Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 02:40 PM Aug 2012

Okay, so assuming Obama wins and Congress stays the same...

...will the debt limit be raised? Will the government get shut down for six months or a year?

The only reason the debt limit was raised last time was that is was sold to the Teaocrats as a necessary step to getting Obama out of office. The need to play ball in order to get Obama out has been what has been keeping a lot of these loons in the general vicinity of planet Earth.

If Obama wins they will rebel against their own party leadership. Boehnner will be replaced by Cantor, and the first time Cantor does anything halfway responsible he will be deposed in turn. Rand Paul will filibuster the debt ceiling.

I think they may well commit Party suicide.

And I believe that a fair amount of Romney's support from pragmatic big business is mindful of that... that "mainstream" Republicanism has become a protection racket. Romney can argue, behind closed doors, of course, that only he can insure that "the spice will flow" (a Dune reference)... that with a Republican president the RW can be co-opted into business as usual (in the way they supported Bush's massive deficit spending and stimulus programs)

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

pinto

(106,886 posts)
2. Optimist point of view - The public is totally fed up with gridlock in Congress,
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 02:46 PM
Aug 2012

and Obama's second term and the growing vocal complaints from the public may mean a different ball of wax for the next Congress.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
3. Yes, but people only get to vote on a tiny part of Congress
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 02:50 PM
Aug 2012

The public can declaim gridlock all day long, but as long as they perceive it as being caused by the 434 Representatives and 98 Senators that somebody else elects they will act the same as always. (More and more pissed off, but returning their popular local officials to Washington with regularity.)

pinto

(106,886 posts)
5. Agree that the electorate has a share of responsibility here, i.e. it starts with the vote.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 03:17 PM
Aug 2012

I support casting a vote, actively campaigning for the most progressive Dem in any and all local / state races. Also realize there are some tactical political concerns, at times. Our part, imo, is being involved in the whole process, not just the election day appearance.

Not always easy for folks who have to juggle jobs, family responsibilities etc. But we all can play some part as we're able.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
4. Maybe with the pressure of re-election gone, it will be easier for Obama and the GOP
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 02:54 PM
Aug 2012

to reach a budget compromise. And that's not necessarily a good thing.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
8. We'd be up Shit Creek
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 06:04 AM
Aug 2012

Republicans come together when they have to. At best we would get two years of gridlock, then the Republicans would probably gain seats in the mid-terms. Then, the historical precedence is that the Republicans would take back the White House (and more Congressional seats) in 2016, meaning that not only would we not have a paddle, we wouldn't even have a freakin' canoe on our journey down the Unsanitary Tributary.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Okay, so assuming Obama w...