Send it to Rachel website. For those that may not know, it is a secured site where people can safely leak to her, her team then vets the info and she will sometimes do a story on it. I think of the crazy stuff she likely can't use, but is real info.

she is my cant miss msnbc show of the day. if i miss her, i cant wait till the next morning, i have to stay up for the repeat. this is very hard on my body, but i cant help it.

i look forward to her reporting on the impeachment hearings.

The show is actually only 40 min long minus the commercials... I like the way it flows. She presents a history of a topic then how it relates to todays news... Love it...
m

we forget so quickly.
i think this is the part that a lot of people consider to be boring yada yada yada. which tells you a lot about how we got here.

I need the people who are smart enough to be on her show to read it and explain.

she gets the best.

Until I realized I could watch her show the next day on the NBC channel on my Roku.

I'll wait for the ACTUAL Mueller report to come out before judging.

years ago. I watch her show an hour after it is on, on YouTube.

Usually within an hour, some kind soul has uploaded the whole show to YouTube. Here in Australia, I watch it at about 3pm the following day. Bonus is a TRMS on a Saturday afternoon.

on youtube. and on msnbc.com

no cable since 2007

I like, with big gestures and facial expressions the 'President Trump actually said that!'

[Have to admit, I turn the Friday night Rachel whoever sub . . . off].

After the first week, Republicans were beating their chests and demanding the firing of newspeople and Chairman Schiff.

Now, after two weeks, we can add their first week's actions as an element of the obstruction of justice,case.

No wonder the Mueller grand jury is still meeting. They aren't convening just to exonerate people and not-indict someone.

Then I watch her first chance I get and always watch her without commercials interupting the flow of conversation.

They gloss over pertinent facts and appear unable to sustain their attention over time. They go for the easy and sensational headline then quickly move on to the next easy and sensational headline. We are served a banquet of journalistic junk food. Rachel's thoughtful and in-depth analysis is a very welcome change. I make it a point to listen to her program first.

But for those times we're out, I really like to watch if I'm not too tired from the activity. It's got to be a lot harder for folks where her shows run 9 pm and midnight.

They are not doing their jobs; she is.

She is spot on when she says.. "Don't listen to what they say. Look at what they do"...
That is their truth...
m

maybe because I only watch Nicolle Wallace and Rachel. The rest of cable news is pretty much right wing talking points, why get upset about them? There aren't many "liberal" reporters on cable news, if I want liberal other than those 2 I listen to Sirius radio.

Why wouldn't the right attack Rachel seeing as her show has hit the top of the charts, it's what Republicans do.

I find Nicolle Wallace far more informative and she gets the best guests on her show and she doesn't take 5 minutes to ask a question or tell a story. Why isn't the right attacking Nicolle, or are they, I don't watch right wing propaganda. Rachel needs to lose the giggle when she is talking about serious issues. Other than that, I try not to miss her show, she is the 2nd best liberal cable news anchor on TV. Just kidding, both Rachel and Nicolle are great.