General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Con man, crook, draft dodger, racist'--actual words House Republicans want to ban in Trump hearing
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/6/7/1863356/--Con-man-crook-draft-dodger-racist-actual-words-House-Republicans-want-to-ban-in-Trump-hearingIts quite an incredible list, really. Rep. Collins has quite accurately nailed Trumps character with these descriptors.
Cowardly
Infantile
Bilking the taxpayer
Delusional
Hypocritical
Liar
Amoral
Lining the pockets of his cronies
Draft-dodger
Crook
Conman
Engaged in illegal activity
Crook
Racist
Bigot
Misogynist
Un-American
Giving aid and comfort to the enemy
Spying
Abusing power
Abusing Executive Privilege
Demagogue
Disrespected the office
Can you believe these sensitive snowflakes? Collins may have House precedent and rules of decorum on his side, but as Politico reporter Kyle Cheney noted, these rules of decorum do not apply to impeachment hearings. If Democrats want to get specific and call out the alleged crimes and offenses committed by Donald Trump, they will have to open impeachment hearings on the cowardly, infantile, bilking-the-taxpayer, delusional, hypocritical, liar, amoral, lining-the-pockets-of-his-cronies, draft-dodging, crook, conman, racist, bigot, misogynistic, un-American, spying, power-abusing demagogue who disrespects the office of the presidency every day he is in it.
CurtEastPoint
(18,656 posts)What a supreme DOUCHENOZZLE.
I should have KNOWS this... he was a SENIOR PASTOR at a Baptist 'CHurch' for 11 GD years.
Zorro
(15,749 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,193 posts)EveHammond13
(2,855 posts)SunSeeker
(51,664 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,591 posts)Actually, the committee should vote on each term separately to decide whether it should be prohibited. That would be an interesting hearing. Each Democrat would make a statement about why a specific term, eg., "con man," should be allowed, and then a Republican would have to argue why the term should not be used. Then the committee votes on the term (Democrats win) and moves on to the next term. This would put the Republicans in the position of explaining just why a specific term should not be used in describing Trump, as well as highlighting Fat Donnie's character defects.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Response to Zorro (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
spanone
(135,863 posts)LuckyCharms
(17,455 posts)Mopar151
(9,992 posts)Leghorn21
(13,526 posts)SEXUAL PREDATOR
FUCKFACE
DUMBASS
LOSER
WHINER
LIAR
SCUMBUCKET
SADO-MASOCHIST
etcetcetc
gopiscrap
(23,763 posts)kedrys
(7,678 posts)onetexan
(13,057 posts)deurbano
(2,895 posts)Dotard
Imperial Wizard
TeamPooka
(24,250 posts)lame54
(35,317 posts)Hassler
(3,389 posts)dalton99a
(81,569 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,760 posts)the election "irregularities" was relegated to the basement of the House, funding was cut and to my knowledge no actual investigation of voting machine (Diebold, etc.) hacking, "hanging chad" interpretation, re-count disruptors bussed from DC to FL (Bolton, Stone, et al) or or anything meaningful was conducted. The committee got nowhere and was terminated. If history is any indicator, we are in deep @#$, due to total GOP complicity and obstruction of democracy. Kushner just actively articulated seeking continuation of Russian help in the next election in the recent Axios interview.
Time to fight.
walkingman
(7,655 posts)Mister Ed
(5,943 posts)...and he should read the list out loud and into the record so that it's clearly understood.
Between the lines, a great deal would be understood.
With luck, the networks might play Nadler's reading of the list on heavy rotation.
TruckFump
(5,812 posts)I hope he does that and adds a few as suggested on this thread!
sprinkleeninow
(20,254 posts)Let 'em rip!!
Leghorn21
(13,526 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)I doubt cable or network news could resist playing that as a sound bite.
NBachers
(17,135 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)"All right, first one coward. You may not refer to Donald Trump's inherent cowardice, nor call him a coward. Also liar - even if Donald Trump lies outright, you are not to acknowledge any of his lies, no matter how numerous, so as not to brush our president's feelings the wrong way. Let's move onto engaged in illegal activity; the Republicans would appreciate we don't refer to any of Donald J. Trump's extensive list of illegal activities as "illegal". This includes calling him an amoral crook and conman. Again, do not point out Trump is a crook or a conman who is engaged in illegal activity under any circumstances. Also, don't call him a racist - referring to Donald Trump's extremely obvious racism - put that right out of your minds."
