Sealioning concern trolls lunatica Mar 2019 #67
Could you send this to M$Greedia as well malaise Mar 2019 #70
Very well put! nightwing1240 Mar 2019 #79
The power of DU is that it is a place where those, myself included, who have anxiety about the mfcorey1 Mar 2019 #80
Thank you. For those not want to panic to extend a bit of understanding to those of us who Ninga Mar 2019 #86
I think the OP is trying to speak on behalf of 252,000 other registered users. MadDAsHell Mar 2019 #89
I am only speaking on behalf of myself ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #128
But, but. That is such a buzz kill. Jakes Progress Mar 2019 #94
News Flash! True Blue American Mar 2019 #84
From the Hoarse Whisperer Gothmog Mar 2019 #93
Good question? I'm not seeing anyone doing that, though. MineralMan Mar 2019 #96
Whatever is in the report, and none of us here yet know, it will of Enoki33 Mar 2019 #98
Exactly. And go out register new young voters. Lock him up. Mar 2019 #113
No one here knows whats in it fescuerescue Mar 2019 #99
Savior syndrome. Some are looking for a hero to save them. gtar100 Mar 2019 #106
Anybody who claims know anything in the report before it has been publicly released is talking out Nitram Mar 2019 #107
Here's hoping that for Spanky & His Gang Sunday will never be the same. JudyM Mar 2019 #109
... Different Drummer Mar 2019 #111
Some DUers require anti-depressants, others need vodka and borscht IronLionZion Mar 2019 #110
It seems that no-one has read Seth Abramson's lengthy series of tweets: Ford_Prefect Mar 2019 #114
Seth Abramson is attempting damage control on an issue he's invested in Azathoth Mar 2019 #116
You appear to know the hearts of the DOJ, the FBI, The SDNY Prosecutor, the NY AG and Congress. Ford_Prefect Mar 2019 #118
This battle is over. The war is long from over. Initech Mar 2019 #117
Excuse me but garybeck Mar 2019 #121
Thank you NanceGreggs bdamomma Mar 2019 #125
James Carville Syndrome? wiley Mar 2019 #126
We know trump is filthy the way we knew Gotti was filthy EleanorR Mar 2019 #127
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2019 #129
If it exonerated trump it would be public already. mountain grammy Mar 2019 #134
Barr will release the report... Oldtimeralso Mar 2019 #136

Response to NanceGreggs (Original post)

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
10. And given everything that's been exposed ...
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:00 PM
Mar 2019

... about Spanky's business dealings, it's not like he can go back to his old day job.

Even the most corrupt people in the NY real estate biz don't want to deal with someone they know regulators and the IRS are going to be scrutinizing from here on in.

Of course, Spanky is stupid enough to think his buddy Vlad will come through with the Trump Moscow Tower deal - which was never going to happen anyway.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
123. exactly
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 07:07 PM
Mar 2019

Point is, once a President isn't President anymore, nobody cares and everything stops.

During Bush's reign there was lots similar discussions as to today. Lots of people were hoping for indictments and even being taken to the Hague after he left.

oldsoftie

(12,584 posts)
124. Oh, ok. I never bought into any of that, but Trumps issues will be scams before being president.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 07:18 PM
Mar 2019

Although i agree with you that he's unlikely to go to jail. He'd be old as hell before any trial would be held. But to him, the humiliation of a trail & being found guilty is almost as bad as him going to jail. The dirty laundry being aired.

rzemanfl

(29,566 posts)
3. Well said Nance. If the Mueller report was a whitewash there'd be a hell of
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 10:42 PM
Mar 2019

lot of people keeping a hell of a lot of secrets. K&R.

 

onit2day

(1,201 posts)
40. Trumps will continue saying what they said all along. Funny.there are a lot of witches in jail.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:48 PM
Mar 2019

forgotmylogin

(7,530 posts)
53. They wouldn't be taking so much care previewing and redacting it
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:53 AM
Mar 2019

if it were a "nothingburger".

If it were supportive of 45 you'd already be able to order it on Amazon.

 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
4. It is odd. We literally don't know what the report says.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 10:44 PM
Mar 2019

And we know the White House didn't know by late this afternoon either.

 

onit2day

(1,201 posts)
37. We do know that several of Trump's team are serving time, many more fled indictment
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:43 PM
Mar 2019

Mueller's report is just another nail in the coffin, not a catch all. He's done a great job already making the Russian attack public and accountable but this report is not necessary to impeach. As I said further down we have Trump on 3 impeachable offenses already.

