Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:01 AM Mar 2019

Yes or No, Do you still believe that Trump conspired with Russia?

Regardless of what the Barr Report says?

I do.

I think they are conspiring with Russia, as we speak.

He attempted to end the sanctions for Russia. What was he going to get in return?

He attempted to break up the NATO Union, much to the delight of Putin. His overtures to North Korea were blessed by Putin and Russia.

Never did he have one unkind word for the Russian dictator. In fact, he took Putin's side over our own Intelligence.

He schemed to meet with Putin in secret, like in Helsinki.

There was so much collusion that was done in broad daylight, I am not ready to accept that there was no collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

I can understand why they would like the American people to believe that. If indeed there was collusion, it would be like a Russian coup. They would have control of our government.

As for conspiring at this moment, in my opinion, they are attempting to use Russian money to build the nuclear power plants in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East, unknown to most of our Legislature.

233 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes or No, Do you still believe that Trump conspired with Russia? (Original Post) kentuck Mar 2019 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author pnwest Mar 2019 #1
Hell yes Roland99 Mar 2019 #2
me too. n/t MBS Mar 2019 #117
Yes, Trump is a traitor. trueblue2007 Mar 2019 #134
There is a non zero chance he was a useful idiot. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2019 #3
and if he was, he is unfit. mopinko Mar 2019 #48
you are only 1/2 right Perseus Mar 2019 #70
He has plenty of help Scarsdale Mar 2019 #72
Trump is definitely not smart enough to conspire. A useful idiot who looked the other way as our Pepsidog Mar 2019 #83
What? You don't do polls? Oh, and Hell yes he did...nt Wounded Bear Mar 2019 #4
Absolutely YES Pachamama Mar 2019 #5
Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2019 #6
A poll that isn't. My poor fingers. Yes. Abso effing lutely. n/t rzemanfl Mar 2019 #7
drumpf illegally conspired with Russia to steal the election. lark Mar 2019 #8
There was no signed agreement between Trump and the Russian Government! Beausoleil Mar 2019 #9
Exactly! justie18 Mar 2019 #38
Yeah, I didn't know a conspiracy had to be fully documented, Beausoleil Mar 2019 #55
Yes Bettie Mar 2019 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author sop Mar 2019 #82
Yep. MelissaB Mar 2019 #11
Do I believe there were weekly meetings and organized conspiracy? Never did. PeeJ52 Mar 2019 #12
YES YES YES YES and bluestarone Mar 2019 #13
Of course. Bonx Mar 2019 #14
people have been convicted on far less. unblock Mar 2019 #15
Yes. Without a doubt. GoCubsGo Mar 2019 #16
110% yes... myohmy2 Mar 2019 #17
With the russian government? No. leftynyc Mar 2019 #18
William Barr's summary said the Russian government YessirAtsaFact Mar 2019 #35
Good point leftynyc Mar 2019 #45
Both the FSB & the GRU are part of the Russian Government and they worked to rig the election ... Botany Mar 2019 #63
Yep. triron Mar 2019 #202
this shanny Mar 2019 #109
YES ! dweller Mar 2019 #19
Yes. MaryMagdaline Mar 2019 #20
Did he directly do it to undermine the integrity of the election? Freethinker65 Mar 2019 #21
You hit the nail right on the head, FT65. KY_EnviroGuy Mar 2019 #215
Yes he did. lpbk2713 Mar 2019 #22
He willingly accepted their offer. Polly Hennessey Mar 2019 #23
With all that was happening then, yes rockfordfile Mar 2019 #24
Hell yes. Nt Demsrule86 Mar 2019 #25
YES !!! and Barr report only talked about Russian Government uponit7771 Mar 2019 #26
Bingo louis c Mar 2019 #74
No doubt about it. Butterflylady Mar 2019 #27
Absolutely. But, is there a transcript, tape, email, text that has him saying "Russia, help me win" Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2019 #28
Yes there is a video: "Russia if you are listening..." Doodley Mar 2019 #42
True dat. Yet people already know about that - and they don't give a shit. Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2019 #52
Exactly. Turin_C3PO Mar 2019 #208
+1 ck4829 Mar 2019 #224
trump is putin's puppet Gothmog Mar 2019 #29
Of course he did Leith Mar 2019 #30
Perhaps he was too dumb to conspire and Russia too smart to conspire with him. Sneederbunk Mar 2019 #31
Yes. Delphinus Mar 2019 #32
Does this feel like a coup? Hell yeah! democratisphere Mar 2019 #33
Absofuckinglutely Celerity Mar 2019 #34
Wow! I had not seen that one. Yikes! FailureToCommunicate Mar 2019 #220
I think there is plenty of evidence Trump conspired with Russia Jarqui Mar 2019 #36
Yes, I do. PatrickforO Mar 2019 #37
100% Hell Yes! djacq Mar 2019 #39
yes nt yaesu Mar 2019 #40
Yes,yes,a thousand times yes. old guy Mar 2019 #41
Absolutely. That being said I think Bannon, Stone, Manafort are too savvy to outright break the law mr_lebowski Mar 2019 #43
He directly asked Russia to release Hillary Clinton's emails. It was collusion, out in the open. Doodley Mar 2019 #44
We need someone to leak the full Mueller report NOW. Lonestarblue Mar 2019 #46
Yes. He may have agreed personally well before he announced Hortensis Mar 2019 #47
Yes Takket Mar 2019 #49
Yes Mickju Mar 2019 #50
I have no reason not to believe it. Too much care has been taken to cover it up. ooky Mar 2019 #51
No doubt redstateblues Mar 2019 #53
Yes...but it's a difficult thing to prove... ewagner Mar 2019 #54
especially if he (Mueller) was limited to collusion DURING the election Locrian Mar 2019 #58
Yup... B Stieg Mar 2019 #56
Mueller the traitor? Vdizzle Mar 2019 #200
Why not? B Stieg Mar 2019 #214
no, because i never did. as in being able to prove trump directly Kurt V. Mar 2019 #57
Helsinki yes he conspired with Russia. IMHO IADEMO2004 Mar 2019 #59
Yep ck4829 Mar 2019 #225
Yes! Sunsky Mar 2019 #60
Yes! 100% certain. Greybnk48 Mar 2019 #61
Yes, certainly Glorfindel Mar 2019 #62
You know it. Anyone who can actually think for themselves knows it. KPN Mar 2019 #64
Totally and unequivocally. Trump aided and abetted a hostile foreign power that would help him win ancianita Mar 2019 #65
He's been doing it on TV since 2016. dchill Mar 2019 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author brandnewday2009 Mar 2019 #67
yep. triron Mar 2019 #68
Yes Generic Other Mar 2019 #69
YES!!👏 wendyb Mar 2019 #71
Sorta zipplewrath Mar 2019 #73
That's kind of where I am Puzzledtraveller Mar 2019 #196
I absolutely believe he colluded with Russia. Texin Mar 2019 #75
BIG.FUCKING.TIME. 50 Shades Of Blue Mar 2019 #76
There is no doubt in my mind The Liberal Lion Mar 2019 #77
I believe he is a pawn of the Russians...Putin's puppet or pawn. nt allgood33 Mar 2019 #78
Yes. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #79
Of course. NRaleighLiberal Mar 2019 #80
What happened and what you can prove are not always the same. Joe941 Mar 2019 #81
Without doubt, hell yes! nightwing1240 Mar 2019 #84
Yes. dmr Mar 2019 #85
YES!!!!!! gopiscrap Mar 2019 #86
I think he's still conspiring and not just with Russia. Follow the money to Trump projects. Vinca Mar 2019 #87
