Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,009 posts)
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 09:28 PM Jun 2019

Seniors face foreclosure after being sold risk-free retirement with reverse mortgages

In a stealth aftershock of the Great Recession, nearly 100,000 loans that allowed senior citizens to tap into their home equity have failed, blindsiding elderly borrowers and their families and dragging down property values in their neighborhoods.

In many cases, the worst toll has fallen on those ill-equipped to shoulder it: urban African Americans, many of whom worked for most of their lives, then found themselves struggling in retirement.

Alarming reports from federal investigators five years ago led the Department of Housing and Urban Development to initiate a series of changes to protect seniors. USA TODAY’s review of government foreclosure data found a generation of families fell through the cracks and continue to suffer from reverse mortgage loans written a decade ago.

These elderly homeowners were wooed into borrowing money through the special program by attractive sales pitches or a dire need for cash – or both. When they missed a paperwork deadline or fell behind on taxes or insurance, lenders moved swiftly to foreclose on the home. Those foreclosures wiped out hard-earned generational wealth built in the decades since the Fair Housing Act of 1968.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/seniors-face-foreclosure-after-being-sold-risk-free-retirement-with-reverse-mortgages/ar-AACKhpC?li=BBnbfcL

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seniors face foreclosure after being sold risk-free retirement with reverse mortgages (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2019 OP
When Fred Thompson was doing ads for these he'd mention that they were part of a bill signed dflprincess Jun 2019 #1
This is a serious issue. Wellstone ruled Jun 2019 #2
I did not mean to make light of it dflprincess Jun 2019 #3
Just because one recieves a check monthly Wellstone ruled Jun 2019 #4
I don't understand how this can be legal dflprincess Jun 2019 #5
Liz Warren warned the Nation as to what Wellstone ruled Jun 2019 #16
That's a pretty dumb assumption if they were paying it all along. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2019 #17
Another Regan problem hurled on Americans liberal N proud Jun 2019 #7
That would be a red light to me. calimary Jun 2019 #13
Yes, I remember those ads.. mountain grammy Jun 2019 #14
Yep. A neighbor lost her home, at 94, because of a reverse mortgage. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #6
There are some vile people out there Politicub Jun 2019 #8
You mean the Tom Selleck endorsed reverse mortgages by any chance? czarjak Jun 2019 #9
This is a very good, well-researched article. gristy Jun 2019 #10
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is DeminPennswoods Jun 2019 #11
My aunt was married to a guy who she divorced from who did a reverse mortgage kimbutgar Jun 2019 #12
I was just going to say FAWK TOM SELLECK. a kennedy Jun 2019 #20
Reverse mortgages were scam from Day 1 benld74 Jun 2019 #15
Unfortunately, they got my neighbors home, well the State of Texas took it MagickMuffin Jun 2019 #18
Did the homeowners just think it was free money and they still got to keep their homes anyway? MichMan Jun 2019 #19
It's worrying that people can make Codeine Jun 2019 #21

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
1. When Fred Thompson was doing ads for these he'd mention that they were part of a bill signed
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 09:43 PM
Jun 2019

by Reagan. That immediatly made me suspect it wasn't a good deal for the middle class.

And I notice more recent ads have stopped mentioning his name.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
2. This is a serious issue.
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 10:07 PM
Jun 2019

We have several couples in our Village whom bought into this scam only to be facing loss of their homes. There is no free lunch. These folks just assumed they would not have to pay any of the expenses like Taxes and Insurance. And the take out,is not worth the grief.

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
3. I did not mean to make light of it
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 10:36 PM
Jun 2019

One of my friends got it into her head this would be a great deal for her parents. I, and another friend, got worried when the friend pushing it clearly had not dug into it. So, we got hold of one of the siblings we knew would do her homework and she put a stop to it. (God bless my pal, she'd do anything for you, but we knew if we told her this was a bad idea she'd push it harder, but we knew her sister would be listened to.)


 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
4. Just because one recieves a check monthly
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 10:52 PM
Jun 2019

from whom ever the Reverse Mortgage Company is,that does not mean all other expenses automatically cease. Couple of the mentioned couples thought they could pass their Homes onto their Children and set up their Wills accordingly. Well that no can do. Unless you repay all of what one has received plus interest and fees. Sad part is,the Transfer of Title is only in one of the Couples name and if he passes. Well she is out on the street. If she had been a signee on the Title at transfer,she would be allowed to stay and receive her same monthly stipend.


Believe Minnesota Real Estate Law has some type of Homestead Covenant that forbids this type of Foreclosure Actions to take place if the Property is covered under the State Homestead Rules. When the couple first purchased the property.

