Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
Wed May 22, 2019, 03:58 PM May 2019

Judge Ramos in Deutsche bank/Trump doc case will NOT be issuing injunction against subpoena.

ON EDIT: The reporter's story from Courthouse News.

https://www.courthousenews.com/subpoenas-targeting-trump-bank-records-get-lift-off/

In his written briefings, Letter emphasized that the committees were conducting various investigations on issues of national significance. Among their “wide-ranging investigations,” the Committee on Financial Services listed probes into loan fraud, Bank Secrecy Act compliance and money laundering. The House Intelligence Committee cited its investigations into “Russia and other foreign entities to influence the U.S. political process during and since the 2016 election.”

The order by Ramos this afternoon refusing Trump an injunction is the latest in a succession of blows to the president’s longtime effort to keep his finances secret.

On Monday, another federal judge gave Trump’s accountants at Mazars USA LLP seven days to cough up his financial records. Today’s hearing meanwhile began mere hours after the New York Assembly authorized the release of Trump’s state tax returns to the U.S. House of Representatives.

Immersed in a “wide-ranging investigation,” the Committee on Financial Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence are seeking records from Deutsche Bank and Capitol One on Trump, his family and seven entities associated with them.






Adam Klasfeld
?
Verified account

@KlasfeldReports


BREAKING: Ramos WON'T preliminarily enjoin the subpoenas.
12:47 PM - 22 May 2019


More tweets in same thread:

Ramos: The Committees have provided sound evidence as to why the RFPA (Right to Financial Privacy Act) does not apply to Congress.

Context for those unfamiliar with judicial rulings:

Ramos is describing the various grounds for challenge. The argument that Trump, his family and his business entities would face irreparable harm persuaded him, the notion that it violated the RFPA did not. Devil in the details.

Ramos: Plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on their constitutional claims.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Ramos in Deutsche bank/Trump doc case will NOT be issuing injunction against subpoena. (Original Post) pnwmom May 2019 OP
Hahahahahaahahahhah! gldstwmn May 2019 #1
"NO INJUNCTION FOR YOU!!!" Leghorn21 May 2019 #2
From my twitter feed Gothmog May 2019 #3
This has been a pretty bad week for DT so far, don't you think? pnwmom May 2019 #4

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
4. This has been a pretty bad week for DT so far, don't you think?
Wed May 22, 2019, 04:25 PM
May 2019

The Mazars ruling, the Deutsche bank ruling, and the two new NY state laws.

Pretty good for two days.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Ramos in Deutsche b...