45 is a lying, traitorous, sack of $hit. mnhtnbb Mar 2019 #88
Need the Evidence that is in the Mueller Report McKim Mar 2019 #89
Yes Timmygoat Mar 2019 #92
Do bears poop in the woods? Totally Tunsie Mar 2019 #90
You better believe it! il_lilac Mar 2019 #91
yes. barbtries Mar 2019 #93
thank you for calling it the barr report. we do not know what is in the Mueller report, niyad Mar 2019 #94
He's either a Russian asset or a Russian agent...a distinction w/o a difference IMO. rainin Mar 2019 #95
Well, lillypaddle Mar 2019 #96
Yes, the few "official" contacts confirmed mutual agreement bigbrother05 Mar 2019 #97
yes k & r n/t prairierose Mar 2019 #98
Yes. Trump was and continues to be a Russian asset. nt SunSeeker Mar 2019 #99
Absolutely Niagara Mar 2019 #100
He certainly did Pepsidog Mar 2019 #101
Indubitably geardaddy Mar 2019 #102
It was Trump/Putin in 2016 at140 Mar 2019 #103
He absolutely did jmowreader Mar 2019 #104
Yes. What you said mtngirl47 Mar 2019 #105
Yes, all evidence points to conspiracy. CharleyDog Mar 2019 #106
Even if all the evidence is circumstantial, it is very strong... kentuck Mar 2019 #111
What you said FakeNoose Mar 2019 #175
Of Course! DarthDem Mar 2019 #107
Absolutely. Different Drummer Mar 2019 #108
YES, ABSOLUTELY!!! pazzyanne Mar 2019 #110
Absolutely, I would bet my life on it. smirkymonkey Mar 2019 #112
Yes and yes again WestCoastDem42 Mar 2019 #113
Yes, it's beyond obvious Blue_Tires Mar 2019 #114
Define "conspired" residentcynic Mar 2019 #115
I think it's a given that Trump & family knew Russia was working on winning the election for him. Honeycombe8 Mar 2019 #122
No argument from me residentcynic Mar 2019 #123
personally, I don't know... yuiyoshida Mar 2019 #116
Yes, and I'm not moving on until I have answers Ponietz Mar 2019 #118
Yes X 1000 sellitman Mar 2019 #119
Yes. DinahMoeHum Mar 2019 #120
Yes! Emphatically yes! llmart Mar 2019 #121
I don't believe it, I KNOW it (just like I knew the Iraq WMD was a lie). I KNOW things. joanbarnes Mar 2019 #124
Yes, I believe he did lunamagica Mar 2019 #125
Trump himself? No. Someone(s) in his campaign, and possibly family? Yes. jpljr77 Mar 2019 #126
Of course he did. He's a criminal in every aspect of his life. onecaliberal Mar 2019 #127
Yes, pretty obvious to me. walkingman Mar 2019 #128
Yes ananda Mar 2019 #129
Yes bighart Mar 2019 #130
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ElementaryPenguin Mar 2019 #131
Does a Russian bear shit in the woods? n/t shanti Mar 2019 #132
Yes. Period. Full stop. MaeScott Mar 2019 #133
YES!!!! colsohlibgal Mar 2019 #135
Yes Runningdawg Mar 2019 #136
Yes. I have NO DOUBTS whatsoever. Silver Gaia Mar 2019 #137
yes proud patriot Mar 2019 #138
I have no fucking doubt that Pussy Grabber conspired with and got pissed on by russians. BigDemVoter Mar 2019 #139
Yes because... jimlup Mar 2019 #140
Abso effin' lutely! So does Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan. JAD Mar 2019 #141
Yes jeaps Mar 2019 #142
Yes Meowmee Mar 2019 #143
Yes, he cooperated. happy feet Mar 2019 #144
As I have always believed, Progressive Jones Mar 2019 #145
Yes. CaptainTruth Mar 2019 #146
Yes cp Mar 2019 #147
Does the Pope use the porcelain in the Vatican? marble falls Mar 2019 #148
I think he used "plausible deniability" like many in power do when something shady benefits him. ehrnst Mar 2019 #149
++++ sheshe2 Mar 2019 #157
I agree mcar Mar 2019 #164
That is exactly how the mafia operated BlueFlorida Mar 2019 #167
+1 nt brer cat Mar 2019 #197
He's a half-witting Russian asset. He believes what Vlad tells him. Hassler Mar 2019 #150
Yes. tosh Mar 2019 #151
The contention that Mueller could find no evidence Moral Compass Mar 2019 #152
No doubt sfwriter Mar 2019 #153
I never did. Puzzledtraveller Mar 2019 #154
Of course he did. wendyb-NC Mar 2019 #155
We will not be gaslighted by all that we read and saw these last several years. Efilroft Sul Mar 2019 #156
Yes, and likely followed the mafia model of hands off, with no electronic trail. He got all his OnDoutside Mar 2019 #158
YES ... definitely CatMor Mar 2019 #159
NO underpants Mar 2019 #160
Yes. underthematrix Mar 2019 #161
Is this a trick question? Ferrets are Cool Mar 2019 #162
Of course he did. BlueTsunami2018 Mar 2019 #163
Yes. sinkingfeeling Mar 2019 #165
Ab-so-lutey!!! samplegirl Mar 2019 #166
yes indeed dawn5651 Mar 2019 #168
Yes. highplainsdem Mar 2019 #169
No question about it - YES! n/t solara Mar 2019 #170
yep 0rganism Mar 2019 #171
Do Trump supporters shit in the woods? AdamGG Mar 2019 #172
Of course. paleotn Mar 2019 #173
I don't think, I know. Mr.Bill Mar 2019 #174
Yes Firestorm49 Mar 2019 #176
I think he conspired with Russians. shanny Mar 2019 #177
Yes leanforward Mar 2019 #178
Yes yes a thousand times yes! n/t coeur_de_lion Mar 2019 #179
Yes, yes,yes,yes! bitterross Mar 2019 #180
Yes. nt dflprincess Mar 2019 #181
Duh. Amaryllis Mar 2019 #182
There is no doubt in my mind, if he didn't why has so many people lied doc03 Mar 2019 #183
Yes. stillcool Mar 2019 #184
This is about as predictable as taking a poll of biologists as to whether evolution is true... regnaD kciN Mar 2019 #185
Yes. Mersky Mar 2019 #186
You have to ask? czarjak Mar 2019 #187
Yes Loryn Mar 2019 #188
It's right there in front of us WyLoochka Mar 2019 #189
Oh hell yes...nt N_E_1 for Tennis Mar 2019 #190
Yes. PinkTiger Mar 2019 #191
Definitely. broiles Mar 2019 #192
Yes, he has no choice. GeorgeGist Mar 2019 #193
Yes Luciferous Mar 2019 #194
Yup Blue Owl Mar 2019 #195
In plain sight. And still ongoing. n/t Mister Ed Mar 2019 #198
Da. tclambert Mar 2019 #199
Da. Leghorn21 Mar 2019 #201
F%CK YES! n/t Richard D Mar 2019 #203
of course TalenaGor Mar 2019 #204
Yes LW1977 Mar 2019 #205
Fucking-hell YES he conspired. The S.O.B. meet with Putin ALONE, behind closed doors. VOX Mar 2019 #206
He did it in full view of the public. No one gets a pass for "joking" here. NCLefty Mar 2019 #207
At the VERY LEAST with the oligarchy. Turin_C3PO Mar 2019 #209
F...in A diddly!!! Oldtimeralso Mar 2019 #210
Yes! "Russia, if you're listening..." How many times have we seen that??! Rhiannon12866 Mar 2019 #211
yes n/t bobGandolf Mar 2019 #212
I mean, is being a paid employee considered conspiring? quakerboy Mar 2019 #213
Any person who doesn't know Aussie105 Mar 2019 #216
He's a traitor. EndGOPPropaganda Mar 2019 #217
YES. BlueMTexpat Mar 2019 #218
No doubt in my mind, and Barr is a partisan liar. BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2019 #219
What do you think? nt Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2019 #221
Fuck yeah. argyl Mar 2019 #222
Yes ck4829 Mar 2019 #223
Obviously YES and rump's team made sure to leak everything out in drips so it would not be UniteFightBack Mar 2019 #226
Personally, I believe he did and he did through others and knew about it. Thomas Hurt Mar 2019 #227
I think he wanted to Kali Mar 2019 #228
Absolutely yes. nt tblue37 Mar 2019 #229
Yes. It's obvious from his public actions and utterances. northoftheborder Mar 2019 #230
And this is what's going on with global warming and Hillary on the other side... Terry_M Mar 2019 #231
yes Demovictory9 Mar 2019 #232
Of course. I knew something was wrong the night he won fescuerescue Apr 2019 #233

