General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWell, so much for all men being created equal . . .
In the last Senate election Texas cast a total of just over 8,000,000 votes .
Wyoming cast a total of just under 200,000.
A senate vote in Wyoming carries 40 times the weight of one in Texas.
So the senate representation for Wyoming is 80 times that of Texas.
Yeah, it's time . . .
dumbcat
(2,120 posts)It's unconstitutional.
I was just continuing in the vein of the OP.
Uh, no. The Senate representation for Wyoming is exactly the same as Texas. Two senators each. Exactly as designed.
The line between satire and insanity is a blurred one these days.
maxsolomon
(33,400 posts)"Exactly as designed" just like the 2nd Amendment, right?
The disproportionate representation of the Senate has established a rural tyranny over an urban nation.
The fiction of our "States" being separate countries united by choice is the actual joke at this point.
dumbcat
(2,120 posts)Are you telling me all my school year's civics and history classes were lying? It wasn't designed that way?
Oh, the humanity!
maxsolomon
(33,400 posts)It wasn't "designed" to fuck over California and disproportionately empower Wyoming. They didn't exist.
California might want to consider splitting into 100 states to "design" a fix: the 5 States of LA County, the State of SF, the State of Marin, etc.
Bettie
(16,124 posts)is the house. We need the number of representatives increased significantly so that there is more equal representation there.
I think (but am not certain) that can be changed without a constitutional amendment.
Set a number (probably the population of the state with the least population and use that (rounded) as the base number for determining the size of congressional districts.
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)majority control of both houses of Congress and put a Democrat in the White House. That's the immediate issue, and the thing we should be looking at. How do we do that? The rest will have to wait, quite frankly, until we do. And if we don't, the Republicans might be the ones to make changes. That is a very real and present danger.
2020!
Bettie
(16,124 posts)republicans find a way to stop all progress of any kind in the Senate.
I don't get how one (R) senator can bring everything to an utter standstill and Democrats can't even slow things down.
Yeah, I'm very frustrated these days. Seeing no hope, no light at the end of the tunnel.
I'll work and vote, but I don't believe that we'll have a fair election.
ETA: and in context of the Senate and congress, the house number is an easier nut to crack!
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)we can overwhelm any attempts to screw with elections. We need every non-voter who is on our side to get out and vote. If we do that, we cannot lose. Turnout matters. Help make it matter in 2020!
That's all I can say. If you want to see light at the end of the tunnel, keep driving. Don't stop.
maxsolomon
(33,400 posts)Now it is gone for Judicial Nominees.