"Do I need to put these up on a screen somewhere? It needs to stay up for the whole proceeding so we can refer to it and not accidentally say one of the things the Republicans would like us not to mention. Someone bring me a whiteboard, please? No, a bigger one. Actually, bring two, you know the kind with two sides we can flip over from time to time."
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)Asshole,
Shit Gabon,
Fraud,
Pervert, and
Douchebag?
Can they use those words?
TruckFump
(5,812 posts)..."grab 'em by the p*ssy?"
I would think that would be the top of the list!
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)If we can't agree to hold a hearing with the normal procedure, because we cave to extreme demands, then we certainly will have trouble when the going gets tough.
If it's in the Mueller Report, it's okay to say it. Mueller may quote some people that use those words. I don't think most reps will call Trump names. That's what Trump does. But if they ask questions about whether a statement means that Trump was "abusing power" or that he "disrespected the office," that's fair and within bounds. "Abusing power" IS part of the crime of obstructing justice.
Hekate
(90,779 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,594 posts)That includes all his oh-so-clever insults.
sprinkleeninow
(20,254 posts)pandr32
(11,605 posts)If it is in a tweet from the official usurper--it should fly!
Come to think of it 'usurper' wasn't on the banned list.
keithbvadu2
(36,887 posts)Disallow only those words not usable in the Benghazi hearings about Hillary and Obama.
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 8, 2019, 05:09 AM - Edit history (1)
the hearing. Collins did a great job of compiling a list of applicable Trump descriptors.
It would be absolutely hilarious! I don't know if I could do it with a straight face. I'm sure Colbert and the rest of the late night comedians will have a field day with this request.
in2herbs
(2,947 posts)tblue37
(65,483 posts)pandr32
(11,605 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,494 posts)........
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)It's impossible.
Response to smirkymonkey (Reply #26)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Raven123
(4,862 posts)This is rich coming from the party that had a member call Obama a liar during a Presidential address to Congress.
pandr32
(11,605 posts)As such--not on the list! Neither is:
racketeer
charlatan
cheat
con artist
traitor
fraud(ster)
psycho
phony
self-dealer
grifter
bully
braggart
low-life
etc. We could go on and on.
onetexan
(13,057 posts)Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)They are just a bunch of followers who cannot think for themselves and are just cowards. Just look at the aka enabling hearing and his conduct. The biggest myth, outright is that the left is soft and the right is hard and tough. Its just total bullshit.
MuseRider
(34,115 posts)by reading this aloud into the record. It needs to be heard and kept for all time and used with the definition of Republican Snowflake Mentality or something like that so that forevermore it can be pulled out to show how cowardly and belligerent and undemocratic these dumb asses are.
Read it in, have a few chuckles and maybe even take a little vote then put it aside with a head shake and a sigh and announce the meeting will begin about the Liar In Chief Donald Trump etc. etc. etc. using as many of those names as possible....or not. The head shake and sigh should be enough.
**Why are these people not too embarrassed to act like this? Honestly, I would never ever in a million years say anything like that out loud let alone write it where it can be read over and over again forever. They should be embarrassed and ashamed. Do they not even know what our government stands for? Embarrassing.
Mme. Defarge
(8,040 posts)demented, unstable, depraved, deluded, uncouth, repulsive, fool.
paleotn
(17,946 posts)fuck you. Elections have consequences. You've said that yourselves, you lying, bigoted, un-American shit stains!
TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)I mean, they didn't seem to object to any of those words when they were forcing Peter Strzok to read is text messages.
Let's get H.R. 'Puff-n-Stuff' McMaster, and Tyrantosaurus Rex Tillerson on the stand, and get them to repeat the times they called Trump a 'fucking moron.'
joe_stampingbull
(165 posts)fascist
bone spurs
John McCain
KayF
(1,345 posts)great point
UTUSN
(70,725 posts)yonder
(9,671 posts)I'd say we need his/her? unique style of descriptive English right about now.