Response to kentuck (Original post)

mopinko

(70,268 posts)
48. and if he was, he is unfit.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:55 AM
Mar 2019

but i agree. he may have started out as a useful idiot (tho i doubt it) but you would have to work damn hard to stay that ignorant. esp after getting ic briefings.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
70. you are only 1/2 right
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:21 AM
Mar 2019

He conspired, but he is still a useful idiot...for now.

What people like him fail to understand is that his usefulness will eventually run out, and when it does, he will be terminated of his functions as a useful idiot, and that termination can come in any different ways that Putin will decide when the time comes.

Another thing he fails to understand is that most of the time useful idiots fall into a comfort zone where they start making mistakes against their masters (Chavez, Noriega, etc.) and that is when they are terminated from their functions as useful idiots.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
72. He has plenty of help
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:26 AM
Mar 2019

from the gop. No way could he do all this damage alone. There are other traitors in the government.

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
83. Trump is definitely not smart enough to conspire. A useful idiot who looked the other way as our
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:47 AM
Mar 2019

election was influenced by a hostile government is who he is and what he did.

lark

(23,166 posts)
8. drumpf illegally conspired with Russia to steal the election.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:06 AM
Mar 2019

Or else why did they lie so much and why did they have over 150 contacts with Russians during the election? There weren't 150 contacts with Teresa May or the Chancellor of Germany, there weren't 150 contacts with Sweden or Finland or Canada, why Russia? Why did FB retroactively pull hundreds of FB Russian pages intent on disrupting our county? Why did foreign spies comes up to us and tell us they overheard conspiracy in action? Nope, this is the imperial king & party asserting itself and sorry but if this stands we're totally fucked.

Beausoleil

(2,845 posts)
9. There was no signed agreement between Trump and the Russian Government!
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:07 AM
Mar 2019

So they could not have "colluded"! (Oligarchs don't count.)

justie18

(169 posts)
38. Exactly!
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:46 AM
Mar 2019

That is a footnote in Barr's summary letter - which no one in the media has chosen to discuss. Now the Washington Post and NYT are behaving as if the issue is over and done with - even though no one other than Barr and Rosenstein has yet to even read the Mueller report. The media has allowed Trump to win the PR battle. It is a sad and scary day for America.

Beausoleil

(2,845 posts)
55. Yeah, I didn't know a conspiracy had to be fully documented,
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:02 AM
Mar 2019

signed and notarized by the offending parties or it didn't happen.

So don't believe your lying eyes even though it happened right in front of us for the whole world to see!

Release the full report!

Response to Bettie (Reply #10)

 

PeeJ52

(1,588 posts)
12. Do I believe there were weekly meetings and organized conspiracy? Never did.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:11 AM
Mar 2019

Did I believe tRump was willing to accept any help and assist in any way they could, when they could with any answers or directions? Yes. Barr's report reads like he was looking for an LLC that conspired together daily with meetings and progress reports. I believe it was just as we saw on TV. Russia, if your listening...

unblock

(52,379 posts)
15. people have been convicted on far less.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:15 AM
Mar 2019

never mind that there's evidence that we don't know about, what we already know about is enough to convict.

we know he and people answering to him have had repeated contacts with russia, we know they've talked specifically about things that would benefit russia (sanctions, magnitsky act), we know they've supplied elections data, we know they asked for dirt on hillary both privately and publically, we know he's solicited crimes from russia (publically asking them to commit espionage on hillary's servers), and we know they've repeatedly lied about it. and of course, we also know he has some business interests in russia, and strongly suspect russia has some kind of kompromat on him, too.

we also know he's done many things to interfere with the investigations.


there's really no other explanation for the facts we already know about.

myohmy2

(3,182 posts)
17. 110% yes...
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:20 AM
Mar 2019

...too much circumstantial evidence...

...too much 'no collusion' and 'witch hunt'...

...too many nefarious characters surrounding the cheeto…

...MAGA Man's been crooked all of his life, why would he stop now?

...corruption has given him the Presidency...

...how could you not believe...

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
18. With the russian government? No.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:21 AM
Mar 2019

With the oligarchs - a resounding YES. I would also argue they're the exact same thing but the Mueller report specifically said the russian government so I'm making that distinction.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
45. Good point
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:52 AM
Mar 2019

I'm not sure if he was quoting the Mueller report at the time. I wont be satisfied until that report is public and until then every Dem should be shouting 'WHAT'S HE HIDING'?

Botany

(70,610 posts)
63. Both the FSB & the GRU are part of the Russian Government and they worked to rig the election ...
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:12 AM
Mar 2019

.... and the Trump campaign was well aware of the help that they asked for the help
that they got from Russia. The Trump campaign had a computer server that was contacted
to a bank in the Ukraine that was linked to Putin, Cambridge Analytica, Wikileaks, and
Russian intel and cyber warfare units.

