Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 07:36 AM Mar 2019

It took 2 days to release the Starr Report that took 4 years to gather.

Mueller's investigation isn't even 2 years old ... and for some reason it's been over 5 days and nothing from the KGOP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starr_Report

After the four year investigation of Clinton, the Office of the Independent Counsel delivered its 445-page report to Congress on September 9, 1998. For two days, the report sat unread in the Ford House Office Building as Democrats and Republicans in the House of Representatives debated what to do with it. On September 11, the House voted 363–63 to release the report to the public.[5] When the report was uploaded to the internet, it became a sensation, with twelve percent of adult Americans — 20 million people


and now this

McConnell blocks resolution calling for Mueller report to be released publicly


https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...ion-calling-for-mueller-report-to-be-released

"Bob Barr Lied To America" ... is starting to look more conceivable the longer the KGOP sits on the report.

Your take?

tia
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It took 2 days to release the Starr Report that took 4 years to gather. (Original Post) uponit7771 Mar 2019 OP
Thank you for amplying this, uponit UpInArms Mar 2019 #1
+1, someone on MJ just mentioned the Trump admin is trying to blunt the effect of bad things uponit7771 Mar 2019 #2
I am sick to death of Republicans getting a free pass UpInArms Mar 2019 #4
. uponit7771 Mar 2019 #3
The law was different then... and the change was intentional FBaggins Mar 2019 #5
True, but that doesn't mean we don't thump a drum about the difference JHB Mar 2019 #7
Thump the drum, sure... FBaggins Mar 2019 #9
Kicking, because this needs to become a talking point. JHB Mar 2019 #6
release the report or bars for Barr! Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2019 #8
Republicans specialize in cover-ups, they are like the mob. Have been since the 50's. Mr. Sparkle Mar 2019 #10
+1 uponit7771 Mar 2019 #11

UpInArms

(51,285 posts)
1. Thank you for amplying this, uponit
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 07:56 AM
Mar 2019

I am entirely annoyed by the lack of transparency and the double standards

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)
2. +1, someone on MJ just mentioned the Trump admin is trying to blunt the effect of bad things
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 08:04 AM
Mar 2019

... coming out in the report by delaying them as much as possible so that a narrative is already set.

I'm thinking liken the report to Nixon Tapes 2.0 or something and make the release of it a big deal so when the report is released people will be paying attention to it.

Still wont get Red Don impeached (we now elect kings) but will make it harder for him to be re-elected.

FBaggins

(26,775 posts)
5. The law was different then... and the change was intentional
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:34 AM
Mar 2019

Starr operated under the 1978 Ethics in Government Act. He was actually required to produce a report for Congress... so of course, it was already written with that audience and public consumption in mind. There wasn't anything to edit. The two days had nothing to do with how long it took to fix the document for release.

The regulations that Mueller operates under were created by Janet Reno specifically in response to concerns with the old regulation. The current scheme contemplated only a confidential report to the AG and a summary from the AG to Congress outlining two specific topics.

JHB

(37,163 posts)
7. True, but that doesn't mean we don't thump a drum about the difference
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 10:29 AM
Mar 2019

The report on the longer investigation became public almost immediately. They could do it for this one too, and would if it really did exonerate Trump.

But it doesn't, and if we don't thump a drum about that the lazy media narrative will get stuck on "Trump was cleared".

FBaggins

(26,775 posts)
9. Thump the drum, sure...
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 10:39 AM
Mar 2019

The problem is that that's apples and oranges. It doesn't matter that it was a longer investigation because that report was delivered already ready to be released. It could have been released immediately because there was nothing classified (etc.) in it to begin with. (IIRC, there was a little GJ testimony, but that was actually the subject of the investigation)

Without knowing what Mueller included in the report, we don't have a clue how long it should take to prepare for release (even assuming good intentions on Barr's part... which I don't).

So we can't use the Starr report as a measuring stick for how long it should take... we just need to keep pressuring them to release it ASAP.

My opinion is that Congress should allow him to redact whatever he wants for now. There's no way that they could include Mueller's actually findings in that redaction. So if Barr's summary is wildly disconnected from reality... THEN we have new evidence of obstruction and "Barr Lied!!" becomes the new headline. Convincing a court to force a fuller release at that point would be easy.

Mr. Sparkle

(2,950 posts)
10. Republicans specialize in cover-ups, they are like the mob. Have been since the 50's.
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 10:43 AM
Mar 2019

While Democrats believe in transparency, even to our own detriment. I have a feeling, they are going to do their upmost to hide the juicy bits in the report.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It took 2 days to release...