Conspiracism: The Conspiracy to End Democracy
Why conspiracy theories are getting more absurd and harder to refute
In fact, what were seeing now, according to Rosenblum and her co-author Russell Muirhead, is more conspiracism and less theory. Which is to say, the purpose of conspiracy theories is no longer to explain reality or offer some account of the world; instead, the point is to erode trust in public figures or institutions.
She points to the recent Pizzagate conspiracy as a perfect example. This was a fake news story alleging that Hillary Clinton and her former campaign chair, John Podesta, ran a child sex ring in the basement of a pizzeria in Washington, DC. It was totally fabricated, but it proliferated enough online that a man eventually showed up at the restaurant with an assault rifle and fired at least one shot.
Rosenblum believes this new form of conspiracism amounts to a direct attack on the foundations of liberal democracy and what she calls knowledge-producing institutions. As conspiracism takes root in our politics, she says, we lose our capacity to deliberate about the direction of the country. And ultimately, democracy itself becomes impossible.
And the author fingers our "compulsively conspiracist president" as a major risk to democracy. Which isn't exactly an "aha!" moment. But the definition of "conspiracy theory" discussed- "an attempt to take a complicated event and fit it into a broader narrative framework" is particularly useful because, as the author responds:
Im so glad you said that, because Wikipedia actually defines a conspiracy theory as a false threat of a conspiracy, and thats not true. There are both progressive conspiracy theories that are not only true but have advanced American democracy, and there are total fabulations that are pure inventions.
She advances the documented conspiracies by, among others, the tobacco industry and the fossil fuel industry, to cast doubt on medical research and climate science, as examples of the former, and the 'faked moon landing' and 'pizzagate' as examples of the latter.
There's a nice discussion of the psychology of needing to attribute events to some form of agency as a major underlying mechanism for the tendency to formulate (and believe) conspiracy theories. But differentiating between the normal tendency to strive for explanation, and a mindset that is rooted in seeing the world and events in terms of
enemies is the 'conspiracist' model.
It's worth a read. I may get the book.
interestedly,
Bright