Calling The Ferret/Shower Cap. Calling The Ferret/Shower Cap.
Golden Raisin
(4,612 posts)durablend
(7,464 posts)Maybe our side should chant "LOCK HIM UP!" during the proceedings.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)their warped interpretation of the 2nd amendment?
(Rhetorical question)
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Mme. Defarge
(8,040 posts)blogslut
(38,010 posts)More than can fit in your little head.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,494 posts)all Rethugs that said anything nasty, demeaning or derogatory about President Obama during his entire eight years would go on record that they retract and apologize for those statements.
How's that for a deal?
Sounds to me like Collins knows Trump like a book......
onetexan
(13,057 posts)Dems are just giving the crooked GOP a taste of their own medicine
Freethinker65
(10,037 posts)Useful idiot...
onetexan
(13,057 posts)superpatriotman
(6,252 posts)Theres plenty of words - the best words - that we can use to battle the evil horde.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,358 posts)or had "not been honest". https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=la5pbBC7mmQC&pg=PA188
"Any suggestion of mendacity is out of order". This seems to make any discussion of Trump impossible.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Id give him a couple st most, maybe bigot in this context.
70sEraVet
(3,508 posts)There's an OLD joke about the days of the Czar in Russia. After a particularly harsh set of laws were imposed, three poor tailors in a tiny Ukrainian town were complaining to each other at a local inn about the Czar. One says "He's a thief and a swindler!" Another says "He's an idiot, a nitwit!" The third says "He guzzles vodka lie a swine!" The local gendarme appears and promptly arrests them and brings them before the commissioner of police. The commissioner shrieks "How dare you insult out beloved Czar!" But the three frightened tailors told him that they were not talking about the Czar - they were complaining about the Inkeeper. Then the commissioner says, "How was the gendarme to know? When he heard 'idiot', 'thief' and 'swine', naturally he thought you were talking about the Czar".
Liberal In Texas
(13,574 posts)Amusing post.
gopiscrap
(23,763 posts)Hekate
(90,779 posts)Doreen
(11,686 posts)Every word I saw I thought of another that meant the same or pretty damn close to the same. A thesaurus would be a great tool. Basically they do not want any words that are truthful.
Liberal In Texas
(13,574 posts)Traitor
Grifter
Incompetent
Obese
Russian Asset
Russian Tool
Horn-dog
Impotent
Thief
Dead-beat
Puppet
Cheater
Bilker
Swindler
Rip-Off Artist
Mountebank
Hustler
Fleecer
Fraud
Swindler
There are more, just ran out of interest.
pecosbob
(7,542 posts)in his ridiculous hearings.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)That term embraces all the other evil, immoral and criminal shit.
* aka republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief
Owens
(202 posts)Democrats should give their own list to Collins. Namely, they can't call Hillary any names.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)What a clown!
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Sanity prevails folks. lol
czarjak
(11,289 posts)madaboutharry
(40,219 posts)Doug Collins is right up there with the most smarmy creatures in the Republican party. Chairman Nadler should tell him to shove it.
jcgoldie
(11,639 posts)Without these descriptors how will anyone know they are talking about Trump?!?
Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)rampartc
(5,434 posts)and then repeat the list with an "in accordance with our distinguished colleagues' wishes please refrain from calling the president
."
then, each representative could begin their turn with a point of order : "mr chairman, am I to understand that I am not allowed to call the president" , read the list, then perhaps I will substitute "snowflake" in my prepared remarks?"
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,034 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,034 posts)No woman elected or running in the US democratic system has dodged the draft.
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Or Putin's sycophant...
People might get ideas.
Leghorn21
(13,526 posts)muntrv
(14,505 posts)muntrv
(14,505 posts)Firestorm49
(4,037 posts)Begin the hearings by publicly announcing all of the words and phrases that Collins doesnt want used.
avebury
(10,952 posts)1. Blow up the letter, add numbers by the offensive words, put it on poster board on an easel in the hearing room.
2. Enter the document as updated into the hearing record.
3. In light of Rep. Collins delicate nature, If a Committee member needs to cite one of the words, please cite it by the related number.
This would bring way more attention to the words than if Collins had just kept his mouth shut.
Another Democrat could request to enter into the record those words not included in the list which make them fair game.
