General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJon Cryer FTW: Dude, you of all people should be cool with people who come in second...
The Kentuky Derby decision was not a good one. It was a rough and tumble race on a wet and sloppy track, actually, a beautiful thing to watch. Only in these days of political correctness could such an overturn occur. The best horse did NOT win the Kentucky Derby - not even close!
Link to tweet
PatSeg
(47,600 posts)"The best..........did NOT win..........not even close!" Freudian slip?
brewens
(13,621 posts)correctness. So just throw out the rules and allow anything out there, no matter how dirty? Sounds like Trump.
GoCubsGo
(32,093 posts)It wouldn't surprise me if the owners of the horse who was disqualified are members of one of his clubs, and that's why he's bitching. Or, perhaps one of his near-do-well demonspawn lost money on a bet because of it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)He saying? Using a horse race for political purposes.
DemoTex
(25,403 posts)Know what I mean, Vern?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,765 posts)I would have thought Ernest was a Trump supporter.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)BigOleDummy
(2,272 posts)
the Derby is a HUGE deal around here. Parades, Steamboat races, etc. for 2 weeks leading up to the Derby. While I'm not a horse racing aficionado its hard to escape the race here. I did watch a replay of the race online from a different angle (not the televised version), which by now is I'm sure easily available if you so desired, and I thought to myself "Hey, he can't do that". Even I , who knows nothing about the rules of horse racing, could see the blatant switching of lanes that occurred. Not only was it extremely dangerous, ESPECIALLY on a sloppy track like it was but illegal and unethical. If it was ME deciding this issue I would have banned not only the Jockey but the owner and trainer from participating in other Churchill Downs events for the foreseeable future.
The outcry from so many just makes me think that we as a Nation do not care one bit if someone cheats to "win". That's what it was too, cheating. Dangerous cheating at that. I say from "so many" because I took a online poll earlier this morning about it and it was 33/66% who thought that disqualification was warranted. It does not in the least surprise me that our cheater in chief found it to be unpalatable.
catbyte
(34,453 posts)thesquanderer
(11,992 posts)yonder
(9,676 posts)I'd say let the people who are, make that call and respect the decision. When I first saw it I was surprised one or more horses didn't go down. It's why we have rules in these things.
stopwastingmymoney
(2,042 posts)Im Canadian & even I know how to spell Kentucky
FakeNoose
(32,766 posts)yonder
(9,676 posts)doompatrol39
(428 posts)...the mythical "good Republican" who is so rare as to never be seen. I'm not sure if it was just Trump who put him over the edge, but he was definitely a Republican last I had checked. One of those "I'm so persecuted because I am a conservative in Hollywood" types.
But good on him for coming around I guess.
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)Last edited Sun May 5, 2019, 12:44 PM - Edit history (1)
"About that medal of honor I was planning to give you -- I'm giving it to the Kentucky Derby jockey who was cheated instead!"
rocktivity
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Last edited Sun May 5, 2019, 01:15 PM - Edit history (1)
But the internet is forever.
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)Is there NOTHING this asshole will not shoot his stupid mouth off about ?
Yaknow, Spanky, the wise man remains quiet while the fool opens his mouth and removes all doubt.
groundloop
(11,523 posts)Just ask him.
What a fucking pathetic embarrassment.
spanone
(135,877 posts)ReformedGOPer
(478 posts)rocktivity
(44,577 posts)Last edited Mon May 6, 2019, 12:46 AM - Edit history (4)
but your own.
Whether accidentally, incidentally, or on purpose, a rule appeared to have been broken. It was noticed and reported, and based on the evidence, the authorities agreed and administered the designated penalty. I can't imagine why President Duh Donald would have a problem with that...
rocktivity
lame54
(35,324 posts)patphil
(6,210 posts)I saw the film.
The rules are plain and were correctly followed.
The lead horse interfered with 3 horses. It's not allowed.
Too bad these stewards don't review elections.
Patrick Phillips
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)can too. I switch rules for lie and I use that all the time.