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
5. I don't understand how this can be legal
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 10:56 PM
Jun 2019

the creeps who prey on people and steal their homes should be in prison.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
16. Liz Warren warned the Nation as to what
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 12:40 AM
Jun 2019

was going on and the Media said nothing. It might upset the Ad Department. Now with Mnuchin,he has rolled back the Consumer Protection Rules. We have not seen the real ugly to come.

There was one of these so called information Meetings at our Club House Last Fall. Understand several people signed up for these Rip Offs believing the B.S. and some have already are having issues do to what I mentioned before.

Sorry to say,these are mostly retired Military and not going to say who or what their politics are but your guess should be easy.

Folks do not understand that they can not just sell their homes or cash out and move or go live with the Kids. Course,that is what ultimately Happens anyway or become homeless.

Sad that it is perfectly legal to Market these as a Investment type of tool.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
17. That's a pretty dumb assumption if they were paying it all along.
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 03:35 PM
Jun 2019

If the mortgage company sold them the house insurance, as they usually do, the premiums are very high.
So the owners thought a new loan/reverse mortgage would include everything that went into escrow for the original loan?

we ended up with our payments going to Ditech, which used to be a sleazy collection company, and jumped into the mortgage serving biz after the 2008 crash.
Ditech hated that our mortgage allows us to pay our own insurance ( we don't have to pay any property taxes) because they make a fortune on their escrow income.

Ditech is now in bankruptcy process for various crimes and misdemeanors that have caught up with them.

I shan't miss those breathless monthly offers for a reverse mortgage.

mountain grammy

(26,622 posts)
14. Yes, I remember those ads..
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 12:25 AM
Jun 2019

a bit creepy, then Reagan. Bad deal.

So many of us believe we could never be scammed, but it's easy. It's happened to me (on a small scale) luckily, something I could recover from in a couple of years, but it taught me. Still, sometimes things sound so good and all that print is so fine... watch out y'all. America's a cruel place, not much room for error.

SunSeeker

(51,559 posts)
6. Yep. A neighbor lost her home, at 94, because of a reverse mortgage.
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 11:18 PM
Jun 2019

It was really sad. She kept saying: "I just lived too long."

czarjak

(11,278 posts)
9. You mean the Tom Selleck endorsed reverse mortgages by any chance?
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 11:29 PM
Jun 2019

“I trust ____, I think you can too”? Famous last words, rubes.

gristy

(10,667 posts)
10. This is a very good, well-researched article.
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 11:42 PM
Jun 2019

Kudos to USA Today and reporters Nick Penzenstadler and Jeff Kelly Lowenstein.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
11. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 11:53 PM
Jun 2019

Tom Selleck as the pitchman for this product made me immediately suspicious.

kimbutgar

(21,155 posts)
12. My aunt was married to a guy who she divorced from who did a reverse mortgage
Wed Jun 12, 2019, 11:53 PM
Jun 2019

He was a Tuskegee airman who lost his house at age 97 because he outlived the reverse mortgage, he died a 4 months later after they foreclosed on his house he owned for 40 years,

Every time I see those Tom Selleck commercials I curse him for scamming elderly people.

benld74

(9,904 posts)
15. Reverse mortgages were scam from Day 1
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 12:29 AM
Jun 2019

Sort of like the
Balloon payments on certain mortgage loans

Anything that sounds too good to be true

IT IS

MagickMuffin

(15,943 posts)
18. Unfortunately, they got my neighbors home, well the State of Texas took it
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 03:53 PM
Jun 2019

She got scammed by "You have won a million dollars, we just need you to send us some money first, then we can send you your millions!"

She reversed mortgaged her home. She sent them the money she received.

She told a church friend who called Adult services and they carted my neighbor away to a nursing home. I had no idea this was going on or I would have intervened.

She got scammed twice.



MichMan

(11,932 posts)
19. Did the homeowners just think it was free money and they still got to keep their homes anyway?
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 09:12 PM
Jun 2019

I am not understanding how people like Mr. Roebuck received $100K and thought they would still own their homes free and clear afterwards? Did they think it was just free money ?

"Leroy Roebuck’s home was appraised at $112,000 in 2008. That allowed him to take out up to $83,000 in equity. By the time he was solicited for a second reverse mortgage, an appraiser said it was worth $241,000, allowing him up to $163,000 more. He borrowed $102,000 in all."

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
21. It's worrying that people can make
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 10:13 PM
Jun 2019

such foolish decisions. That does not, of course, justify predatory loan practices.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Seniors face foreclosure ...