If she were a decent person, without deceit and hate in her heart, her outward appearance would undoubtedly be more pleasant to gaze upon. When I see her on the podium with the ever-present disdainful sneer as she is lying and deceiving the American public, it shows.

I couldn’t even stand to look at her.

That’s kind of mean although it’s a proven fact that lying makes you less than pretty. Look at Trunpolini, in a younger day he was a 4, now he is a negative 6.

Reflects on the outside.

That was my read.

That matters.

It's an "example" of the "lyin' press" per this guy. You're looking at it through the eyes of his opposition.

There are other sources, like direct sources, of things. No need to use rightwingnut sources.

People need to get more discriminating on where they get their info from. I've seen several things here that are fake, and no one even questioned it. Aren't we critical of Trumpers for being gullible and not checking sources directly; they just automatically believe anything negative about the opposition?

Now, can they just start using the same word for Trump? No more white-washing his lies as "misleading" or "false-hoods."

a strong dose of truth. Sarah Huckabee Sanders will be remembered.

But not in a good way!

to the Post.

that the Team Trump is bringing the Firehose of Falsehoods to the battle and the Washington Post has the squirt gun of truth on their side.

'Cause that pic does not do justice to that woman's inner black soul and pure dishonesty.

Interesting.

Obviously, he and his kind think it's a horrible thing the Post has done. Does it change the intent, or content of what the Post did?

They’ll only bite you in the hand later.
Just post the Post tweet and ignore the middleman liar.

And I am being kind.

Michelle Wolf was right on at the correspondents dinner.

"...she burns facts and then she uses that ash to create a perfect smokey eye" shows only one of the two looked perfect. The other--not so much. Wolf had also made fun of Sarah's looks and not just her demeanor--a two for one joke reflecting that Sarah is as crooked on the outside as inside.

makeup technique. Wolf's reference did not single out one of Sanders' eyes.

I rest my case.

I wouldn't dream of criticizing her and was very sorry that others did after her performance at the White House Correspondents Dinner. She rocked.

most subtle satire that I've ever seen. I think that's why many people missed her point.

Just think how difficult it would be for her to defend alleged wrongdoing by one of her kids.

By definition, she IS a liar. A proven on videotape LIAR!

I would predict that her kids will suffer in any conflict because their mother would have no credence in defending them.

prizes, too. One found a stray dog, took it into the woods, tortured it then skinned it alive. The other tried to board a commercial flight with a loaded gun. These Southern preachers really know how to raise kids, don't they? Seems like Sarah was the pick of that litter. No kidding, REALLY the pick of the litter.

She does not even know the harm that she has done to herself, her family, the country.

May the dark delusions of sentient beings be dispelled.
May all beings enjoy profound brilliant glory.

None of these right-wing blowhards care. They've got theirs and the hell with everybody else.

So glad to see you go. You miserable, lying piece of trash.

she's DISGUSTING

Back into the hole in the ground you crawled out of!

history is going to think of her.

she is on the outside.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I cannot think of anyone who has gone on to bigger and better things, with their reputation intact, after being associated with Trump.

He seemed to get out as unscathed as possible. Perhaps he's just smart enough to keep a low profile for a few years?

Though, I can't honestly say. I haven't heard his name for a while. That's my only evidence of his possible success.

... he volunteered for and was accepted into the Navy . Perhaps he is trying to make amends?

Whoa. If nothing else it sounds like he's had a spiritual crisis of some sort. And yes, possibly a way to make amends. But I have to say that doesn't appear very Republican like.

Isn't he a bit old to be joining the navy?

... at his age. He had to make a special and very competitive application in which he had to explain his motivation. He apparently had some exposure to naval personal while in the white house and was inspired by them.

Google it. I read it in WaPo I think.

I have a subscription to WP. I'll give it a search.

destruction are in their blind devotion to Trump, along with their hunger for status and power. He just give them free rein to fully express their darkest side. Sanders didn't "change," she just let her inner demons out.

You're right, all these folks knowingly made a Faustian Bargain with Trump, the Devil's Spawn. They lost their souls in the process.

CNN just reported that "WH aides" are blaming Sarah Sanders for Trump's disastrous interview with George Stephanopoulos.

last evening. One part ABC teased was the beginning where Stephanopolous is already in the limo and Trump opens the door and says to his aides (or whoever was around) "Look who it is!". It was like a delighted child who just found out that one of his/her favorite TV stars showed up at the door just to hang out with him/her for a day.

Had no idea Stephanopolous spent 30 hours tagging along with Trump. Don't know how he kept a straight face the whole time. Stephanopolous served in the Clinton WH so he knows how "presidenting" is supposed to be done.

Unfortunately, exposure in time mostly reveals the physical and not so much the financial power. We have a long way to go toward transparency in both.

Democrats will always at least try.

should be next.

Like all of those in the Trump Swamp, what will we find what she did?

Is it monetary?
Is it getting dirty with some young press intern?
Is it selling out our country?

What ever is it, WE WILL FIND OUT!

I'm sure with a sufficient advance many book publishers will jump at the chance.

The advance from Huck to the publishers, of course.

At remainder shelves, everywhere!

is mightier than the rubber duckie toy the President dangles.

Instead of getting the information from a neutral, news, or liberal source.

Got it. DU sure has changed. Now it's giving Trumpers a platform to get a bigger audience.

Here's this guy's twitter account. He's the DailyWire.com, too. A Trumper. He has hit tweets on CNN, Hillary Clinton, etc.

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra

put something on instagram. Someone tweets it. Someone else sees it. It appears here. I don't get your problem.
https://www.instagram.com/washingtonpost/?hl=en

It also puts trust in a rightwingnut. NO ONE verified the Wash Post Instagram. (Yes, I saw it separately)

This is not the only time. This is happening more and more often in this forum. Citing a Trumper source. Twice before it was FAKE. The thing is...if people like what it says, that's good enough for them. They don't verify, don't even care who the source is. Like a shark feeding frenzy.

It's disappointing. Most DU members are a little better at keeping to facts and appropriate sources.

One of the things I 've liked most about DU is its reliance on facts, and real information cited to valid, legit sources.

in order to say what the Washington Post said?

People seem perplexed that there's an issue with citing to a rightwingnut source. Isn't there a rule against that?

Well, "whatever, Martha."

The source of information is the Washington Post. That it was posted to Twitter by a right-wing loon is irrelevant and making a fuss about that just distracts from the information in the Washington Post.

In fact, I'm going to head on over to the little shit's Twitter account and have many laughs at his expense. How helpful of you to post the link right to him...

And I mean that sincerely. We’re in a battle for the heart and soul of America and it’s all hands on deck.

Forget TV comedies, give me the social media comments section...