General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCalifornia Is Considering Ending Criminal Court Fees and Wiping Out Billions in Debt
Unlike fines, which include traffic tickets, fees are not meant to be punitive. But because theyre charged to a high proportion of low-income people who cannot afford to pay, they end up being punitive, Stuhldreher said. The only job of a fee is to recoup costs. A recent national report found two-thirds of people on probation make less than $20,000 per year and nearly 40 percent make less than $10,000 per year. A 2015 survey found that mothers pay nearly 50 percent of court costs. A respondent from Oakland said the costs amounted to everything my mother had in savings, and it meant she went back to working paycheck to paycheck. Greene put it simply: We know the way that policing happensyou can map race, ethnicity, levels of poverty by it.
A little over a year ago, San Francisco eliminated many local court fees and some fines after reviewing the coalitions analysis. Neighboring Alameda County followed suit after similar lobbying. Both also discharged debt, eliminating more than $70 million across the two counties. SB 144 would do at the state level what we did in San Francisco, said Stuhldreher.
Theres precedent at the state level too. In 2018, California eliminated juvenile administrative fees, but it didnt include debt elimination. Los Angeles County decided to eliminate juvenile debt independently, and thereby wiped out $89 million in debt.
The problem lies in how that revenue is generated. The US Department of Justices report after the protests in Ferguson, Missouri, showed 40 percent of the city budgets revenue came from fines and fees, which led to a focus on generating revenue in the police department. It brought in money but harmed the city.
San Francisco discovered the same issues. We were handing people a bill for a few thousand bucks when they got out of jail, Stuhldreher noted. It just didnt make sense. The math didnt add up. The fees are charged to very low-income people who cannot pay them.
But there could soon be a solution. PFM launched the Center for Justice and Safety Finance to help forge a national model for reducing revenue from criminal justice fines and fees. The group is working with three countiesDallas in Texas, Davidson in Tennessee, and Ramsey in Minnesotato develop plans. Funded by a $1.3 grant from the Arnold Foundation, its an explicit test run, said Eichenthal, to create a blueprint for local government to end reliance on the criminal justice system for revenue.
He says many local governments want to make the change but are not sure how to do it. Theyre just sort of frozen in their ability to move forward until they can answer the question of, can you do this in a fiscally responsible way? he said.
read more at https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/06/california-is-considering-ending-criminal-court-fees-and-wiping-out-billions-in-debt/
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)His proposal announced Thursday is up $4.5 billion from his first budget plan released in January.
It includes a $21.5 billion surplus that is unchanged from January but remains the largest surplus in at least 20 years.
He now hands the proposal to state lawmakers, who must pass a budget by June 15 or lose pay.
The Democratic governor's proposal puts $15 billion toward state reserves and paying down debt, up $1.4 billion from January.
Newsom has added about $150 million in grants to local governments to deal with homelessness, calling the problem "a stain on the state."
He's added $40 million to deal with wildfires and natural disasters.
https://www.kron4.com/news/california/governor-newsom-to-reveal-updated-spending-plan/1992384433
pecosbob
(7,541 posts)and balancing their budgets on the backs of the poor has always been a road to failure, not to mention a disgrace of national proportion.
hardluck
(639 posts)I used to work pro bono on skid row representing indigent persons on quality of life tickets like jaywalking and littering. Basically, an indigent person would get a $24 jaywalking ticket but with fees that would end up being over $120, which of course they could not pay. It would then go to warrant and allow the person to get picked up by the LAPD if they wanted to. It was/is a way for the city to "clean up" areas and keep the homeless towards skid row. For a time, I had a deal worked out with the city attorney to dismiss hundreds of these warrants/tickets at a time. Alas, about a decade ago, the city reneged on the deal and I had to fight each ticket individually.