It is all about playing the game better than the Rethugs.
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)Don't use any words against President Duh Donald that he hasn't used against others...
rocktivity
Hotler
(11,443 posts)smb
(3,474 posts)...that have Old Orangestain's picture next to them in the dictionary.
SWBTATTReg
(22,156 posts)After all, if they can call liberals and all kinds of derivatives of this word, we can call them what we want too. After all, the so called president called one the wife of Britain's ruling family 'nasty'...until the POS apologizes for each and every single slur he's uttered, call him every name in the book! He's earned it.
Nitram
(22,861 posts)the same terms when Trump was running in the primaries.
3catwoman3
(24,032 posts)...so many of the traits that describe Cadet Bonespurs so perfectly. He must feel that such a list is necessary.
There would have been no such list about President Obama.
BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)Id say they should keep describing him accurately. Theyll do our jobs for us.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)NBachers
(17,135 posts)Shoonra
(523 posts)Someone should print up BINGO cards with one of these expressions in every square and we watch C-Span of the House of Representatives and compete to see which sequence fills out a line first.
Every day's session a new game.
Someone else could keep track of the sequence in which these expression are first said in the House each day.for those of us who cannot watch TV in the daytime.
usaf-vet
(6,203 posts)A no booze county. BUT there was a workaround. When you went to a bar they only sold the mixes i.e coke, ginger ale, water, club soda, etc. You could brown back your booze and check it in with the house. They would issue you a number.
So your bottle of rum might be 23. Your vodka 19. You get the idea.
So you would order 23 & coke or 19 & club soda. You get the idea.
Considering most questions in these hearings are read from prepared statements.
So here is the brown bag version of Collin's list
#0 Trump, president etc.
#1 Cowardly
#2 Infantile
#3 Bilking the taxpayer
#4 Delusional
#5 Hypocritical
#6 Liar
#7 Amoral
#8 Lining the pockets of his cronies
#9 Draft-dodger
#10 Crook
#11 Conman
#12 Engaged in illegal activity
#13 Crook
#14 Racist
#15 Bigot
#16 Misogynist
#17 Un-American
#18 Giving aid and comfort to the enemy
#19 Spying
#20 Abusing power
#21 Abusing Executive Privilege
#22 Demagogue
#23 Disrespected the office
Each prepared statement is broadcast to provide a key.
So.. Isn't it true that your boss #0 is a #6 and a #14, and a #20 and of course totally #21. Answer Yes or No!
Well, you get the point. I went home many a night mostly drunk on #19 and club soda. Never having said the word alcohol. I was never sure why I had a hangover.
MasonDreams
(756 posts)War is peace, Freedom is slavery, Ignorance is strength
Big Brother has decided to dissolve Congress.
Elections will be abolished and the money we save will be used in the war effort. If you have questions or concerns please wait 'til after the war, we're busy.
N_E_1 for Tennis
(9,774 posts)While remarking...So everyone understands...Cowardly will be replaced by...scaredy-cat, Infantile will be replaced by Baby-like, bilking the taxpayer replaced by scamming the taxpayer...and on and on
Sticks and stones may break my bones but these words can melt snowflakes.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Where do they come up with this crazy stuff?
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)For some of the Democrats used to the perpetual bending backwards strategy, combined with extreme PCism so as not to offend the frailest of the frail, I would not be surprised if they accepted this. Which won't make one iota of difference in the words the Republicans and Trump will be calling Democrats for even daring to start impeachment, let alone throughout the process. But hey, as long as WE go high...and we can go to sleep at night knowing we did our absolute best to not offend any demographic, and if Trump gets easier treatment and maybe even gets off because of it? Meh...its more important to know our party never crossed the line and stuck to the politeness rules (that they imposed).
Response to LiberalLovinLug (Reply #109)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)poster child for Moral Turpitude
Thug
Idiot
Dufus
Nuggets
(525 posts)No reason to oblige Republicans who falsely used the daily about Obama and the Clintons.
This isnt any reason to begin any impeachment inquiry now, but I sure am amused by all the reasons we need to side step our leadership and try and force them into doing something when its not prudent.
I stand with Pelosi, Schiff and the 6 committees working on justice.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)as usual.