General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI M P E A C H M E N T
So Mueller remains enigmatic. He will not be joining any House committees willingly.
Meanwhile, Trump, like it or not, is in a pretty strong position to ride things out and even win in 2020. He has a DOJ that has not lifted a single finger to stop the Russians from fucking with our elections again. He has an Attorney General who works against the people and for him. He has a packed Supreme Court. He has a strangle hold on the Senate. He has the power to bring down any GOPeer who stands against him.
With that, the poll asks: do we impeach?
BONUS:
If you care to expand and expound, what is accomplished by an impeachment that goes down along party lines in the Senate? That's not to say no to impeachment. It is to ask the question and seek your views.
24 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes, Impeach Now | |
23 (96%) |
|
Yes, but only if we get substantial bipartisanism | |
0 (0%) |
|
No | |
0 (0%) |
|
No, unless we get substantial bipartisanism | |
1 (4%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
hlthe2b
(102,419 posts)If you asked if hearings should continue that MIGHT lead to an impeachment VOTE, the answers WOULD be starkly different.
If you actually called these hearings "impeachment inquiries" but prefaced that they may or may NOT lead to a vote to impeach, the answers would be starkly different.
If you actually called these hearings "impeachment hearings" but again prefaced that they may or may NOT lead to a vote to impeach, the answers would likely be less dramatic but still different.
Impeachment is a process and we, our less biased media allies, and Congress itself have done a piss poor job both discussing it as such and differentiating where we are at now.
Stinky The Clown
(67,832 posts)Impeachment IS a political process.
Twitterboy and his posse will win the image and optics war and that's kind of where we are.
hlthe2b
(102,419 posts)Is it opening inquiries specified as impeachment inquiries? Is it opening up public hearings, specified as impeachment hearings? Is it investigating in a myriad of uncoordinated congressional hearings in the name of accountability assuming their findings will somehow be "married in the end?"
MSM needs to specify. Pundits need to specify. Pollsters need to specify. Congressional leaders need to specify on tv interviews. and yes, YOU need to specify.
Stinky The Clown
(67,832 posts)That means, should we enter the process formally. A mitigator for some is the Senate.
hlthe2b
(102,419 posts)Maybe that annoys you, but it is the truth. Much of our problem in getting our message out is because we are allowing that confusion/misperception to persist.
Your poll didn't say "begin the impeachment PROCESS" , it said (only) "IMPEACHMENT"
Stinky The Clown
(67,832 posts)Pendanticism is fun for some.
No worry.
Have a swell day.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)just worded differently? I can't tell if that was intentional, but I think it might be.
eleny
(46,166 posts)Grasswire2
(13,571 posts)1. Bipartisanship will NEVER HAPPEN.
2. Opening the inquiry provides Dems with prosecutorial powers to obtain more info.
3. Opening an inquiry focuses the national conversation on the crimes and allows Dems to "teach" America what happened....just as Watergate hearings taught Americans.
Impeachment and Removal are two different goals. Dems don't have to make ANY move toward removal prior to the election.
But the key to success lies in "telling the story" as Brian Williams says the reported needed a "writer" to put it together as a story, not just as a document.
BewilderedCitizen
(53 posts)How can we say we are any better if we won't at least begin an Impeachment Inquiry because we think it will hurt us in the 2020 elections?
You can say it's just smart politics, but I'm guessing that's how the Republicans justify not doing anything to themselves.
I know it's not the same, but it still doesn't seem right to me.
One thing I do know, is that if this were a Democratic President, the Republicans would have started the Impeachment process long ago.
Turin_C3PO
(14,087 posts)their Republican Senators to convict. Otherwise Trump will go around saying he was exonerated. My opinion changes daily though lol.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Begin a formal investigation into impeachment?
Stinky The Clown
(67,832 posts)The question was about impeachment. To get there, you start the process. That's what the question is.
myohmy2
(3,182 posts)...is that we demonstrate to America that we stand with and for democracy, the rule of law, the Constitution and the American people...we make our case, stand with the law and Constitution then let the voters decide in 2020...
...if we win, the country as we've known it will have been saved...if we lose, then the country will have fundamentally changed and we no longer live in the America we all knew...
...either way, we'll know where we stand...to minimize impeachment or do nothing would down-play the serious crisis we're in...
...I would even say, not to impeach would make us co-conspirators and accomplices...
...besides, impeaching trump would make me happy...
bdamomma
(63,931 posts)this lying POS is not going to get over us. People around the world are watching.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)The orange assclown has committed impeachable offenses. Democrats must do the right thing and hold him accountable, even if Republicans will not.
Skittles
(153,226 posts)fuck this shyte
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)Feels good to do it, especially to the Rs.