General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow the Intercept Is Fueling the Democratic Civil War
Founded in 2014 by muckraking national security journalists Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras and Jeremy Scahill, the Intercept is still best-known for its first incarnation as an obsessive anti-surveillance reporting enterprise, and an activist voice for privacy and civil libertiesmore anti-government than partisan. It built its reputation by publishing stories based on top-secret National Security Agency documents leaked by Edward Snowden; it also exposed the controversial U.S. drone strike program and revealed how a British intelligence agency sought to digitally surveil every Internet user.
But in the past few years, and especially in the aftermath of the 2016 campaign, the Intercept has taken a sharp turn into party politics. With a hard-charging Washington bureau chief, Ryan Grim, driving its political coverage, the Intercept has taken a more classic gotcha approach to campaign reporting, and landed in a unique spot in the media ecosystemas the loudest voice attacking Democrats from the left.
As the party grapples with fractures emerging in its coalition, the Intercept is a crowbar working those fractures apart, probing hard at fault lines like criminal justice reform, Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, racial justice and corporate funding of candidates like Kelly. The outlet has become a routine headache for the Democratic establishment and its leadership. It published a leaked recording of then-House Democratic Whip now-Majority Leader Steny Hoyer pressuring a progressive Colorado primary candidate to drop out of a race. By far its favorite target has been the party organization that works to elect Democrats to the House, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which the Intercept has repeatedly pilloried for seeking to kneecap a new wave of insurgent lefties. In a March story, the Intercept hammered the DCCC for moving to blacklist consultants working with primary challengers to Democratic incumbents.
The Intercept has also offered a platform to the candidates it favors. During the 2016 presidential primary, the site was one of the few outlets to take Bernie Sanders seriously early on, and its coverage of the 2018 midterms helped to promote progressive outsiders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/24/the-intercept-greenwald-grim-profile-media-politics-left-liberal-226710
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Thekaspervote
(32,769 posts)okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)agenda is anti-American and whatever helps tear America apart. Interesting that they largely overlook Trump and the RNC.
It should say everything that anyone who claims to be from the left spends more time promoting Russia's pet causes (most recently VZ) than the left's.
I know part of their money comes from an Iranian, I won't be surprised for a second to find out the rest comes from a Russian.
Kaleva
(36,304 posts)We seem pretty unified to me.
Takket
(21,570 posts)if Dems were all mindless automatons who spoke off the same talking points and had the same opinions as their billionaire leaders THEY WOULD BE RETHUGS.
we should be happy Dems offer us a variety of choices across the spectrum. This isn't a bug, it is a feature. All i ask is that when the primary is over EVERYONE get behind the nominee.