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
90. We do not know anything of the sort.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:40 AM
Mar 2019

We know that WH loyalists said that the WH didn't know. How honest you you really think these monsters are?

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
5. They honestly convinced themselves
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 10:44 PM
Mar 2019

that Trump and his whole family would be indicted. That this flies in the face of political and legal reality doesn't matter, they were CONVINCED on a very personal, visceral level.

That kind of emotional buy-in exacts a price if it doesn’t come to fruition, and we’re seeing that peculiar bit of psychology playing out in real time.

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
13. Agreed.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:06 PM
Mar 2019

And then there are those who have been waiting in the wings to declare Mueller's report a "bust" no matter what it said. I think we're seeing a lot of that going around tonight.

 

Tipperary

(6,930 posts)
81. Many are the same who regularly post that rump is "done" on a regular basis.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 07:24 AM
Mar 2019

I will believe he is done when his orange stain has left the building.

 

onit2day

(1,201 posts)
30. We already have Trump on 3 imeachable offenses. Obstruction, Campaign finance violations and
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:35 PM
Mar 2019

violating the emoluments clause. We must not wait to impeach. More will come after we open impeachment hearings. Pelosi must start holding presidents accountable or history will keep repeating itself and we might lose the House again for refusing to stand up for the law.

DFW

(54,432 posts)
61. The ultimate consideration
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 01:57 AM
Mar 2019

The point of an impeachment is either as a political embassment and distraction (Clinton) or a genuine attempt at removal from office, which would be the case with Trump, since it is impossible to embarrass him, and with his attention span of 30 seconds, he is already incapable of distraction.

Since Trump is immune to the two things Hyde tried to accomplish with Clinton (who left office with a very high approval rating after his Senate exoneration, by the way), the effect of his inevitable exoneration in the Senate would be to allow him to strut like a peacock after the "failed witch hunt" for the rest of his term and vindicate him in the eyes of his Foxsucking followers.

Much as I would like to see him impeached, I only want to see it if there is likelihood of conviction and removal from office (and Pence along with him as soon as Trump is escorted out of 1600). If all it will mean is that he can strut for his last year in office as the Wronged Warrior of the Right, then Pelosi is right: he isn't worth it.

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
71. Pelosi is text book wrong seeing Nixon didn't have FAUX News, if this is a poltiical matter then we
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 05:53 AM
Mar 2019

... have a king every time a republican is in office seeing their poll numbers will never get down to Nixon level because there will be a mouth piece supporting the republican president.

No, that's wrong on its face ... there's no elected king in this country due to them having their own political mouth piece in FAUX News.

DFW

(54,432 posts)
74. Actually Nixon WANTED his own version
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:03 AM
Mar 2019

Last edited Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:09 PM - Edit history (1)

Roger Ailes was part of the Nixon White House, and to counterbalance the "libbrul" press and consistent mocking of Nixon on CBS (Smothers Brothers, e.g.) and NBC (Laugh In, e.g.), Ailes wanted a White House TV news channel, Soviet style. The idea was nixed, but Ailes never let it go completely. During the Clinton presidency, Murdoch and Ailes came up with the idea of a Republican TV "news" channel, and so Fox was born. The concept of one ruling party controlling the media so appealed to them ("Anti-kommanism" is myth, there is no party more like the CPUSSR than the Republicans), that they set about following the example of their Soviet role models, constrained only by that pesky First Amendment that they couldn't find a way to repeal.

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
75. WOW !! The KGOP has always been up in Russia's ass. Now that the KGOP has a mouth piece Red Dons
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:08 AM
Mar 2019

... polling will always float 10% above where a despots is supposed to be.

DFW

(54,432 posts)
78. I think it was more admiration from afar for a long while
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:26 AM
Mar 2019

Totalitarian-minded people (Ailes, e.g.) always admire totalitarian regimes that are solidly entrenched in power. In the Nixon era, the Soviet Union seemed like it would last forever.

Republicans may not understand exactly WHY they are so hated, but they are certainly dimly aware of it, and so feel the need to suppress criticism. There are insecurities that need to be assuaged, after all.

The Nixon Republicans knew how much they were despised, and they wanted to turn the tide of public opinion. The easiest way to do that is make sure the public HAS no other opinion than their own. To do that, you need to control the media. Go to some small town where the only TV station you see shown anywhere is Fox "News," and guess how that town votes? It does work.

at140

(6,110 posts)
103. Logical, practical, non-emotional thoughts! +10
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:07 PM
Mar 2019

Focus should be on defeating Trump in 2020, not on impeachment+removal, which has very low odds of happening with the 53-47 senate. Best to spend energy where a return on investment is most likely.

