General Discussion

kentuck

(111,099 posts) Mon Apr 15, 2019, 02:17 PM Apr 2019

From time to time, I switch over to FOX News to see how they are covering the news.

This morning, I wanted to see how they were covering Mayor Pete Buttigieg. They reported that he invited his husband on stage with him. But they did not report that they kissed. But I could see the direction they were going. They know their audience.

Also, they said that Rudy Giuliani already had 140 pages of response for the Mueller report but that he was going to shorten it to about 50 pages....

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

From time to time, I switch over to FOX News to see how they are covering the news. (Original Post) kentuck Apr 2019 OP

I appreciate reports from those with stronger stomachs gratuitous Apr 2019 #1

They're covering the fire. nt Raine Apr 2019 #2

A 140 Page Response to a Report They Haven't Seen? jayfish Apr 2019 #3

I think they've seen it. padah513 Apr 2019 #5

They started working on the response months ago MiniMe Apr 2019 #6

Thanks for doing that kentuck Caliman73 Apr 2019 #4

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)

1. I appreciate reports from those with stronger stomachs

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 02:19 PM

Apr 2019

Media Matters for America is also a good source for Foxian travesties.

Raine

(30,540 posts)

2. They're covering the fire. nt

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 02:27 PM

Apr 2019

jayfish

(10,039 posts)

3. A 140 Page Response to a Report They Haven't Seen?

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 02:30 PM

Apr 2019

A bit odd, no?

padah513

(2,503 posts)

5. I think they've seen it.

Reply to jayfish (Reply #3)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 02:56 PM

Apr 2019

I bet they looked at it right after Barr testified.

MiniMe

(21,716 posts)

6. They started working on the response months ago

Reply to jayfish (Reply #3)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 04:34 PM

Apr 2019

Rudy Said. Which to me means they were preparing for anything that might have been in the report. Would love to see their original repsponse.

"he didn't really launder that money...."

Caliman73

(11,738 posts)

4. Thanks for doing that kentuck

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 02:33 PM

Apr 2019

I personally could not do it, knowing that they obviously distort, do not report, or flat out lie about information. Their audience lives an a world without actual information. That is the only way that they can maintain the viewership.

Reply to this discussion