Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 09:00 AM Aug 2012

Team Romney White-Vote Push: ‘This Is the Last Time Anyone Will Try to Do This’

Team Romney White-Vote Push: ‘This Is the Last Time Anyone Will Try to Do This’
Jonathan Chait
New York Magazine

A Republican strategist said something interesting and revealing on Friday, though it largely escaped attention in the howling gusts of punditry over Mitt Romney’s birth certificate crack and a potential convention-altering hurricane. The subject was a Ron Brownstein story outlining the demographic hit rates each party requires to win in November. To squeak out a majority, Mitt Romney probably needs to win at least 61 percent of the white vote — a figure exceeding what George H.W. Bush commanded over Michael Dukakis in 1988. The Republican strategist told Brownstein, “This is the last time anyone will try to do this” — “this” being a near total reliance on white votes to win a presidential election.

(snip)

The “2012 or never” hypothesis helps explain why a series of Republican candidates, first in the House and most recently at the presidential candidate level, have taken the politically risky step of openly declaring themselves for Paul Ryan’s radical blueprint. Romney’s campaign has been floating word of late that it sees a potential presidency as following the mold of James K. Polk — fulfilling dramatic policy change, and leaving after a single term. “Multiple senior Romney advisers assured me that they had had conversations with the candidate in which he conveyed a depth of conviction about the need to try to enact something like Ryan’s controversial budget and entitlement reforms,” reports the Huffington Post’s Jonathan Ward. “Romney, they said, was willing to count the cost politically in order to achieve it.” David Leonhardt floats a similar sketch, plausibly outlining how Romney could transform the shape of American government by using a Senate procedure that circumvents the filibuster to quickly lock in large regressive tax cuts and repeal of health insurance subsidies to tens of millions of Americans.

(snip)

He will cut subsidies to the non-elderly people who would get insurance through Obamacare — a program that, Romney’s ads remind older voters, is “NOT FOR YOU.” Romney’s repeated ads on welfare, blaring the brazen lie that Obama has repealed the welfare work requirement, hammer home the same theme. The purpose is to portray Obama as diverting resources from us to them.

In their heart of hearts, Romney and Ryan would probably prefer a more sweeping, across-the-board assault on the welfare state. But the immense popularity of the largest, middle-class social insurance programs like Medicare and Social Security force them into the divide-and-conquer gambit. They can promise to hold their disproportionately old, white base harmless and impose the entire brunt of their ambitious downsizing of government on young, poor, and disproportionately nonwhite Democratic constituencies.

The rest: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/08/2012-or-never-for-gops-white-base.html
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

unblock

(52,376 posts)
2. some in my extended family are advocating the "let them break it" gambit:
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 09:08 AM
Aug 2012

they argue that perhaps the wisest long-term strategy would be to let the republicans win everything, let them destroy the safety net, and then the democratic party can come back with a vengeance with a rage and fury not seen since the 30's.

i don't care for that approach, arguing that we tried that with shrub, and although we did manage to get a black president out of it, we're hardly better off in the scheme of things vs. where we might have been with 8 years of gore in charge.

but interestingly enough, this article implies that rmoney is signing on for that exact approach -- getting the legislative changes he wants knowing it will be politically unpopular. though perhaps he's only thinking he alone will pay the price, as opposed to the entire republican party.


an intersting question for those late-night sophomore bull sessions. personally, i prefer winning at every opportunity.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
6. Yes -- so nominating a Massachuesettes / Utah / San Diego Mormon, "liberal"
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 09:44 AM
Aug 2012

out of touch, JFK-wannabe with a rude attitude is totally wrong for them.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
12. The GOP "Southern Strategy" isn't atually about the south.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 02:35 PM
Aug 2012

That's simply the name that the GOP gave their strategy to try to blame the woes of poor and middle class whites on minorities.

Its roots derive from the migration of the southern Dixie-Crats, who left the Democratic party after the civil rights movement. And as such, it has helped the GOP maintain majorities in much of the south to this day.

But the Southern Strategy's usefulness easily transfers to states like PA, where much of the state is rural, middle class, suffering, and white. See, the jobs didn't go away because the "job creators" shipped them over seas ... minorities did it.

It more or less started with Nixon (although some might say Goldwater), and Nixon was from California. Reagan continued this approach, he was born in Illinois. Bush the senior also used this strategy, he was born in Massachusetts. Bush II also used it, he was born in Connecticut. So clearly you don't need to be from the south to use the GOP's "Southern Strategy".

This is where the term "Welfare Queen" originates. Its why Newt uses the phrase "food-stamp President". And its why Mitt's campaign is falsely claiming that Obama removed the work requirement from welfare. Its why the GOP claims that Fanny and Freddie caused the financial collapse.

And Mitt is nothing like JFK. But he is very much like Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush 2.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. Depends on how successful it is this time.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 09:37 AM
Aug 2012

If they are able to keep the House with the White Power strategy, expect a return in 2016.

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
7. 'Last time'?! What else have they got but white voters?
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 10:28 AM
Aug 2012

Are they going to convince Hispanic citizens to deport themselves, and convince poor and middle class minorities to sacrifice financially to help millionaires?

Unless Republicans throw out TP extremists and come back where they were before Reagan, IMO they are doomed to rely on white racism to win office. This strategy might work in gerrymandered House districts that shut out segregated minority communities, but it's not going to work in statewide and Presidential elections. Given demographic trends, 2012 is the last time a strategy of lying, white racist ads might have an excellent chance to WORK, but IMO it's certainly not the last time desperate Republicans are going to TRY it.

Johonny

(20,907 posts)
8. Since it will clearly win at the local/state level I don't see why it will be the last time
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 11:10 AM
Aug 2012

Clearly in certain regions of the country it is highly effective. That it fails nationally is not really a concern for someone running for governor or the senate. Since it is highly effective locally it will work also in the primaries which are just a series of fractional elections. Thus even on the national stage the party won't be able to escape it. The only way would be to bring minorities into the party. To bring minorities into the party however generally means you have to like them. Which is a problem if disliking them is your political election strategy...

pampango

(24,692 posts)
11. Indeed. When demographics are going against you and you think you are fighting "to get your country
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 11:27 AM
Aug 2012

back", desperation (including using racist and misogynistic rhetoric) probably seems worthwhile.

Rather than adapt to reality and the future, they use disgusting tactics to try to bring back the past.

BumRushDaShow

(129,653 posts)
10. "'This Is the Last Time Anyone Will Try to Do This'"
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 11:18 AM
Aug 2012

Until the next time. It is never-ending.

Voter suppression. Voter purges. Voter apathy. Racism.

These are the same people (or decendants of those people) who were willing to pay double to construct "Whites Only" water fountains or schools and "Colored Only" train cars or hotels, etc. It's a sickness.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Team Romney White-Vote Pu...