Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMueller report 'undoubtedly' proves conspiracy, obstruction: [just not enough] Judge Napolitano
Trump is on a cruel rampage now--it will only get worse IMH0
Link to tweet
Mueller report 'undoubtedly' proves conspiracy, obstruction: Judge Napolitano
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/mueller-report-undoubtedly-proves-conspiracy-obstruction-judge-napolitano
By Julia Limitone
Published March 27, 2019 PoliticsFOXBusiness
Once Mueller report's 700 pages come out Democrats will have a field day: Judge Napolitano
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano on the political fallout from the Mueller report.
The Mueller probe may not be over just yet. Judge Andrew Napolitano said there positively "some" proof of Trump-Russia conspiracy and obstruction of justice in the 700 page report.
In the 700 page summary of the 2 million pages of raw evidence there is undoubtedly some evidence of a conspiracy and some evidence of obstruction of justice, he told FOX Business Neil Cavuto Opens a New Window. . Just not enough evidence.
MORE FROM FOXBUSINESS.COM...
MUELLER REPORT: THESE KEY OFFICIALS MUST BE QUESTIONED, REP. JIM JORDAN SAYS Opens a New Window.
HOWARD SCHULTZ: MUELLER PROBE A PRIME EXAMPLE OF GOVERNMENT DYSFUNCTION Opens a New Window.
Judge Napolitano said that prosecutors ethically are not able to bring charges unless they can prove it without a reasonable doubt. But Attorney General William Barr never indicated it.
So once the 700 pages comes out, and this is my criticism of the Attorney General, he shouldnt have even tipped his hands on this the Democrats Opens a New Window. will have and other Trump opponents will have a field day with what is in there, he said. If there were no evidence of conspiracy and no evidence of obstruction the attorney general would have told us sohe didnt........................
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 834 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mueller report 'undoubtedly' proves conspiracy, obstruction: [just not enough] Judge Napolitano (Original Post)
riversedge
Mar 2019
OP
Look at that...he used the same word that Schiff used/uses...UNDOUBTEDLY. nt
UniteFightBack
Mar 2019
#4
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)1. Tell us, Andrew
How do YOU know how long the Mueller report is, how many pages of evidence there are, and what's in all of it? Surely you didn't pull those numbers out of your ass?
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)2. he's pulling that 700 page # out of the air.
riversedge
(70,299 posts)7. I wondered where that number came from but I have been
out all day and have not caught the news.
lame54
(35,321 posts)3. Just not enough evidence...
Meanwhile our overstuffed prisons are full of people convicted or plead with circumstantial evidence
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)4. Look at that...he used the same word that Schiff used/uses...UNDOUBTEDLY. nt
C_U_L8R
(45,020 posts)5. There's plenty
Mueller just couldn't charge a sitting President.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,655 posts)6. The burden of proof for indictment is not "beyond a reasonable doubt"
It is much lower bar, however prosecutors may decline to indict if they dont think they have a
Chance to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.