" ...but the Mueller report specifically said ... " how do you know that? The Mueller report
has not been released.

Freethinker65

(10,068 posts)
21. Did he directly do it to undermine the integrity of the election?
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:31 AM
Mar 2019

Idk. He certainly encouraged help from outside the US.

However, he is also very easy to manipulate by flattery, so it is possible he was duped? Perhaps?

We are doing this because "you are the strongest best omnipotent person and only you can save the world" type talk from world governments that previously never would have given him the time of day or return a phone call from him, could get him to do practically anything for the possibility of being accepted in their league. Suddenly a publicity stunt to increase his brand image becomes a real possibility is his mind. Those around him like Bsnnon could have directed it and easily manipulated him. Hillary did call him a puppet which got him really upset.

The Hollywood and New York he as always wanted to be accepted by has always shunned and belittled him. You know his ego took a big hit when all A list performers turned down his request to perform st his inauguration. He skipped the media "roast" charity dinner because he cannot stand ridicule. His image and brand image are super important to him and he has no problems buying the appearance of friends and affection. Would he really care if he could be a secret puppet while using it to his advantage? In his world that is how things are done.

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,496 posts)
215. You hit the nail right on the head, FT65.
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 05:51 AM
Mar 2019

I'm thinking the core evil here is in his underlings that did anything possible to get the win - including collusion - and those guys know exactly how to use their narcissistic boss and father.

Republicans and Russian psychops are experts at manipulating emotions, brainwashing and tricking people into doing things they normally wouldn't do. Trump is their perfect puppet and he has the bully pulpit.

However, American Republicans have the flaw of not knowing when to stop or when they're going out of bounds. Their co-opting of our churches, never-ending attacks on Hillary and staying in bed with the NRA are good examples.

lpbk2713

(42,769 posts)
22. Yes he did.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:34 AM
Mar 2019


Trump is a weasel by nature and he surely would have sought out
and accepted any help in winning his election to the presidency.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
28. Absolutely. But, is there a transcript, tape, email, text that has him saying "Russia, help me win"
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:38 AM
Mar 2019

NO, he and Russia too devious and Mafioso-like to leave a trail.

Wish someone could have tapped his cell phone. He stays up late and yaks with his confidantes. Guess we can always hope one day, one of them turns.

BTW, whatever happened to us getting the translator at the Russian meeting to turn over transcripts?

Leith

(7,813 posts)
30. Of course he did
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:40 AM
Mar 2019

Beyond the numerous crimes he committed before our eyes, he and his minions did a lot more behind the scenes. The US is ruled by an international mob.

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
36. I think there is plenty of evidence Trump conspired with Russia
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:45 AM
Mar 2019

There was certainly enough in the media for Trump to fire Comey and have Mueller appointed to look into it. You do not do that if no evidence is there.

It is a hard thing to prove beyond unreasonable doubt. In part because, at least half the perpetrators are beyond the reach of US justice - in other countries. In part because there was a concerted effort to cover it up with all the lying, etc. Even without those, it is not an easy thing to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a president was guilty - because of the reluctance of DOJ to indict and because of his ability to pardon those close to him.

If the question was a civil one - based on the preponderance of the evidence, it's a slam dunk. There's plenty of evidence of a conspiracy.

As for control of Trump, I think Putin already controls him - just like someone is controlling Lindsey Graham.

djacq

(1,634 posts)
39. 100% Hell Yes!
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:46 AM
Mar 2019

After Barr did a shameful display of grovelling when Trump signed his first veto, he is not to be trusted.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
43. Absolutely. That being said I think Bannon, Stone, Manafort are too savvy to outright break the law
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:51 AM
Mar 2019

And the laws just aren't very strict about something like this.

There were enough degrees of separation (like Stone not actually working for Trump in any formal way), the docs being stolen by an outfit (Guccifer) that purported to/appeared to be an independent actor, and then using Wikileaks (rather than ever taking physical possession of stolen goods) to distribute the stolen info ... who have a long history of doing exactly that.

And there's absolutely ZERO question that he'd lied to the public every time he claimed to not know who the hacker(s) were. His campaign admitted in their letter to the Networks yesterday that they were approached by multiple Russian actors trying to get them to 'collude', so there's zero chance he didn't damn well know it wasn't some 400-lb dude in a basement in Jersey ...

Lonestarblue

(10,106 posts)
46. We need someone to leak the full Mueller report NOW.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:53 AM
Mar 2019

Before Trump and his cabal completely run away with the narrative of his perfect innocence and victim of a malicious witch hunt.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
47. Yes. He may have agreed personally well before he announced
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:53 AM
Mar 2019

for president and staffed up.

Agreed to cooperate under duress after being compromised is another possibility, but if so I think we can reasonably assume he's long preferred to think of himself as partnering with his buddy Putin.

Either way, or any other way, with or without legally conspiring with Putin, Trump has been betraying America to the benefit of Russia and other hostile nations since well before he actually took office. There's no doubt about that.

ewagner

(18,964 posts)
54. Yes...but it's a difficult thing to prove...
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:59 AM
Mar 2019

Russia hacked the DNC emails...Mueller established that...

WIKILEAKS distributed and timed the release of those but there is no clear link between how WIKI received the emails from the Russians.

Remember this...the Barr memo says that the ...Special Counsel found no evidence that the Trump Campaign colluded or cooperated directly or indirectly with nobody in the government of Russia...

In the Stone trial..Mueller's folks will prove that Stone coordinated the release of emails with WIKI...not the Russian Government...

There is an indictment against WIKI that will never be acted upon until we get Assange back into U.S. Terrritory...only then will we get to the link between Russian Government and WIKI and then to Stone and then directly to Trump.

Locrian

(4,522 posts)
58. especially if he (Mueller) was limited to collusion DURING the election
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:06 AM
Mar 2019

Did he launder money for the Russians before the election? Absolutely.
Did he meet in secret after the election? Treat Putin as his master? Absolutely.

Did Russia try to influence the election? Yes. With trump's brilliant (!) help - not so easy to prove.

Problem is Mueller was limited in scope. Did he trigger other investigations.... we'll have to wait and see.

B Stieg

(2,410 posts)
56. Yup...
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:02 AM
Mar 2019

But with traitors like Mueller and Barr in the mix, there's precious little hope the truth will ever be exposed.
These are not good days in America...

Greybnk48

(10,177 posts)
61. Yes! 100% certain.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:10 AM
Mar 2019

There is a mountain of evidence that supports that conclusion. We're being gaslighted.

Glorfindel

(9,739 posts)
62. Yes, certainly
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:11 AM
Mar 2019

Everyone involved in the Mueller investigation and the Barr report is a rePuke and therefore a liar.
I honestly never expected anything BUT a whitewash. It's what rePukes do.

ancianita

(36,156 posts)
65. Totally and unequivocally. Trump aided and abetted a hostile foreign power that would help him win
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:15 AM
Mar 2019

the national election against the voting majority of US citizens.

