General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPoll: Democrats want to abolish Electoral College, Republicans want to keep it
Americans are deeply divided along partisan lines over whether the Electoral College, the state-by-state voting mechanism set up by the U.S. Constitution to choose the president, should be abolished.
In a Hill-HarrisX poll released Tuesday of 1,000 registered voters, 44 percent of respondents said that they wanted to get rid of the Electoral College while 37 percent said they wanted to keep it. Nineteen percent of respondents said they were unsure what to do.
A majority of Democratic voters, 60 percent, said they supported abolishing the Electoral College and allowing whoever receives the most votes nationwide to become president. Just 20 percent said they wanted to keep the current system. Twenty-one percent were unsure.
The voting system has become a hot-button issue among some Democratic activists in recent years after Trump became the second Republican to become president after losing the national popular vote in 2016. George W. Bush won the 2000 election despite receiving fewer votes nationwide than his opponent, Al Gore.
https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/435816-poll-republicans-support-electoral-college-while-democrats-want
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)if democrats are able to sweep enough trifectas to get it done.
BigDemVoter
(4,157 posts)Without it, they would have lost two dumb-fuck presidents over 16 years. . .
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)It is NOT a litmus test for me for a candidate if the primaries are undecided when it comes to my state.
budkin
(6,721 posts)Like, ever.
msongs
(67,459 posts)titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)And frankly so would the Dems.
JHB
(37,163 posts)Before the 2000 election, Bush's people were mapping out a strategy in case he won the popular vote but lost the electoral vote.
https://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/bush-set-fight-electoral-college-loss-article-1.881690
***
The universe of people who would be targeted by this insurrection is small - the 538 currently anonymous folks called electors, people chosen by the campaigns and their state party organizations as a reward for their service over the years. If you bother to read the small print when you're in the booth, you'll notice that when you vote for President you're really selecting presidential electors who favor one candidate or the other. Generally, these electors are not legally bound to support the person they're supposedly pledged to when they gather in the various state capitals to cast their ballots on Dec. 18. The rules vary from state to state, but enough of the electors could theoretically switch to Bush if they wanted to - if there was sufficient pressure on them to ratify the popular verdict. And what would happen if the "what if" scenario came out the other way? "Then we'd be doing the same thing Bush is apparently getting ready for," says a Gore campaign official. "They're just further along in their contingency thinking than we are. But we wouldn't lie down without a fight, either."
Well, the Gore people didn't count on just how shameless the Bushies were, not on Joe Lieberman.
Takket
(21,640 posts)The amendment would be passed and ratified twelve hours after the winner was declared.