Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,010 posts)
Tue Jun 11, 2019, 08:19 PM Jun 2019

Justice Dept. to Congress: Back off contempt, or Barr will ask Trump to shield census documents

Attorney General William P. Barr will ask President Trump to assert executive privilege to shield documents from the administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census if Democratic lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee proceed toward holding Barr in contempt, the Justice Department revealed in a letter Tuesday.

The revelation came on the eve of an expected Oversight Committee vote to hold Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt for failing to turn over documents that lawmakers had subpoenaed, as well as stopping a witness from testifying without a Justice Department lawyer. Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd wrote that the decision to schedule the vote was “premature” and accused lawmakers of refusing to negotiate with the department to get at least some of what they wanted.

“In the face of this threatened contempt vote, the Attorney General is now compelled to request that the President invoke executive privilege with respect to the materials subject to the subpoena to the Attorney General and the subpoena to the Secretary of the Department of Commerce,” Boyd wrote. “I hereby request that the Committee hold the subpoenas in abeyance and delay any vote on whether to recommend a citation of contempt for noncompliance with the subpoenas, pending the President’s determination of this question.”

Boyd added that if the committee rejected the request, the department would “be forced to reevaluate its current production efforts in ongoing matters.” He requested that the committee respond by 5 p.m. Tuesday and noted that the president had not yet asserted executive privilege to protect the documents from disclosure.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/justice-dept-to-congress-back-off-contempt-or-barr-will-ask-trump-to-shield-census-materials/ar-AACJA6b?li=BBnb7Kz

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Dept. to Congress: Back off contempt, or Barr will ask Trump to shield census documents (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2019 OP
You gotta be fucking kidding me ... what a WEASEL ... mr_lebowski Jun 2019 #1
Lock them malaise Jun 2019 #2
The Constitution requires it Red Mountain Jun 2019 #3
This is how the Republicans work. trev Jun 2019 #4
Bill Barr is going to be paying some hefty civil fines DeminPennswoods Jun 2019 #5
Would this question then become moot for the census? RainCaster Jun 2019 #6
Contemptuous. C_U_L8R Jun 2019 #7
sounds larwdem Jun 2019 #8
"Nice county you got there - shame Retrograde Jun 2019 #9
So what? Ligyron Jun 2019 #10
"Watch it! Or he will slap tariffs on the Cannon House Office Building!" struggle4progress Jun 2019 #11
How the hell is that defensible? pecosbob Jun 2019 #12
Be careful or I'll throw a major tantrum and hide my toys from you! ProudLib72 Jun 2019 #13
 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
1. You gotta be fucking kidding me ... what a WEASEL ...
Tue Jun 11, 2019, 08:36 PM
Jun 2019

The Census questions have NOTHING TO DO with the freaking Justice Department.

Where does he even get off threatening this bullshit?

Unbelievable.

trev

(1,480 posts)
4. This is how the Republicans work.
Tue Jun 11, 2019, 08:57 PM
Jun 2019

The current "leaders" are corrupt to the hilt, they know it, and they are using every tactic a felon can use.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
5. Bill Barr is going to be paying some hefty civil fines
Tue Jun 11, 2019, 09:00 PM
Jun 2019

What's he got about 3 contempt citations on himself now? Sure hope he doesn't expect Trump to cover the bill!

Retrograde

(10,137 posts)
9. "Nice county you got there - shame
Tue Jun 11, 2019, 11:09 PM
Jun 2019

if anything were to happen to it"

Methinks the consigliare is as big a bully (at least) as his boss. BTW, doesn't Barr have a law license? Doesn't that require knowledge of the US Constitution?

Ligyron

(7,633 posts)
10. So what?
Tue Jun 11, 2019, 11:21 PM
Jun 2019

They weren't going to give those up anyway unless a court orders it. Plus, everyone knows what's in them.

pecosbob

(7,541 posts)
12. How the hell is that defensible?
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 12:30 AM
Jun 2019

Boyd added that if the committee rejected the request, the department would “be forced to reevaluate its current production efforts in ongoing matters.”

So if Congress fails to withdraw the civil contempt finding then Justice threatens to obstruct on other unrelated investigatory documentation requests?

The law is the law, not Let's Make a Deal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Dept. to Congress...