Response to kentuck (Original post)

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
73. Sorta
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:26 AM
Mar 2019

There is evidence his campaign conspired with them by supplying voter data.
There is evidence the campaign attempted to conspire with them.
There is evidence the campaign coordinated with them through Wiki-leaks.

I've said for some time that there was a real chance that the Russians realized Trump himself was too stupid to actually involve him in their activities.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
196. That's kind of where I am
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:29 PM
Mar 2019

did the campaign benefit from their influence? No doubt, did the Democrat suffer from the interference, yes, did Trump have to know anything about it to be a useful buffoon? No, he was ripe for the exploiting, but the downside is that what happened is exactly what I expected meaning, it was easy to find Russian interference, but the bar for conspiring, is so much higher.

Texin

(2,599 posts)
75. I absolutely believe he colluded with Russia.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:35 AM
Mar 2019

He's been playing footsie with various Russians since the late '80s in order to gain a foothold in Moscow for a vanity-branded hotel there. The one thing I know for sure is this: Putin wanted those Obama-imposed sanctions against the Russians who hacked the U.S. election process and hacked into the Democratic National computer servers lifted. Putin's useful servant got those sanctions to go away. The simple truth of the matter is that tRump and virtually all rethugs aspire to the kind of wealth and impunity that the oligarchs have in Russia (and members of corrupt royals like the Sauds). They'll do anything to get it - and indeed, they have done and will continue to do it until every natural resource is stripped, the coffers bled dry and the planet is left a desolate, worthless heap, and uninhabitable. The only mystery to me is where they think they'll find to escape in the aftermath.

dmr

(28,349 posts)
85. Yes.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:51 AM
Mar 2019

No doubt in my mind. You named some very strong instances.

For me, it began with the change in the GOP platform just prior to the RNC Convention. No one admitted doing it, but everyone denied having a hand in changing it. This solidified to me why Trump had very friendly views of both Russia and Putin.

Then foreign agent, Manafort arrived out of thin air, who then "chose" Pence as a possible VP. Pence's political career was in the trash heap trying to get reelected in Indiana. Remember Manafort faked plane trouble so he could introduce and convince Trump to choose Pence. Pence was in on this fakery as he and Mother were waiting for their arrival. I believe pious Pence is as dirty as they come.

The rest is history.

There were too many Russians mixed up with too many Trump advisors to be natural or normal.

There were/are too many lies and too many denials to be natural or normal.

I also believe many in the GOP, outside of Trump, (elected, or otherwise) who have colluded with Russia/Putin. We can begin with the Senate Majority Leader's unwillingness to work with President Obama to alert the American public once Intel brought Russia to their attention in 2016. He is still willing to look the other way to not only protect Trump, but his own hide.

I could go on, but I'm only upsetting myself ... literally.

Trump, his kids, cronies, the GOP, and many others are dangerous to our nation.

Our country, and the world, is full of good, highly intelligent people. I am certain these people outnumber the evil gangsters. But why does it seem they have the upper hand?

Is it because The Good believe in and follow the rules and the law, whereas evil does not?

Is it because The Good believe in and follow our Constitution, whereas evil uses our Constitution against us?

Sigh ... I'm just rambling ...

mnhtnbb

(31,408 posts)
88. 45 is a lying, traitorous, sack of $hit.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:59 AM
Mar 2019

For whatever reason, probably money, he is in Putin's pocket.

The Republican Senators and Representatives--definitely for money--have ignored their oaths to support and defend the Constitution.

They are all traitors.

Are we going to get in the streets? Are we going to remove these traitors?

It remains to be seen.

McKim

(2,412 posts)
89. Need the Evidence that is in the Mueller Report
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:00 PM
Mar 2019

I don’t know what to believe anymore! Belief is not a safe way to think. I think that there is so far much evidence of collusion but I would have to read the Mueller Report before firmly establishing an opinion. Sometimes I don’t know who to believe about this. I wish that MSNBC had focused more on what Democrats are going to do for our people once they are elected.

I want to see all the evidence! I want to know facts! I want the pee pee tapes out in the open too. I want to hold reality based opinions, but that is becoming harder.

Totally Tunsie

(10,885 posts)
90. Do bears poop in the woods?
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:02 PM
Mar 2019

Of course tRump connected, colluded, and conspired with the Russians. In fact, he's probably still doing so.

Lock him up!

niyad

(113,602 posts)
94. thank you for calling it the barr report. we do not know what is in the Mueller report,
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:04 PM
Mar 2019

and, yes, I do believe the tangerine tyrant conspired with russia. we have seen the evidence for ourselves.

bigbrother05

(5,995 posts)
97. Yes, the few "official" contacts confirmed mutual agreement
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:18 PM
Mar 2019

But not too many to prove a direct link. All the rest was just grunt work and heavy lifting.

Most of the contacts were between the campaign and operatives that were at least degree separated from the Russian Government. Any contacts with perpetrators (WikiLeaks, etc.) were conducted with people like Roger Stone that weren't officially linked to the campaign, but were longtime associates of multiple campaign principals (Manafort, Trump, etc.)

Given Putin's experience in the KGB, this smells like "The Americans" on steroids and that's why Strzok had to be slandered to remove him before he connected the dots.

If Watergate gave us "All the President's Men", this will yield a 3 season deal on Netflix to capture"Byzantium on the Potomac". (Moscow on the Potomac).

Niagara

(7,691 posts)
100. Absolutely
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:20 PM
Mar 2019

There's plenty of public evidence and I'll try to make it brief.


From President Pinocchio asking Russia for Hillary's "missing" emails, his praise of Putin and the Helsinki meeting.


The story changed at least 3 times about the trump tower/russia meetings.


The American people have the right to know what's in Mueller's Report.

at140

(6,110 posts)
103. It was Trump/Putin in 2016
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:32 PM
Mar 2019

Trump met and talked with Putin more than Pence. That is all the proof one needs.

However DOJ will let Trump skate through. Barr & Rosenstein will see to that. Rosenstein postponed his departure until the Report storm ends.

On to 2020 and vote early & often. Best opportunity to dump Trump.

jmowreader

(50,567 posts)
104. He absolutely did
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:34 PM
Mar 2019

This is like a newspaper correction. Follow along.

Monday’s Daily Bugle publishes a story Page 1 above the fold that says John Jones was seen in a sex shop buying three dildos and a whip three hours before the horrific rape in which the victim was found tied up with whip marks all over her and dildos stuck in all her orifices.

Two days later the Daily Bugle publishes on Page 11 (of a 12 page A section) a tiny “correction” that says John Jones went on vacation in Vietnam a week ago and he’s still there.

John Jones’ life is now ruined permanently.

In the instant case, the AG basically cleared Trump without reading the report. The real report might say Trump was in this shit up to his eye shadow, but no one’s gonna care.