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
69. Need more than 67 for impeachment ... you're intimating removal which has nothing to do with impeach
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 05:49 AM
Mar 2019

... ment.

A president can be impeached and not removed, rule of law needs to be aherred to or just let folk like the Trumps get away with some sick crap

tiredtoo

(2,949 posts)
9. As far as i am concerned
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 10:58 PM
Mar 2019

Just the principal conclusions would be adequate. No additional indictments from Mueller suggests there may be some work to be done in state courts and possibly sdny.
Satisfactory to me.

sheshe2

(83,846 posts)
11. Boggles my mind.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:00 PM
Mar 2019

This has been years in the making and will take a long time to unravel it all. People will be going to jail out of the reach of a pardon.

History will tell the whole story.

Takket

(21,609 posts)
12. i think mueller handed everthing over to NY for pardon proof state charges
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:04 PM
Mar 2019

or he's leaving it to DOJ and congress to impeach/remove/indict.

he most certainly has not "exonerated" drumpf. keep in mind he made deals with flynn and cohen for lesser sentences. prosecutors don't make deals unless they are getting something in return.

madamesilverspurs

(15,806 posts)
14. The one thing we WILL know
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:08 PM
Mar 2019

by the end of this weekend is whether or not Barr is an honorable man. The rest is yet to happen.

.

BigmanPigman

(51,623 posts)
15. I have heard today that it is either...
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:10 PM
Mar 2019

1. The end of the beginning

OR

2. The beginning of the end

...depending on who you listen to.

I tend to lean toward ...

3. The middle (at least for now I feel that we are smack in the middle...DAMN...my nerves are shot).

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
20. There is a very distinct difference ...
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:14 PM
Mar 2019

... between "sharing worries and concerns" and yelling, "Game over, man - GAME OVER!"

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
91. If you do, you will catch holy hell.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:43 AM
Mar 2019

Don't worry. Be happy. Ignore reality. Don't rain on the parade. They have umbrellas anyway.

chillfactor

(7,580 posts)
17. Amen Nance!
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:12 PM
Mar 2019

Thank you for the post! Some here freaking out about nothing with investigations in state AG hands, House investigations just getting started, and no one yet knows what is in the Mueller report. Damn I just wish some DUers would just settle down instead of freaking out!

 

theboss

(10,491 posts)
19. Not one person was indicted for conspiring with Russia
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:13 PM
Mar 2019

So....that’s an issue.

Other stuff came up. We know more about how Trump runs his world now. But we always knew he ran his company like the mafia.

Hekate

(90,769 posts)
55. What about all those Russians who were indicted? Maria Buttina is in prison last I looked.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 01:32 AM
Mar 2019

Seriously.

FBaggins

(26,756 posts)
76. It's fairly settled that Russia tried to mess with the election
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:20 AM
Mar 2019

Chances are pretty good that they’ve been doing so for years.

But without a clear connection to Trump showing that they were part of his campaign strategy? They don’t matter.

oldsoftie

(12,584 posts)
120. Exactly. And trump is too stupid to understand what you just wrote.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:45 PM
Mar 2019

He thinks that acknowledging russian interference is the same as admitting he was working with them

Response to Hekate (Reply #55)

Maeve

(42,287 posts)
21. As someone said when I used the same metaphor
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:16 PM
Mar 2019

The audience hasn't even been fully seated.

This is just the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end.

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
22. I'll give it a shot (again)
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:20 PM
Mar 2019

Rosenstein letter to Grassley
https://www.justice.gov/ola/page/file/1080041/download

"We also have a duty to prevent the disclosure of information that would unfairly tarnish people who are not charged with crimes."


Barr is not going to photocopy Mueller's report and hand it out. He is going to adhere to department policy and significantly edit it per Rosenstein's letter. Mueller will explain to Barr why he did not indict certain people in his report but department policy per Rosenstein is the public won't get that.

Further, Trump's lawyers will stop it based on scouring for executive privilege.

There are no new or further sealed indictments coming from Mueller - according to several media sources. So his report that we will see after Trump & Barr have scrubbed it will cover generalities and the specific indictments we already know about.

All the folks who have control over this are with the GOP including the President of the United States.
I think it is naive to expect any less than something like the above. They've laid it all out and will point to it. "Those are the rules for the Special Counsel's report we told Grassley about nearly a year ago. Why are you surprised now?"

