Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,098 posts)
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 05:24 PM Apr 2019

Do you think Republicans really want to go thru an impeachment proceeding?

I don't.

I don't think they want their dirty laundry out in the public.

They are attempting to convince Democrats that it will backfire on them if they proceed. Remember what happened to them when they impeached Bill Clinton, they remind us.

But, in my opinion, they are just putting up a big front.

The last thing they want is to have Donald Trump impeached.

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do you think Republicans really want to go thru an impeachment proceeding? (Original Post) kentuck Apr 2019 OP
I laugh because Clinton was impeached for lying about a BJ kimbutgar Apr 2019 #1
Yep. If Bill Clinton deserves it, McDonald certainly does. forgotmylogin Apr 2019 #34
Surprise WA-03 Democrat Apr 2019 #2
And the usual media hacks are in on it too. rufus dog Apr 2019 #3
absolutely. barbtries Apr 2019 #4
You know what I think. Solomon Apr 2019 #5
I think that's a misread. We aren't impeaching yet because Pelosi doesn't want to. marylandblue Apr 2019 #6
getting investigations done first is a sensible strategy flyingfysh Apr 2019 #10
That is true. Oppaloopa Apr 2019 #19
Nailed it! .. nt at140 Apr 2019 #26
The reasoning behind NOT impeaching isn't well stated "lets investigate more" isn't a well grounded uponit7771 Apr 2019 #41
There's an awful lot missing from that report, but most importantly marylandblue Apr 2019 #43
The planet where the politics where historically in their favor? Impeachment hurt the DNC and uponit7771 Apr 2019 #44
Life I said, this isn't 1974 or 1998. It also isn't 2000. marylandblue Apr 2019 #45
Or 1860 something ? There's historical precedence for what happens to the party of the president who uponit7771 Apr 2019 #46
We've had 3 impeachments and 1 near impeachment marylandblue Apr 2019 #47
In all 2 party of the impeached or resignation before impeachment the outcome to the party of uponit7771 Apr 2019 #48
From experience .... Shoonra Apr 2019 #7
I do not believe Pence could be elected president in 2020 if he was running... bsiebs Apr 2019 #12
Mikey Pants and Mother Couldn't Even Win Indiana--They Loath Him! DoctorJoJo Apr 2019 #22
Neither do I. smirkymonkey Apr 2019 #25
Need more investigations. As many as Benghazi. keithbvadu2 Apr 2019 #13
It doesn't really matter about the Senate.... paleotn Apr 2019 #33
So the Republicans are in charge? McKim Apr 2019 #39
+1, this makes no sense and Clinton impeachment netted no control of congress in 98 ... uponit7771 Apr 2019 #42
none of them do. how they react depends on how worried we democrats can make em Kurt V. Apr 2019 #8
Goals Roy Rolling Apr 2019 #9
Right now, yes. gulliver Apr 2019 #11
Once impeachment gets rolling, and their bad deeds begin to be revealed, they will NCjack Apr 2019 #14
How many times do I have to say this? watoos Apr 2019 #15
This at140 Apr 2019 #28
Clinton was impeached kozar Apr 2019 #16
The House Indicted, The Senate Failed to CONVICT! DoctorJoJo Apr 2019 #21
ty,,you are correct kozar Apr 2019 #27
Share it all, make it public. TNNurse Apr 2019 #17
They're too afraid of their crazy base and getting primaried. n/t cynatnite Apr 2019 #18
It's a bully's bluff and should be called...nt prodigitalson Apr 2019 #20
No. yuiyoshida Apr 2019 #23
They are afraid of it because if the tables were turned they would impeach in a heartbeat yaesu Apr 2019 #24
Yes. K & R warmfeet Apr 2019 #29
You saw how they looked when Schiff called them out for thinking it was OK about tRump.. PeeJ52 Apr 2019 #30
I'm thinking of that moment too. Some literally hung their heads Kurt V. Apr 2019 #32
I suspect 12 months ago it would have been a disaster but that's before we had cstanleytech Apr 2019 #31
Neither do our Democratic leaders is seems. progressoid Apr 2019 #35
oh absolutely Locrian Apr 2019 #36
They won't have to Trumpocalypse Apr 2019 #37
I think we should wait artislife Apr 2019 #38
Maybe Nancy has a plan to get closer to the election Bluesaph Apr 2019 #40

kimbutgar

(21,155 posts)
1. I laugh because Clinton was impeached for lying about a BJ
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 05:30 PM
Apr 2019

Fat Donnie colluded with a hostile foreign government to help him win the presidency. Sorry his action are WAY more treasonous than lying about a bj. Repukes know this and are using the narrative it will get fat Donnie re elected in 2020. Nothing could be farther from the truth. When everything comes out from the release of his tax returns, using his office to enrich his business and of course the truth coming out the election was fixed in his direction. Impeachment might not be the only remedy the American people will want!

