Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS to label nuclear waste as less dangerous to quicken cleanup
US to label nuclear waste as less dangerous to quicken cleanup
Energy department says labeling some waste as low-level at sites in Washington state, Idaho and South Carolina will save $40bn
Associated Press
Wed 5 Jun 2019 17.33 EDT
The US government plans to reclassify some of the nations most dangerous radioactive waste to lower its threat level, outraging critics who say the move would make it cheaper and easier to walk away from cleaning up nuclear weapons production sites in Washington state, Idaho and South Carolina.
The Department of Energy said on Wednesday that labeling some high-level waste as low level will save $40bn in cleanup costs across the nations entire nuclear weapons complex. The material that has languished for decades in the three states would be taken to low-level disposal facilities in Utah or Texas, the agency said.
This administration is proposing a responsible, results-driven solution that will finally open potential avenues for the safe treatment and removal of the lower level waste, said Paul Dabber, the energy undersecretary. This will accelerate cleanup and reduce risk.
The agency will maintain standards set by the independent Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with the goal of getting the lower-level waste out of these states without sacrificing public safety, Dabber said.
Critics said its a way for federal officials to walk away from their obligation to properly clean up a massive quantity of radioactive waste left from nuclear weapons production dating to the second world war and the cold war.
The waste is housed at the Savannah River Plant in South Carolina, the Idaho National Laboratory and Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state the most contaminated nuclear site in the country.
more...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/05/us-to-label-nuclear-waste-as-less-dangerous-to-quicken-cleanup?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=fb_us&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2PJIiapyWPoT3R2GKL8IKsuHYzTD_kleSJTIUOjCfEcp1BJK6OPTr4Pjw#Echobox=1559772759
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 585 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US to label nuclear waste as less dangerous to quicken cleanup (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2019
OP
pangaia
(24,324 posts)1. Saying something is true makes it so.
That is how an authoritarian dictatorship works.
Turbineguy
(37,365 posts)2. This Paul Dabbar guy is supposed to be smart.
Of course, with trump, you could walk in knowing something and walk out not knowing it anymore.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)3. I'm starting to think all these cabinet level departments need a serious
re-evaluation of how they're assembled and who they're accountable to.
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)4. Just mix it in with top soil and sell it to Home Depot & Lowes.
Solly Mack
(90,785 posts)5. Dump it at Trump Tower.