The disappointment is not with what Mueller wrote - I haven't seen it. The disappointment is with the filters on reducing what we'll be allowed to see and the impact of no further indictments on what we'll be able to read - not much additional in that regard. What can they say about Trump and his kids? They're not being indicted by Mueller so they can say little to nothing about them. Is it sinking in yet?

The automatic response will be: yes, but the Democrats control the House. That's true and that's good. But brace yourself for a court fight over executive privilege and prying the evidence from Barr (he's a GOP prick that helped pardon Iran Contra crooks).

Yes, I haven't seen the report but I can see all the fence posts, barbed wire, administration power and lawyers that are in the way of me ever seeing it.

That is what has sucked the wind out of my sails. I wish I was wrong but I doubt I'm too far off.

EDIT: the thought of Guiliani's, Trump's and Trump, Jr's reaction if i'm right is sickening.

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
92. Just don't think about that stuff.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:45 AM
Mar 2019

It's a bummer. You will wreck brunch joy for so many with that kind of logical and reasoned thinking.

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
95. I'm just facing some facts
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:39 AM
Mar 2019

I don't mean to wreck joy.
There were a number in the media saying things that are simply not likely to come to pass with this report - probably giving false hope or impressions.
If folks don't get too high, they won't crash so hard.

Jakes Progress

(11,122 posts)
104. I'm on your side.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:21 PM
Mar 2019

That there aren't a dozen more of the traitorous bastards in jail by now is depressing. Plus I think trump has had the report for at least a week. I think anything that they tell you is a lie.

My post in reply to yours was meant to be a satire of the pollyanna posts we keep seeing here on this thread. Sorry I didn't include the sarcasm emoticon.

Your concern is reasoned and well-supported. The unfounded glee we see on DU today is just cock-eyed optimism run rampant - sort of the way it was in November of 2016.

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
105. My head is spinning with many questions that I fear will remain unanswered
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:34 PM
Mar 2019

For example
- why did Manafort give campaign data to the Russians and not get held to account?
- why did the NRA appear to get Russian money and coordinate ads with the Trump campaign with it?
- why were there over 100 contacts with the Trump campaign and the Russians?
- what about the reports of Russian money getting into GOP campaigns?
- why all the lying by nearly everyone about the Russians?
- what about the audio tape of Paul Ryan and GOPers laughing about Trump & Rohrabacher being paid by Putin?
etc

The Americans people not getting answers to those questions in this report because no one was indicted for those things. Not getting those answers and answers to questions like them will be an outrage.

Trump and his folks and FOX News may well celebrate no more Mueller indictments but if folks don't get clear answers, this thing is going to start to stink real bad and that stench will follow them right into the voting booths across the country.

 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
23. I can tell you what the mueller report says
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:23 PM
Mar 2019

The mueller report says you can never trust any godam repubican.

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
25. Such a declaration would be a waste of time ...
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:26 PM
Mar 2019

... as most people with a functioning brain have known that for decades.

 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
28. Then what makes anyone believe this is any different?
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:30 PM
Mar 2019

mueller just handed 2020 to trump. Nothing has been done to prevent a repeat of 2016. mueller was our last hope and everyone knows it. Now this bullshit news dump no indictment after TWO YEARS of waiting and hoping.

We're done. It's over. There will be no indictments other than the few low level clowns already charged. This report will be another Warren Report, another Iran Contra - nothing will be done and we'll all go along as if none of this ever happened. Just like before. Just like always.

Lock him up.

(6,939 posts)
42. The point of the OP is that nobody knows what's in the report, including me and you.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:54 PM
Mar 2019

You jump to no indictment(s), and from there you jump to a defeat on November 3, 2020, without knowing if Mueller recommends indictments or not, and if not, why he chose not to bring indictments, or if the House investigations will reveal the crimes of the orange mob boss and his corrupt family or not (THEY WILL). That's two big jumps based on a report nobody knows its contents (yet).

 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
85. Don't hold your breath waiting for justice
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 08:09 AM
Mar 2019

I've seen this act a few times before. When it goes on this long this far past the point of absurdity, nothing is going to happen.

It's all a kabuki show at this point.

sheilahi

(277 posts)
88. PS
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:14 AM
Mar 2019

When the report is made public we'll see that in the middle of all the legalese, Trump is a fat, whiny, lying, cheating, con man third grader that has turned assholery into a science. But we already knew that, didn't we?

TwilightZone

(25,473 posts)
27. Her point was pretty clearly that none of us is an expert.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:30 PM
Mar 2019

Because we know nothing about the report or its conclusions or recommendations.