CharleyDog

(758 posts)
106. Yes, all evidence points to conspiracy.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:36 PM
Mar 2019

and, OF COURSE Barr will cover it up. Of course Miss Huckster Sanders will lie for him, and Graham, and Republicans. They lied to get their SC beerster, and lied to get their tax windfall.

The dismay is the press believing this charade and NPR sadly shaking their head over Democrats huge "mistake" comparing it to Benghazi.

Of course they are now attacking Obama, and want Clinton investigated again.

That Dems didn't see this coming shows our faith in the rule of law, and are not yet prepared as hardened enemies of authoritarianism, dictators, and ruthless corruption of our democracy.

Support Dem candidates like never before, GOTV as if for your lives, your Mother Earth and all her innocent animals.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
111. Even if all the evidence is circumstantial, it is very strong...
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:46 PM
Mar 2019

Amd should not be swept under the rug for politicsl reasons. Instead, it should be reason to keep investigation open until the facts are known. With what is known already, the investigation should not be closed.

DarthDem

(5,257 posts)
107. Of Course!
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:37 PM
Mar 2019

I do indeed. Why else would we have gotten all of the cloak-and-dagger nonsense from these clowns in response?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
114. Yes, it's beyond obvious
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:51 PM
Mar 2019

and given that there are still 50+ sealed indictments and 17 *ACTIVE, ONGOING* investigations of the White House, we've got miles to go before we sleep

residentcynic

(32 posts)
115. Define "conspired"
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:52 PM
Mar 2019

We agree that Trump is a con man, a loud mouth, a braggart and is, at best, very ignorant of many, many facts, or, at worst, just a really unintelligent man. I've always wondered if the Russian government (or their agents/oligarchs, etc.) would be stupid enough to deal directly with him on anything. I find it more believable that his handlers, after either being paid (Manafort) or promised millions, did the dirty deeds, knowing that, with a little flattery and the hint of future deals, they could persuade Trump to reverse the Magnitisky Act and go along with Russia exerting its influence in other parts of the globe.

Did Trump KNOW about it? That's a hard one. I can't see how he didn't get some hints, but he does not strike me as a detail man. He is mentally disorganized. There are so many things he does not know (how to spell, what uranium is, that a Christmas SNL running in March must be a rerun). Does KNOWING mean he conspired? I don't know the legal definition, but I doubt it does. Did the Russians interfere. YES! Did the Russians interfere FOR Trump? Yes. The questions are a) Why? and b) Will they be stopped in 2020? I don't feel too good about either answers.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
122. I think it's a given that Trump & family knew Russia was working on winning the election for him.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 01:08 PM
Mar 2019

Because of what we DO know for a fact:

1. Russia operative contacted a Trump team member to say the Russians had, or were getting, some illegally obtained dirt on Hillary Clinton and/or the Democrats, and was the Trump team interested in a meeting about it?

2. Trump team member did email to Don Trump Jr. relaying that and asking if he wanted to attend a mtg w/the Russian operative. Trump Jr. responds "I LOVE IT!" and agreed to the meeting.

3. The meeting with the Russian operative was held in the summer of 2016 in Trump Tower, with at least Trump Jr., Kushner, and Manafort attending all or part of it. During hte meeting they discussed the adoption policy of Russia for Americans adopting Russian babies (that is, a U S sanctions matter, called The Magnitsky Act...which the U S instituted blocking Russia's ability to use certain global banks, in response to actions by Russia....and in retaliation, the Russians blocked the adoption of Russian babies by the U.S. The Magnitsky Act was a big pain for Putin such that he was very ticked over it, since that was a main source for Russian money globally.)

4. It is documented that Gen Flynn had promised the Russians that the administration would work on canceling The Magnitsky Act and maybe other sanctions.

5. When the summer 2016 meeting came to light, Trump Jr. was asked (forget by whom) the purpose of that mtg. It is learned that Trump was on AF 1 at the time the question was asked, and it was Trump who prepared the response to that question. The response was represented to come from Trump Jr., and said there was a short meeting about adoptions.

6. #5 shows that Trump mislead the authorities of the purpose of that meeting, as did Trump Jr. and Manafort & Kushner.

7. Trump team members had lied on their security forms multiple times in not disclosing that meeting (and other apparently more casual meetings).

8. It is later learned that there were over 100 communications between the Russians and the Trump team members before the election, none of which were disclosed by any team member of their security forms.


Because of the above, it is indisputable that Trump knew the Russians were working on helping Trump win or Clinton lose, whichever way you want to look at it. Apparently that doesn't rise to the level of conspiring with them or aiding and abetting? We haven't seen the report, so we can't say for sure at this time, but there will be no indictments for it.

But he KNEW. That's indisputable, based on known facts.

residentcynic

(32 posts)
123. No argument from me
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 01:28 PM
Mar 2019

I think, if you read my post, you're not saying anything too different from what I said, other than you are more confident than I am about Trump's mental capacity to "know" something. Trump seems so stupid when he's required to speak off the cuff that I really don't know what he knows (or understands). I just know it's not much.

Ponietz

(3,034 posts)
118. Yes, and I'm not moving on until I have answers
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:57 PM
Mar 2019

I cannot have any faith in 2020 election integrity otherwise. I’m not having their bullshit sandwich.

llmart

(15,557 posts)
121. Yes! Emphatically yes!
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 01:03 PM
Mar 2019

I have never and will never believe that he didn't. I also emphatically believe that at some point in time, could be long after I'm dead and gone, the whole truth will emerge. Repairing the damage to the soul of our country will be very difficult. This latest twist in the GOP criminality will only make a deeper divide in this nation. I also believe that we're on the precipice of a cliff and it won't be much longer before we go over the cliff into a free fall. I'm not really a negative person but the older I get the more realistic I am.

jpljr77

(1,004 posts)
126. Trump himself? No. Someone(s) in his campaign, and possibly family? Yes.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 03:16 PM
Mar 2019

I honestly think Trump was not expecting to win the election until about two weeks out, when the polling from the upper midwest started showing some interesting things and, of course, Comey's thing. But prior, some in the campaign were actively working to get him elected -- duh, their jobs -- and when the prospect of Hillary/Democratic emails came up, they pounced.

Runningdawg

(4,526 posts)
136. Yes
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 04:44 PM
Mar 2019

Not only that, he did it in full view of the American people when during the debate he said “Russia, if you're listening, I hope you’ll be able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,”
That is all the proof I have ever needed.

Silver Gaia

(4,547 posts)
137. Yes. I have NO DOUBTS whatsoever.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 04:59 PM
Mar 2019

I've seen and heard too much to think otherwise. I believe my own eyes and ears over the deceitful words of Barr, or anyone else.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
140. Yes because...
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 05:34 PM
Mar 2019

I think is goes back years if not decades and is in the murky world of tRump's finances. He is probably also a Russian asset though he may not be conscious of this.

As my 86 year old dad keeps reminding me. He's just not that bright.

The only thing we've learned from the Barr report is that their was not direct evidence of conscious criminal collusion. Beyond that we know only what we've pieced together from other sources.

