General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew Subpoenas from the Constitutional Accountability Center, led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/08/politics/trump-organization-subpoena/index.htmlCongressional Democrats have issued subpoenas to the Trump Organization and other Trump businesses tied to a lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump of profiting from foreign governments in violation of the Constitution, but the Justice Department is now asking an appeals court to step in and block the move.
Democrats sent more than three-dozen subpoenas, demanding a response by July 29, seeking to collect evidence about the President's financial records, after a federal judge ruled last month that Democrats could proceed with the legal discovery process in their lawsuit.
But the Justice Department, defending Trump in his presidential capacity, has requested that an appeals court Monday overrule the lower court's decision and prevent the subpoenas from going forward. If the Democratic members of Congress collected evidence in the emoluments lawsuit, DOJ wrote, Trump "is likely to suffer irreparable injury" because of "intrusive discovery into his personal finances based on the public office he holds."
The escalating court fight represents a new front in Democrats' quest to obtain the President's financial records, a battle that's now playing out across multiple congressional committees and judicial jurisdictions.
The new subpoenas come from the Constitutional Accountability Center, which is representing a group of House and Senate Democrats led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler of New York, who are alleging Trump is violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution.
Barr must be impeached
Response to malaise (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)Makes me wonder if he has an affiliation with Epstein somewhere along the way.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Blackmail. Or the fear of being blackmailed. Im thinking of the GOP, the Senate, etc.
Response to Generic Brad (Reply #11)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)Karadeniz
(22,539 posts)Happens to be president. Well, duh!!!! That's their job, to protect us from money grubbing tyrants. So the DoJ position is that congressional oversight should not occur if it might embarrass the subject of the investigation. Weird.
malaise
(269,063 posts)venal and corrupt.
triron
(22,007 posts)alwaysinasnit
(5,066 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,011 posts)(that's the usual justification provided re not indicting a sitting President)
malaise
(269,063 posts)supposedly
sinkingfeeling
(51,461 posts)CloudWatcher
(1,850 posts)Perhaps if Trump had actually read the Constitution before swearing to uphold it, he might have noticed that conforming to the Emoluments Clause requires that Congress be given 'intrusive discovery into his personal finances'. Otherwise how could they possibly do their job?
It's stunning that the DOJ is fighting this; Barr is an embarrassment.
erronis
(15,303 posts)In legalese: The Steel Stallion.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)theyre scrambling like crazy.
Im also thinking of Trump trying to claim the conditions hes forcing on children in his concentration camps are so much better than the conditions in their native countries. Therefore, in his defective mind, they are so much better off!!
Volaris
(10,272 posts)And put all of his business interests into a truly blind trust, and taken the money on the back end.
That he didn't, isn't congress's fault. He can fuck right off.
dweller
(23,642 posts)suffered irreparable injury...
😡
✌🏼️