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
32. Oh, there are lots of experts here.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:35 PM
Mar 2019

They're experts at knowing that declaring what's contained in a report that no one has seen yet is a dumbass move.

The verdict is in: When you have absolutely no way of knowing what a report says, you make a fool of yourself when you insist that you DO know.

I thought that was pretty obvious.

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
38. And exactly what ...
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:45 PM
Mar 2019

... does insisting one knows what is contained in an as-yet undisclosed report add to the discussion?

I've been here more than a decade longer than you - I think I know what DU is, and how it works. But thanks for pointing out the obvious nonetheless.

Response to NanceGreggs (Reply #38)

chillfactor

(7,580 posts)
33. what is with you tonight?
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:37 PM
Mar 2019

you have been mouthing off all evening.....you are fast becoming looking like a fool! Good grief......have respect for other's opinions!

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
51. No one is telling anyone how to react.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:42 AM
Mar 2019

But a lot of people are pointing out that reacting to non-facts as though they were facts is completely pointless.

 

Tipperary

(6,930 posts)
83. Take a deep breath dude. Go for a walk. Watch Netflix. Read a book.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 07:31 AM
Mar 2019

This is reminiscent of the panicky guy on David Letterman lol.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
31. I think "No further indictments" pretty much tells us something about the report.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:35 PM
Mar 2019

There’s still a chance there is some new revelation that makes GOPers condemn trump and call for his removal from office, but we likely already know or suspect the worst. Yet, GOPers don’t appear to care.

We need to turn our attention to beating GOPers in 2020, and let this go (even if hoping the report, or other actions, somehow bring trump down).

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
72. "This" should ... NOT ... be impeachment seeing he's on its face violating emoluments clauses as
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 05:58 AM
Mar 2019

... we type.

One of the reasons we have to "let this go" is we let little shit go and KGOP runs right over it. We get rid of the fairness doctrine and the KGOP gets its own TV network that keeps the presidents poll numbers floating 35 - 45 instead in the mid 20s like Nixon.

We "let this go" and we get screwed nearly every time

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
87. So alternative is to try Impeachment in House, hope that goes well, and watch it die in Senate.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 09:32 AM
Mar 2019

Democrats would look like losers to a lot of voters. If you don't have the votes and aren't likely to get them, why go for failure?

Beat the POS at the polls.

uponit7771

(90,348 posts)
97. No, impeachment in the house then that's it and "looking like losers" is what's going to happen any
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:43 AM
Mar 2019

...way seeing the KGOP has a mouth piece who aren't going to vote DNC in numbers.

"looking like losers" is a done deal when the guy who takes kids from parents seeking help is still floating in the 40's seeing they have a mouth piece which Nixon didn't have.

Do what's right and enforce the rule of law

Lock him up.

(6,939 posts)
112. Floating 35 - 45 means they should be losers.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 02:14 PM
Mar 2019

Their last two first-term wins where EC because millions of liberal voters don't or can't (or don't care to) vote.

GOTV and the orange mob boss who doesn't give a shit about laws and who think he is above it if he shot someone on 5th Avenue will not win 2020, but get thrown in jail for life.

Igel

(35,337 posts)
132. Once I cited a snippet of law to a paralegal.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 09:17 PM
Mar 2019

She laughed.

"The law doesn't mean what it says. It means what a judge says it says."

It removes the very idea of judicial interpretation into the specialist's camp, and treats all legal wording as jargon and cant. While I think that this is an insane way to run a country, nonetheless many lawyers delight in coming up with the most twisted, self-serving interpretation of language, using the most arcane methods, to win their cases. In fact, they delight in hard cases because they often make bad, albeit self-serving and distorted, case law. It means a regular, educated adult cannot hope to actually read the law and have any certainty as to what's legal or illegal.

No court has actually ruled on what "emoluments" in the emoluments clause means.

 

BlueFlorida

(1,532 posts)
41. I think some people were expecting
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:50 PM
Mar 2019

dozens of indictments on the day of the report and there were none.

So they felt let down.

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
43. Undoubtedly that's true.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 11:55 PM
Mar 2019

But by not recognizing the legal and political realities, they set themselves up for that ultimate disappointment. That's on them, not on Mueller.

 

lancelyons

(988 posts)
44. The fat man is warming up their voice. Give it a few days and you will be back here removing this th
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:13 AM
Mar 2019

The fat man is warming up their voice. Give it a few days and you will be back here removing this thRead.