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
3. And the usual media hacks are in on it too.
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 05:44 PM
Apr 2019

Dems need to get aggressive. When Chuck Todd or some other hack leads with, "are you risking overplaying your hand?" The immediate response should be, we have a report that shows tRump and his campaign working along with a hostile foreign power to influence his election, then they denied the involvement and obstructed justice.

When the hack says it is not proven or that the report stated that they may not have known they are breaking the law, then fucking unload, and I mean unload. "So Chuck, you can't be arguing that Don Jr. or Jared are too ignorant of the law but the latter is in charge of our MidEast policy." Chuck you really can't be saying that.

barbtries

(28,798 posts)
4. absolutely.
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 05:49 PM
Apr 2019

they impeached clinton on the flimsiest possible grounds. trump is a clear and present danger.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
6. I think that's a misread. We aren't impeaching yet because Pelosi doesn't want to.
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 05:52 PM
Apr 2019

And it's not like she is easily frightened. She would do it if she thought it would help.

You know, Trump still doesn't have a nickname for her...

flyingfysh

(1,990 posts)
10. getting investigations done first is a sensible strategy
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 06:35 PM
Apr 2019

With public hearings and all the dirt coming out, the country will be clamoring for impeachment. So it looks like Pelosi is carrying out a sensible strategy.

This is what got Nixon on the way to impeachment. At some point, people were bombarding their congresspeople with demands for impeachment.

Trump doesn't have a nickname for Pelosi, probably because he is scared of her.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
41. The reasoning behind NOT impeaching isn't well stated "lets investigate more" isn't a well grounded
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 02:28 AM
Apr 2019

... reasoning relative to what the Mueller report already spells out.

In 6 months what are they going to find out that's new?

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
43. There's an awful lot missing from that report, but most importantly
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 02:55 AM
Apr 2019

You are missing the political needle that must be threaded. If we are going to do it, we need to build the popular support to actually take him out completely. People keep comparing him to Clinton or Nixon, but he isn't them, he is Trump and this isn't the same country it was in 1974 or 1998.

My reasoning is grounded solely in political calculations, which don't always have to be "well grounded," they simple need to be expedient. My view is that we'd be worse off if the Senate doesn't convict than if we never impeached at all.

Arguments based in some sort of moral or legal imperative are themselves not well grounded. You are asking 435 politicians to ignore politics? On what planet could that ever happen?

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
44. The planet where the politics where historically in their favor? Impeachment hurt the DNC and
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 04:01 AM
Apr 2019

... didn't give them control of either house or senate and then another L in 2000 even though I thought we were cheated.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
46. Or 1860 something ? There's historical precedence for what happens to the party of the president who
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 08:22 AM
Apr 2019

... gets impeached.

Its usually not good politically.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
47. We've had 3 impeachments and 1 near impeachment
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 08:55 AM
Apr 2019

It's not a big sample set. We've never had an authoritarian populist in power. By all the old political rules his many scandals and deficiencies should have stopped him long before the first primary. That right there tells you we are not dealing with a normal President and the normal rules don't apply.

That's how the Hitlers and Mussolinis of the world take power. They break all the rules, their followers reward them for it, and their opponents vainly try to use the old rules to reign him in. Their ability to break gives them power, so impeachment without conviction while just prove he really can break rules and get away with it.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
48. In all 2 party of the impeached or resignation before impeachment the outcome to the party of
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 09:01 AM
Apr 2019

... the impeached hasn't been positive.

3 times of impeachment related activity, 3 negative effects to the party of the impeached ...

There are a couple of people arguing that republicans keeping control of the senate and the house by a little less is loss ... or that's like saying patriots winning by 10 vs 14 is a loss... that doesn't make sense.

The "normal rules don't apply" because people aren't applying them, I've seen this before ... usually someone has to hit the bully in the mouth, bust his lip and show everyone else the bully bleeds like all other humans and people start applying rules to the .... human.



Shoonra

(521 posts)
7. From experience ....
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 06:29 PM
Apr 2019

... Impeaching Trump won't have a desired effect UNLESS there are some Republicans aligned. I expect that getting a 2/3 vote to convict from the Senate (Art. I, sec. 3, cl. 6) is virtually impossible, but in failure it backfires if it is seen as breaking strictly along party lines.

I would suggest waiting until one or two more investigations can be added to the Mueller Report, to demonstrate that the crimes are of multiple kinds and the evidence comes through more than one filter.