JAD

(187 posts)
141. Abso effin' lutely! So does Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 05:51 PM
Mar 2019

Kevin McCarthy was the one that was recorded who said Putin pays trump "Swear to God". Yet Kevin is the one calling for Adam Schiff to step down. Schiff should play the recording on the House floor.

Meowmee

(5,164 posts)
143. Yes
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 05:58 PM
Mar 2019

I have no doubt about it whatsoever. I am amazed that so many people even here don’t even seem to care that much. It makes me ill to watch all of this happening. I have always known this country was full of fascists but this is beyond anything imaginable. The whole structure of the US gov is completely flawed and needs to be changed.

happy feet

(872 posts)
144. Yes, he cooperated.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:03 PM
Mar 2019

He knew of their offer from Don Jr and he asked for their help live at his rally. That same evening the Russians started hacking Hilary's emails. Plain as the nose on his face.

Progressive Jones

(6,011 posts)
145. As I have always believed,
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:06 PM
Mar 2019

Trump is possibly just a puppet, likely for radical right wing scum here in the States. It's a fucking coup.

Whatever happened, there are those who need to be neutralized asap. I hope there is sufficient evidence, somewhere, to be used to start getting some garbage off the streets of DC.

cp

(6,670 posts)
147. Yes
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:24 PM
Mar 2019

Putin's Kremlin and Trumpski are organized crime enterprises, and are very skilled at lying, talking in code, and burying the bodies. Racketeering charges (R.I.C.O) at the state level (hurray for New York!) will be Individual-1's ticket to prison.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
149. I think he used "plausible deniability" like many in power do when something shady benefits him.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:29 PM
Mar 2019

As Cohen said, there was a code. You knew what he was telling you to do without him saying it directly.

Also known as "cover the quarterback." Those around the figure 'take care of things" and don't "bother him with details," they just make sure that he's free to concentrate on the big picture.

He can state that he "didn't know" what was going on in the lower levels of the org, because he made sure his right hand man was the wall between him and any "distractions," even if he did step in to micromanage certain details and harrangue staffers that disappointed him.

Few strangers are allowed close - only trusted family members and longtime associates - like the fixer. His fans, whose only contact with him is seeing him ranting from the podium believe that he is the lone voice that speaks for them in a sea of corruption. They can't believe that he could possibly be what those who actually have dealt with him say about him.

This is how he came to believe his own hype, that anything that benefits him benefits the country, and he deserves this adulation.

That's how he can be the beneficiary of collusion, while keeping that arm's length - "Don't distract me with the details, but just make sure that my interests are being served, OK? Whatever damages my enemies is good for everyone, including those near me. Look at how popular I am. It would be a catastrophe for the country itself if I was to be smeared."

Narcissism allows him to think that even if it is collusion, it can't possibly be wrong. How could those crowds - all those people throwing money at him, even when they have so little be wrong?

So, yes, but in a very indirect way...

 

BlueFlorida

(1,532 posts)
167. That is exactly how the mafia operated
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 08:02 PM
Mar 2019

Boss to consigliere to Caporegimes to actual criminal action people.

However, one of these days, someone is likely to sing. Especially after Trump goes in for a financial crime and is in prison in NY.

Hassler

(3,393 posts)
150. He's a half-witting Russian asset. He believes what Vlad tells him.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:45 PM
Mar 2019

How do we know? Chump-in-Chief admitted it himself in Helsinki.

Moral Compass

(1,526 posts)
152. The contention that Mueller could find no evidence
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:53 PM
Mar 2019

Of collusion is absurd on the face of it.

I now wonder about the integrity, honesty, and independence of Mueller. I will go to my grave believing that the fix was in from the beginning.

 

sfwriter

(3,032 posts)
153. No doubt
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:58 PM
Mar 2019

Unprecedented contacts with Russians.

Trump says get emails, the Russians start hacking.

Roger Stone coordinates the release with Wikileaks.

Paul manafort provides targeting data in the form of internal campaign polling for the Russian disinformation campaign.

A meeting is set up under the pretense of handing over emails, Trump jr. says “if it’s what I think it is, I’m excited,” then proceeds to lie about the meeting, including his father in crafting the lies and Hope Hicks as well.

That situation alone creates Kompromat, after which, Trump harries our NATO allies and says Russia wouldn’t have hacked us in Helsinki.

Yeah, without getting into the likely money laundering or pee pee tapes, I feel confident. The case for obstruction is even stronger.

Efilroft Sul

(3,584 posts)
156. We will not be gaslighted by all that we read and saw these last several years.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 07:05 PM
Mar 2019

Trump, his family, his business circle, his administration, and his party are all in bed with an enemy power.

OnDoutside

(19,981 posts)
158. Yes, and likely followed the mafia model of hands off, with no electronic trail. He got all his
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 07:07 PM
Mar 2019

lackeys to do the dirty work.

BlueTsunami2018

(3,505 posts)
163. Of course he did.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 07:32 PM
Mar 2019

It may not have been with the Russian government officially but he certainly conspired with Russians.

There’s very little doubt about it.

dawn5651

(604 posts)
168. yes indeed
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 08:04 PM
Mar 2019

mueller was just funded for 6 more months....barr gets confirmed and less than 2 weeks later the mueller report is done....something is sure weird about that.

0rganism

(23,975 posts)
171. yep
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 08:18 PM
Mar 2019

why would i bother entertaining what a known lying GOP flak like AG Barr has to say? he shoots down his own summary's credibility simply by attaching his name to it.

practically speaking, the federal government cannot effectively pursue this line of inquiry while its target is in charge of the DOJ. our representatives will need to move on to investigating Trump's myriad other actionable transgressions.

doc03

(35,389 posts)
183. There is no doubt in my mind, if he didn't why has so many people lied
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 09:17 PM
Mar 2019

about it and why does he act so guilty.

stillcool

(32,626 posts)
184. Yes.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 09:18 PM
Mar 2019

I would go back and take a refresher course in all the Russia connections, but I don't have it in me.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
185. This is about as predictable as taking a poll of biologists as to whether evolution is true...
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 09:22 PM
Mar 2019

I'll just say the following:

We have a vast amount of documented evidence in the public view that people allied with Trump's campaign were offered a deal by go-betweens of the Russian executive. We know they did not dismiss this offer, and that they helped pass along helpful materials to those go-betweens. We know that the Russian government did, in fact, interfere massively in the 2016 election to help elect Trump (hell, we know that from Barr's own memo). We know that Donald Trump publicly called on the Russians to hack the Clinton campaign, that they changed the G.O.P. platform in a pro-Russian direction, and that Trump, upon taking office, attempted to lift sanctions against them. We know that Trump has met with Putin in private, sworn any interpreters to secrecy, seized their notes, and publicly taken Putin's side against his own Justice and State Departments.

I have been made to understand that there are a number of clear-cut crimes involved in accepting the assistance of any foreign government (whether that assistance is in terms of money or services rendered). In fact, I have also been made to understand that failing to report such offers is in itself a crime.