You don’t need the actual report to see how trump and crew are interpreting this and believe me. They all have seen the core of the report. The Jeff sssions cabinet chair thing was a ploy

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
48. I've been posting on DU for over a decade.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:26 AM
Mar 2019

I have never gone back and deleted a thread after the fact. And I won't be deleting this one.

How Trump and crew "interpret" Mueller's report is of no consequence whatsoever.

They recently "interpreted" Manafort's judge as having declared there was no collusion between Trump and the Russians. Was that true? No. Was that what the judge actually said? No.

The RW spin has been in full force for two years - it didn't stop Mueller, it isn't stopping the SDNY, and it won't stop the Democratic-held House from pursuing further investigations.





ancianita

(36,130 posts)
49. Yeah, fuck all that. I'm happy. The next few months are just the beginning of the end.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:38 AM
Mar 2019

Tell 'em, Nance!

 

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)
50. When we've spent 2 years sharing Mueller memes equating him with God... Yeah it's disappointing.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:39 AM
Mar 2019

And I saw it coming.

I NEVER understood the sudden praise, worship and adoration for a lifelong Republican like people have done with Mueller the last 2 years. But we've been doing the same with McCain so actually I guess I'm not really surprised.

Azathoth

(4,611 posts)
57. This +1000
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 01:37 AM
Mar 2019

Fifteen years ago, most of DU was ready to send Mueller to the Hague for his (relatively minor) role in helping Dubya manufacture the Iraq War. Then, suddenly, the day Rosenstein appointed him, he became the noblest and most incorruptible Hand of Justice in history.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
52. nods "we are our own worst enemy"
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:43 AM
Mar 2019

Because we seem to enjoy doing the GOp's work for them. If it is a nothing burger, let the GOP spend effort to reduce it to that, which in the process means they will have to risk-making the mistakes that will very often turn out to be worse than what they were trying to cover up.

This is like the way many people thought Obama was going to shoot magic bullets instead of begin thehard work of making the GOP lose.

Azathoth

(4,611 posts)
60. It's pretty simple. Absent new indictments, the only thing left is political action by Congress
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 01:47 AM
Mar 2019

And absent incontrovertible proof from Mueller that Trump single-handedly butchered an entire school bus of children, there ain't going to be any binding action by Congress. Impeachment is off the table. Dem leadership has already made it as clear as they can that the strategy is to spend two years campaigning by bleeding Trump slow with Congressional investigations. Nadler and Schiff are going to spend the next two years posturing on TV as they fight endless tit-for-tat stonewalling from the White House. Meanwhile, Trump will do as he pleases and sit in the Oval Office until January 2021 at the earliest.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
64. The Mueller investigation is only going after ''Russian collusion'' if I'm not wrong.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 02:29 AM
Mar 2019

There are more than a dozen other misdeeds that could be deemed as impeachable offenses. However, I'm hearing a reluctants from our leaders of both houses to go down that road. This is most disturbing.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
101. It's tough to argue he was only going after Russian collusion when
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:58 AM
Mar 2019

He charged a bunch of people with things unrelated to the Trump campaign colluding with Russia.

Sunsky

(1,737 posts)
65. Exactly
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 02:35 AM
Mar 2019

and thank you. Nance, you're always the voice of reason. It was disappointing to see seasoned posters reacting like chicken little yesterday. These posters acted as if they received a personal copy of the Mueller report and Trump was completely exonerated. It became hard to tell the trolls from the regulars. I got tired of having to trash posts and ignore posters, that I just came off DU.

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
80. The power of DU is that it is a place where those, myself included, who have anxiety about the
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:39 AM
Mar 2019

Mueller report feel hopeless and anxiety takes hold, can come to this site for solace. Don't berate, but embrace as so many posters have who have reassured us that all is not loss. Their loyalty to our party is not wavering and you cannot blame them when it seems their hopes to remove a monster from the White House are fading. Thank you again DU members who understand our angst and are willing to help us come down from the edge. Kudos to all those who in their strength are not fazed, but please do not belittle others.

Ninga

(8,276 posts)
86. Thank you. For those not want to panic to extend a bit of understanding to those of us who
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 08:55 AM
Mar 2019

are frought with worry, is just plain kind.

Not everyone is wired the same way.

 

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)
89. I think the OP is trying to speak on behalf of 252,000 other registered users.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:21 AM
Mar 2019

Not sure she understands that's not how this site works.

NanceGreggs

(27,817 posts)
128. I am only speaking on behalf of myself ...
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 08:26 PM
Mar 2019

... I asked that those who were posting as though they know what is in the Mueller report were getting their information. Asking a question does not constitute speaking on behalf of others.

