General Discussion

pnwmom

(108,980 posts) Mon Jul 8, 2019, 04:14 PM Jul 2019

They probably won't have to get Epstein to flip on Trump (thereby reducing his sentence.)

He's been charged with conspiracy, which means those unnamed employees in the indictment are part of a conspiracy.

They just haven't been charged yet. I bet the prosecutors are pushing them to flip -- and that they'll have a lot of useful information to share.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

They probably won't have to get Epstein to flip on Trump (thereby reducing his sentence.) (Original Post) pnwmom Jul 2019 OP

Maybe wishful thinking that Trump was involved in this...not seeing any evidence, now... Thomas Hurt Jul 2019 #1

A malignant narcissist wouldn't take a risk because someone helped out a "buddy." pnwmom Jul 2019 #2

yeah maybe buddy is the wrong term, more like acosta is a good apparatchik Thomas Hurt Jul 2019 #3

Agreed. onenote Jul 2019 #4

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)

1. Maybe wishful thinking that Trump was involved in this...not seeing any evidence, now...

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Mon Jul 8, 2019, 04:20 PM

Jul 2019

did he give Acosta a cabinet position because he helped out his buddy.....sure.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)

2. A malignant narcissist wouldn't take a risk because someone helped out a "buddy."

Reply to Thomas Hurt (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 8, 2019, 04:24 PM

Jul 2019

MN's don't have buddies. They only have people who are useful to them -- or not.

Somehow Trump considered both Epstein and Acosta to be useful to him.

And don't forget that a woman filed suit in 2016 alleging that Trump had raped her at Epstein's NY mansion in 2013. Her photo might be one of the hundreds they've found in that locked safe. We don't know what's in it yet.

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)

3. yeah maybe buddy is the wrong term, more like acosta is a good apparatchik

Reply to pnwmom (Reply #2)

Mon Jul 8, 2019, 04:28 PM

Jul 2019

and helped to cover for the entitled rich and party.

onenote

(42,714 posts)

4. Agreed.

Reply to Thomas Hurt (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 8, 2019, 04:32 PM

Jul 2019

Folks are doing a lot of speculating that there is a smoking gun that can be used against Trump in the Epstein case. And that's fine as long as folks keep in mind that it's just speculation without any hard evidence.

Reply to this discussion