Then again, we also have the conclusion of the Mueller investigation that there was no basis for charging conspiracy or coordination on the part of anyone in the Trump campaign.

To state the obvious, there seems to be a clear disconnect here. The question is, which of the following was the case:

1) That we were misinformed about the law, and that such contacts, even if appearing questionable, weren't crimes after all?

2) That such documented incidents weren't as they were reported?

3) That, while there was some evidence for conspiracy/coordination, it wasn't strong or convincing enough to justify prosecution?

4) That, the way Comey and Rosenstein drew up the investigation's brief, the investigation was hamstrung by being limited to direct activity between official members of the Trump campaign (of which Don Jr. and Jared weren't a part) and official Russian government officials and employees (of which none of the motley crew of Putin's go-betweens they dealt with were), and that, thus, Mueller wasn't empowered to consider such contacts at all?

5) Some other factor(s) I haven't even thought of yet?

The problem, in fact, is that the only way we can figure out if any of these options is the case is by seeing the full report...and heaven knows if and when that will ever happen. So, for the moment, all I can say is that, while it sure looks like the Trump campaign had obvious unethical and possibly criminal dealings with Russia that were key in helping him get elected, efforts that I would consider a "conspiracy" in the common use of the word, I cannot make any firmer statements as to whether it rose to the level of a conspiracy according to the legal statutes until I see the report.

Mersky

(4,986 posts)
186. Yes.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 09:25 PM
Mar 2019

Yes, they colluded to the point of conspiracy. And I think Barr's memo is an illegitimate opinion and canned cover-up.

WyLoochka

(1,629 posts)
189. It's right there in front of us
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 09:45 PM
Mar 2019

He did, he does and he will continue to conspire with Putin, other members of the Russian government and the Russian oligarchy

against our interests and on behalf of theirs.

Leghorn21

(13,527 posts)
201. Da.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:30 PM
Mar 2019
President Donald Trump told Russian diplomats in an Oval Office meeting last week that his firing of "nut job" FBI Director James Comey had taken "great pressure" off of him, The New York Times reported Friday.

An American official read the comments, from a White House document summarizing the meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak, to The Times. White House press secretary Sean Spicer did not dispute the comments.

"I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job," Trump said, according to The Times. "I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off.”


President Donald Trump infuriated the US and Israeli intelligence communities when he disclosed details of a highly classified Israeli operation to Russian officials earlier this year.


Lavrov, who is also visiting Vietnam this week, said in comments carried by Russian news agencies on Monday that Russia believes that the U.S. ought to offer Pyongyang "security guarantees" for the disarmament deal to succeed. He also mentioned that "the U.S. is even asking our advice, our views on this or that scenario of" how the summit in Hanoi could pan out.


TalenaGor

(1,104 posts)
204. of course
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:49 PM
Mar 2019

You could also asked the same question a different way "do you trust Barr?"

Answer fuckno lol

VOX

(22,976 posts)
206. Fucking-hell YES he conspired. The S.O.B. meet with Putin ALONE, behind closed doors.
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 12:56 AM
Mar 2019

On top of the mountains of actual documentation. No American president has EVER pulled such egregious shit.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
207. He did it in full view of the public. No one gets a pass for "joking" here.
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 01:10 AM
Mar 2019

And our intel agencies say Russia DID help him. For one, they dropped the hacked emails 2 hours after the "grab their pussy" tape was exposed.

Also... "If it's what I say, I love it!" -Don Jr. email, in response to an offer of illegally-obtained dirt on daddy's opponent. Then he met with them and later conspired with others to lie about the purpose of the meeting.

Also... Manafort mysteriously changing the platform in the way Russia wanted.

Also... Manafort giving polling data to a Russian.

Also... Trump repeatedly trying to loosen sanctions on Russia.

Also... numerous Trump family members/associates caught lying about the same thing: Russia.

I think Mueller couldn't find the smoking gun and was afraid of the fight (for whatever reason). Trump saying he would happily testify under oath and then reneging is barely even getting mentioned.

To me, he's guilty AF on this. I am as certain as I can be without the benefit of actually seeing the full Mueller report, which we need released ASAP.

Aussie105

(5,444 posts)
216. Any person who doesn't know
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 07:26 AM
Mar 2019

that the job of the President is to serve the best interests of the people in his country, and fights against any influence that interferes with that, doesn't deserve the title.

It's fairly obvious Trump is motivated by self interest, would like to burn the Constitution and develop the USA into a full blown dictatorship.

The outside influences took advantage of Trump's weaknesses. The GOP stood by and either approved or looked the other way.

As Colbert pointed out the other night, that is one of 17 investigations Trump can now worry less about. Must feel good, right DON?

EndGOPPropaganda

(1,117 posts)
217. He's a traitor.
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 08:08 AM
Mar 2019

Whether that meets the legal definition of conspiracy, I don’t know. Let’s see the report.

Also see


 

UniteFightBack

(8,231 posts)
226. Obviously YES and rump's team made sure to leak everything out in drips so it would not be
Sun Mar 31, 2019, 12:01 PM
Mar 2019

such a big hit when the truth comes out. THEY LEAKED.

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
227. Personally, I believe he did and he did through others and knew about it.
Sun Mar 31, 2019, 12:07 PM
Mar 2019

but what I believe or anyone else believes isn't the point. There has to be solid evidence of that and the amoral pig deserves his due process, impeachment, conviction and removal from office.

Vote him out and get him indicted is the more likely scenario.

Kali

(55,026 posts)
228. I think he wanted to
Sun Mar 31, 2019, 12:09 PM
Mar 2019

but I am starting to believe it is just another venture he fucked up. and that is why the evidence seems to be inconclusive.

Terry_M

(745 posts)
231. And this is what's going on with global warming and Hillary on the other side...
Sun Mar 31, 2019, 03:16 PM
Mar 2019

...for those who are curious, it's just the same political tribalism, putting your tribe ahead any evidence as we have right here in this very thread.

It doesn't matter what the evidence says, it's tainted, it's biased - global warming is a myth.
I BELIEVE global warming is a hoax regardless of what experts you put in front of me and what mountains of evidence pile up.

It doesn't matter that there were dozens of investigations into Hillary that found nothing, she's definitely guilty of something, I mean come on!

---

Personally I do not believe he did or did not collude at the moment. It does feel like he's got to be guilty of a lot of things based on his behavior (the way he denies makes me feel like he's more guilty every time he does it), but I would like to see the 300+ pages (non-redacted/minimally redacted) of 2 years of investigations to form a more definite opinion. That way I can have a well informed opinion. That way I can use the best available data gathered by experts rather than just the way I feel to land on a conclusion about something that I am inherently biased on (because I hate the guy). Maybe the weight of the evidence will go in one direction. Or maybe it will end up going in the other.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
233. Of course. I knew something was wrong the night he won
Fri Apr 5, 2019, 10:39 AM
Apr 2019

I'm just glad that Obama investigated after the election and got the ball rolling on exposing Russia.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes or No, Do you still b...