(BTW, that 252,000 number includes every person who ever signed-up on DU, and is a far cry from the number of people currently participating. Sadly, the number of people posting here has been in a steep decline for years.)

Enoki33

(1,587 posts)
98. Whatever is in the report, and none of us here yet know, it will of
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:44 AM
Mar 2019

necessity be redacted to protect the CI sources, and will represent an intermission as some experts have expressed. The real vulnerability of tRump is in following the money. That is being done by the ongoing House investigations, by SDNY and by NY state. Sure we all know that in all likelihood tRump is guilty of impeachable crimes, but because of the current makeup of the Senate they unfortunately have become part of the political theatre. The fight over thr Mueller report will continue, but it’s the public exposure of his crimes by the ongoing investigations that will humiliate and bring him to his just rewards. For surviving that process patience is the required ingredient. Just one layperson’s opinion.

Lock him up.

(6,939 posts)
113. Exactly. And go out register new young voters.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 02:20 PM
Mar 2019

The orange mob boss who thinks he's above the law if he shot someone on 5th Avenue will lose in November 2020 and get what he deserves. Prison for the rest of his pathetic life.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
99. No one here knows whats in it
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:49 AM
Mar 2019

But they do see how the people who DO know whats in it are reacting.


We'll know -why- they are reacting the way they do soon enough.

But for right now all we see are the Republicans relaxing.

No the fat lady isn't singing. She soaking in the hot tub relaxing with Republicans in Florida.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
106. Savior syndrome. Some are looking for a hero to save them.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:50 PM
Mar 2019

Be it the next president or a prosecutor. I hope the goods are in the report but I'd rather read it first before I set my hair on fire.

Nitram

(22,845 posts)
107. Anybody who claims know anything in the report before it has been publicly released is talking out
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:59 PM
Mar 2019

their poop chute. Anybody who calls the report a "bust" is clearly spreading disinformation to cast doubt on the report. Anybody who claims the report has exonerated anyone is spreading propaganda for the Trump administration.

Ford_Prefect

(7,917 posts)
114. It seems that no-one has read Seth Abramson's lengthy series of tweets:
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 03:20 PM
Mar 2019

In 54 well-observed remarks, he dismantles the mythology and media hype being spun around the so-called end of Mueller's investigation.

[link:


|

Seth Abramson
?
Verified account

@SethAbramson
Follow Follow @SethAbramson
More
(THREAD) BREAKING NEWS: Mueller has sent a report to DOJ that DOJ is representing is "comprehensive" and will shortly be publicly summarized. A lot of the reporting surrounding this major event is *wrong*—so I'll try to report things accurately. I hope you'll read on and retweet.

2:22 PM - 22 Mar 2019
14,269 Retweets 19,882 Likes coffee lover🌊☕️🇺🇸 🎓🌎♻️❄️Mouse HoustonJenny LucaIngrid HarrisVictoria GonzalezJrsHil.i.am🇨🇦 CANADA HATES TЯ☭MP 🇨🇦Einav Yifrach
1,626 replies 14,269 retweets 19,882 likes
Reply 1.6K Retweet 14K Like 20K
New conversation

Seth Abramson
?
Verified account

@SethAbramson
22h22 hours ago
More
1/ At the risk of sounding like Mike Myers' famous SNL talk-show host Linda Richman, "Mueller's final Trump-Russia report" is neither "Mueller's," final, about "Trump-Russia" or a "report." So all the breathless "reporting" today suggesting otherwise is inaccurate and misleading.

220 replies 2,331 retweets 6,932 likes
Reply 220 Retweet 2.3K Like 6.9K

Seth Abramson
?
Verified account

@SethAbramson
22h22 hours ago
More
2/ What we call the "Trump-Russia" investigation is a web of criminal, counterintelligence, and Congressional investigations that intersect with the work of the Special Counsel's Office. So there are three key "c"-words here—"criminal," "counterintelligence," and "Congressional."

68 replies 1,846 retweets 6,057 likes
Reply 68 Retweet 1.8K Like 6.1K

Seth Abramson
?
Verified account

@SethAbramson
22h22 hours ago
More
3/ Special Counsel Mueller is part of the "criminal" investigation; Mueller's work *intersects* with the "counterintelligence" investigation; and his work feeds into and draws from the Congressional investigation. And here's the key: all three of these investigations are ongoing.