Keep in mind, that winning means Pence becomes President. Evidently the Trump people made a point of a whispering campaign last year that Pence would be even less palatable than Trump, as a sort of impeachment insurance.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
25. Neither do I.
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 07:09 PM
Apr 2019

Pence is the least of our worries and should not even figure into the impeachment debate.

paleotn

(17,930 posts)
33. It doesn't really matter about the Senate....
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 07:43 PM
Apr 2019

and this isn't just about shitler. It's about crushing the Rethuglicans in 2020. Dig in and build the case. It will take months, but keeps the story alive, hearing after hearing, eating up the 24/7 news cycle week after week. Do you seriously think Mueller's report is the
end of this story? There is so much dirt to dig up and Mueller only scratched the surface. He provided a road map. Dig it up. Implicate the Rethuglicans in Congress...Burr, Nunes, Graham... the whole lot of them. Burn them all....just in time for the 2020 elections.

McKim

(2,412 posts)
39. So the Republicans are in charge?
Mon Apr 22, 2019, 11:00 PM
Apr 2019

So there is no impeachment in the house because some republicans in the senate won’t vote for it?
Pence is not the kind of person that can get elected, his wooden and strange persona has none of the charisma of Trump!

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
42. +1, this makes no sense and Clinton impeachment netted no control of congress in 98 ...
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 02:32 AM
Apr 2019

... dems netted 4 seats in the house Whoopdy do ... and it didn't help the democratic party after Johnson was impeach and didn't help republicans in 74.

I don't know where people are getting their historical facts from on impeachment

Roy Rolling

(6,917 posts)
9. Goals
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 06:33 PM
Apr 2019

We want Trump and others removed from power. Impeachment is just the very first formal step, not the final outcome.

Democrats must have the full redacted report, the full evidence, and Mueller's narrative to complete an airtight case for removal. Either by resignation or impeachment. But when Democrats start up the no-Trump train, it will have enough fuel to carry it all the way to Removaltown.

And subpoenas are the first sign Democrats are fueling up the no-Trump train 🚂. But they should immediately start fueling the train with hearings, indictments, and PR campaigns. Now.

It's obvious delay is the only tactic Republicans have, and zero strategy at all.

gulliver

(13,182 posts)
11. Right now, yes.
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 06:36 PM
Apr 2019

They don't want us to keep building up our case. They want us to act before we have the strength to win built up.

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
14. Once impeachment gets rolling, and their bad deeds begin to be revealed, they will
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 06:38 PM
Apr 2019

attack The MFer-#45.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
15. How many times do I have to say this?
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 06:43 PM
Apr 2019

Barr will never release grand jury testimony unless we impeach. All of the dirt on Trump is in the grand jury evidence.

kozar

(2,118 posts)
16. Clinton was impeached
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 06:43 PM
Apr 2019

Last edited Sun Apr 21, 2019, 07:22 PM - Edit history (1)

by the house, but the Senate did not convict. And the Republicans remained in control the following election cycle. That is what they are afraid of.




Koz

yaesu

(8,020 posts)
24. They are afraid of it because if the tables were turned they would impeach in a heartbeat
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 07:09 PM
Apr 2019

they wouldn't hesitate for a second, they would know that the evidence would be overwhelming.

 

PeeJ52

(1,588 posts)
30. You saw how they looked when Schiff called them out for thinking it was OK about tRump..
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 07:24 PM
Apr 2019

They are going to have to say it is OK for weeks and weeks of public hearings about tRump during impeachment. I don't think they want to have to defend tRump in public, especially just before an election.

cstanleytech

(26,293 posts)
31. I suspect 12 months ago it would have been a disaster but that's before we had
Sun Apr 21, 2019, 07:37 PM
Apr 2019

Muellers report and Barr attempting to bury it.
Now though I think the time is right because while he might not be convicted in the Senate we can use every Repugnant that votes not to convict against them and every other Repugnant in the next election.
How? By taking it and painting them as the party of corruption and we hammer them over and over on it and we force them to go on the defense for a change which is what they are weak on as we saw in a number of states where they had to spend millions to hold onto seats that they would have won easily 10 years ago.

Locrian

(4,522 posts)
36. oh absolutely
Mon Apr 22, 2019, 04:00 PM
Apr 2019

I see them all the time saying: we can't WAIT for impeachment! We want complete transparency because turnip is completely innocent and has nothing to hide. That it will in FACT help increase his poll numbers and prove how articulate and popular he is! MAGA!! This will be GREAT for us!

Bluesaph

(703 posts)
40. Maybe Nancy has a plan to get closer to the election
Tue Apr 23, 2019, 01:48 AM
Apr 2019

...forcing republicans and Trump to stay on defense instead of campaigning.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you think Republicans ...