Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHey ReTHUGs - Christine Blassey-Ford says hi
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/bringing-in-outside-counsel-to-question-ford-was-a-mistake/2018/09/27/2e736d28-c2ad-11e8-a1f0-a4051b6ad114_story.htmlWhen the prospect of a Senate hearing to consider Christine Blasey Fords charges against Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh were first raised, I wrote a column suggesting that the Senate use outside counsel with experience in sexual harassment and assault to question witnesses at the hearing. I argued it would make the proceeding more professional, more of a fact-finding hearing, and less of a political sideshow. Senate Republicans seemingly followed this path, bringing in Arizona sex-crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell to question Ford and Kavanaugh.
It was a disaster. Mitchell missed the point and focused most of her questions on petty efforts to assail Fords credibility the extent of Fords fear of flying, who paid for her polygraph test, how her statement became public and never asked Ford about the real issue: what happened to her as a 15-year-old, and what role Kavanaugh had in it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 698 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hey ReTHUGs - Christine Blassey-Ford says hi (Original Post)
malaise
May 2019
OP
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)1. Mitchell was incompetent, willfully because she realized
she was unwilling to do as the intensely corrupt Republican senators wished, she had a blinding migraine, or...just incompetent? Her performance was strange.
Anyone know if Dr. Ford, her engineer husban and their two teenage sons have been able to settle into a home for any period after multiple moves to secret locations because of ongoing death threats? Hopefully near the surf they all reportedly loved. She's not been able to return to teaching last I heard. Best wishes wherever they are.
brewens
(13,588 posts)2. Did they ever prove her identity was actually leaked? I thought the first inication was that
media showed up at her door, but no one admitted leaking her letter or being on the receiving end. There was one other way her identity could have been known just for that anonymous letter that was published. Kavanaugh would have known who it was.
malaise
(269,004 posts)3. Don't know