59 replies 1,993 retweets 6,345 likes
Reply 59 Retweet 2.0K Like 6.3K

Seth Abramson
?
Verified account

@SethAbramson
22h22 hours ago
More
4/ As part of the "criminal" investigation, Mueller investigated some things his office then prosecuted; he investigated some things his office handed off to others; he investigated some things he chose not to prosecute; he investigated some things he is letting Congress handle.

36 replies 1,551 retweets 5,526 likes
Reply 36 Retweet 1.6K Like 5.5K

Seth Abramson
?
Verified account

@SethAbramson
22h22 hours ago
More
5/ Mueller's "criminal" investigations—that is, the information he derived during his nearly 24 months of *criminal investigative work*—then fed directly into multiple "counterintelligence" investigations and will undoubtedly feed into many ongoing "Congressional" investigations.

26 replies 1,338 retweets 5,049 likes
Reply 26 Retweet 1.3K Like 5.0K

Seth Abramson
?
Verified account

@SethAbramson
22h22 hours ago
More
6/ The news we got today is that Mueller will not *himself* be bringing any more indictments. That's it. That's *all* that has just happened. Any reporting that says the "Russia probe is done" is false. Any reporting that "Mueller's work is done" is false. It is only what I said.

184 replies 3,510 retweets 8,752 likes
Reply 184 Retweet 3.5K Like 8.8K


Azathoth

(4,611 posts)
116. Seth Abramson is attempting damage control on an issue he's invested in
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 03:52 PM
Mar 2019

He's elaborately dancing around the simple truth that the criminal side of the Russia investigation is over. Done. Finished. Not a single administration official will be charged. Fin.

Yes, there are counterintelligence investigations ongoing. Those aren't criminal investigations, they are all classified, and the results will eventually get dropped into our vast intelligence stockpile. They won't lead to indictments of Trump or his administration.

Yes, there are other investigations at SDNY and elsewhere. We have no idea what results they will produce, but we DO know they won't produce any indictments over Russia or obstruction of the Russia investigation.

Yes, there are Congressional investigations ongoing. There are ALWAYS congressional investigations ongoing. The results will be politically relevant, and that's all.

At the end of the day, not a single American will be charged on the core issues of conspiracy with Russia and obstruction. That kind of takes the air out of th cottage industry Abramson has been building for himself for the last two years.

Ford_Prefect

(7,917 posts)
118. You appear to know the hearts of the DOJ, the FBI, The SDNY Prosecutor, the NY AG and Congress.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 05:13 PM
Mar 2019

If I took your view I wouldn't need to vote, since the outcome appears to be pre-ordained by forces we cannot influence...And I thought we were a fact based community at DU forum.

I recall that it took over 2 years to investigate and prosecute the events and people involved in Watergate. That is after Nixon's resignation and pardon led to a reduced investigative focus and the essential whitewash of the GOP funding and dirty tricks apparatus.

Far more has been made public than during Watergate. There is a much more widespread range of investigation results yet to be prosecuted in SDNY and by the NY AG. Trump may well set a personal record for the number of times his name appears on felony warrants, time required to prosecute all charges, on the range of warrant subjects and jurisdictions. This is to say nothing of what the members of his family appear to headed for.

There is no simple truth except that Trump is at the heart of an enormous and international criminal enterprise. The Fraud charges against the Trump organization in NY are criminal and felonious. That investigation alone will get him and his time at Sing Sing or another equally commodious state institution.

Initech

(100,097 posts)
117. This battle is over. The war is long from over.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 04:05 PM
Mar 2019

We have many more battles to fight before we can declare victory.

garybeck

(9,942 posts)
121. Excuse me but
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 06:51 PM
Mar 2019

While we don't know the contents of the report, from what I've read, it is confirmed the are no more indictments coming from Mueller. That is extremely disappointing. That means no one is getting indicted for lying about the Trump tower meeting. That means assange isn't getting indicted. It means that while manafort admitted to giving polling data to kilimnik and lying about it, none of the charges are related to collusion. This is disappointing and people have a right to feel that way.

wiley

(2,921 posts)
126. James Carville Syndrome?
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 07:38 PM
Mar 2019

Still, Carville is younger than Bernie who only seems to know the best people of late like David Sirota. Was superficial thinking somehow bred into the American population?

EleanorR

(2,393 posts)
127. We know trump is filthy the way we knew Gotti was filthy
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 07:50 PM
Mar 2019

And even if the report doesn't come up with a contract between trump and putin signed in blood, that doesn't exonerate him. A mob boss should not be POTUS.

Response to NanceGreggs (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could the DU posters who ...