Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,576 posts)
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 02:25 PM Mar 2019

March 24 1989--Exxon Valdez oil spill

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill







The Exxon Valdez oil spill was a manmade disaster that occurred when Exxon Valdez, an oil tanker owned by the Exxon Shipping Company, spilled 11 million gallons of crude oil into Alaska’s Prince William Sound on March 24, 1989. It was the worst oil spill in U.S. history until the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010. The Exxon Valdez oil slick covered 1,300 miles of coastline and killed hundreds of thousands of seabirds, otters, seals and whales. Nearly 30 years later, pockets of crude oil remain in some locations. After the spill, Exxon Valdez returned to service under a different name, operating for more than two decades as an oil tanker and ore carrier.

On the evening of March 23, 1989, Exxon Valdez left the port of Valdez, Alaska, bound for Long Beach, California, with 53 million gallons of Prudhoe Bay crude oil onboard. At four minutes after midnight on March 24, the ship struck Bligh Reef, a well-known navigation hazard in Alaska’s Prince William Sound. The impact of the collision tore open the ship’s hull, causing some 11 million gallons of crude oil to spill into the water.

At the time, it was the largest single oil spill in U.S. waters. Initial attempts to contain the oil failed, and in the months that followed, the oil slick spread, eventually covering about 1,300 miles of coastline.Investigators later learned that Joseph Hazelwood, the captain of Exxon Valdez, had been drinking at the time and had allowed an unlicensed third mate to steer the massive ship. In March 1990, Hazelwood was acquitted of felony charges. He was convicted of a single charge of misdemeanor negligence, fined $50,000, and ordered to perform 1,000 hours of community service.


Oil Spill Cleanup

In the months after the Exxon Valdez oil spill, Exxon employees, federal responders and more than 11,000 Alaska residents worked to clean up the oil spill. Exxon payed (sic) about $2 billion in cleanup costs and $1.8 billion for habitat restoration and personal damages related to the spill.
Cleanup workers skimmed oil from the water’s surface, sprayed oil dispersant chemicals in the water and on shore, washed oiled beaches with hot water and rescued and cleaned animals trapped in oil. Environmental officials purposefully left some areas of shoreline untreated so they could study the effect of cleanup measures, some of which were unproven at the time. They later found that aggressive washing with high-pressure, hot water hoses was effective in removing oil, but did even more ecological damage by killing the remaining plants and animals in the process.

. . . .

https://www.history.com/topics/1980s/exxon-valdez-oil-spill
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
March 24 1989--Exxon Valdez oil spill (Original Post) niyad Mar 2019 OP
I remember it all too well. The first stunning devastation of our oceans... JudyM Mar 2019 #1
and there are probably workers KT2000 Mar 2019 #2
those who have not died, yet. niyad Mar 2019 #3

JudyM

(29,279 posts)
1. I remember it all too well. The first stunning devastation of our oceans...
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 03:52 PM
Mar 2019

The marine life and birds soaked in oil, the drunk captain who got a slap on the wrist, the horror of seeing some of the worst depraved capitalistic opportunism that continued through and beyond the Deepwater Horizon, etc... due to big $ lobbying for regulatory laxity.

Companies whose activities pose the risk of massive environmental damage should be internalizing the costs of prevention and research into continuously advancing cutting edge abatement. Especially now with clean energy’s increasing affordability, the burden should be much higher on complete cleanup as well, and if they can’t technologically manage that, they shouldn’t be operating in our waters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»March 24 1989--Exxon Vald...