Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWAPO Editorial Board: Barr torched his reputation. His testimony added more fuel to the fire.
The Post's View Opinion
William Barr torched his reputation. His testimony compounded the damage.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/william-barr-torched-his-reputation-his-testimony-compounded-the-damage/2019/05/01/f757f6ce-6c34-11e9-a66d-a82d3f3d96d5_story.html?utm_term=.738bd174dd38
ATTORNEY GENERAL William P. Barr entered office with more credibility than many Trump appointees. A veteran of the George H.W. Bush administration, Mr. Barr avowed loyalty to the Justice Departments mission and, nearing the end of his career, seemed to have little incentive to serve as another Trump sycophant. Yet Mr. Barr has lit his reputation on fire, and he just added more fuel in his Wednesday testimony before a Senate panel.
Much of the hearing centered on the attorney generals decision to release a highly misleading representation of the findings of special counsel Robert S. Mueller IIIs Russia investigation. In particular, Mr. Barr failed to acknowledge the alarming nature of Mr. Muellers analysis on whether President Trump obstructed justice, and he did not explain why the special counsel declined to say whether Mr. Trump was guilty of the charge. This really matters: Given the damning account in Mr. Muellers report, what appeared to be keeping the special counsel from accusing the president of criminal acts was not the lack of evidence but the fact that the president cannot be charged under Justice Department rules.
Mr. Barr defended himself Wednesday by insisting that his memo, publicized weeks before he released any additional material, was technically accurate, despite the fact that his spin deeply affected the reception of Mr. Muellers full report when the public finally got it. It was not supposed to be a full summary of the special counsels report, he insisted just a brief explanation of the top-line conclusions. Mr. Barrs long history in Washington belies his argument: He should have known how his pre-spinning of the Mueller report would distort the truth of the special counsels damning findings, to the presidents benefit. He did it anyway.
Worth a full read at the link above...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 918 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WAPO Editorial Board: Barr torched his reputation. His testimony added more fuel to the fire. (Original Post)
hlthe2b
May 2019
OP
I excerpted most of it in my post. WAPO, Like NYT gives a few free articles each month and since
hlthe2b
May 2019
#4
Good!! I hope bob Mueller now sees his so called friend barr for who and what he really is
Thekaspervote
May 2019
#5
highplainsdem
(49,041 posts)1. K&R
Caliman73
(11,744 posts)2. My questions: What reputation did he have left to torch? AND Why?
It is ridiculous. We see Oliver North embroiled in scandal at the NRA, Weinberger went on to be a hack publisher at Forbes. Elliott Abrams is heading the Trump clusterfuck in Venezuela, and Barr who covered for all of those scum.
Barr should have NO reputation other than he helped to cover up Ronald Reagan's and GHW Bush's treason during Iran-Contra.
regnaD kciN
(26,045 posts)3. Behind a paywall...
So that "full read at the link above" is only for those who $hell out to Bezo$. And you can no longer get around it by using an incognito window.
hlthe2b
(102,379 posts)4. I excerpted most of it in my post. WAPO, Like NYT gives a few free articles each month and since
this is the first day of the month, the system should have "rolled over" so that you should have a few opportunities...?
The news site has a paywall that limits the number of articles non-subscribers can read each month before being blocked
http://money.com/money/4671856/get-free-subscription-to-the-washington-post/
Thekaspervote
(32,796 posts)5. Good!! I hope bob Mueller now sees his so called friend barr for who and what he really is