Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:31 PM Jul 2019

So, Is Mocking Children OK if They Are Children of Republicans?

I will not link to it, but there is a thread in General Discussion that engages in mockery of children and the wife of a Republican official. It goes on and on in its mockery, too, with participants in that behavior who are surprising to me.

There are truly some awful people in Donald Trump's circle. Deplorable, terrible people. I have no problem with posts that call such people out. None whatsoever. Their actions demonstrate their disgusting character.

But, are those people's spouses and children fair game for our mockery and disgust? I do not think so. What horrible thing has some young child done that is worthy of such name-calling and ugly jokes about their appearance?

Why would such a thread, illustrated with photos, even appear here on DU? Here's what I suggest: Don't post that shit here. Instead, post photos of your own family and children so people can weigh in on their appearance. Post photos of yourself for judgement by a bunch of strangers. But, don't post photos of other people's families if the goal is mockery.

That's just rude. That's what the other side does. Let's not behave like the deplorable Trump-followers, OK.

I'm disgusted by this today, so I'm posting this OP. We can do better. Much better. I suggest we do just that.

189 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, Is Mocking Children OK if They Are Children of Republicans? (Original Post) MineralMan Jul 2019 OP
I am pretty sure that's a photoshop MyNameGoesHere Jul 2019 #1
What does that matter? MineralMan Jul 2019 #9
Which part? MyNameGoesHere Jul 2019 #20
Clearly, you are not understanding why I wrote the post. MineralMan Jul 2019 #27
Clearly I do MyNameGoesHere Jul 2019 #32
Those are two little girls held up for mockery. How is any of this their fault? Hekate Jul 2019 #46
I'm not blaming anyone MyNameGoesHere Jul 2019 #115
My thoughts, for what they are worth trc Jul 2019 #47
It's not. Now what? Iggo Jul 2019 #13
Let me check my level of MyNameGoesHere Jul 2019 #30
It's not zero sum. Iggo Jul 2019 #35
The photo is not shaming a republican that enabled a child rapist. Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #59
The dude is the rapist. Not his family LakeArenal Jul 2019 #82
According to Snopes its real. AJT Jul 2019 #15
Its not a photo shop. marble falls Aug 2019 #189
Adult children are OK if they involve themselves treestar Jul 2019 #2
Those people are part of the Trump Administration MineralMan Jul 2019 #5
Agree completely. BKDem Jul 2019 #112
Yes! Yes it is okay to mock the children of republicans... ALL republicans. NewDayOranges Jul 2019 #3
. Iggo Jul 2019 #4
So, you're using the "But Johnny Did It" excuse? MineralMan Jul 2019 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Polly Hennessey Jul 2019 #41
No. That photo did not need to be posted, and was posted MineralMan Jul 2019 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author Polly Hennessey Jul 2019 #58
Thanks MM. LakeArenal Jul 2019 #84
I agree plcdude Jul 2019 #108
I do not know what party you belong to..but it is NOT okay in my Democratic Party Peacetrain Jul 2019 #10
Ivanka and Sarah Huckabee Sanders are adults MustLoveBeagles Jul 2019 #53
Exactly charliea Jul 2019 #96
As you will discover over time, we try to be better than that here. Chelsea was not the WH dog... Hekate Jul 2019 #64
Wow! Way to pile on, folks... NewDayOranges Jul 2019 #105
We are better than that here. Full stop. In a message forum with thousands of Politicub Jul 2019 #117
Whatever, you can get down off your shoebox now... NewDayOranges Jul 2019 #132
Nah, I like it up here. Politicub Jul 2019 #133
"Shoebox?" cwydro Jul 2019 #172
Adults aren't children zaj Jul 2019 #174
Hi MineralMan - Very well said. Pendrench Jul 2019 #6
I do not give a damn what party a child's parents are Doreen Jul 2019 #8
Thanks, MineralMan. Iggo Jul 2019 #11
My pleasure. MineralMan Jul 2019 #14
Some of us really do appreciate you speaking up ripcord Jul 2019 #140
K&R... spanone Jul 2019 #12
Thank you, MineralMan. Adsos Letter Jul 2019 #16
The mocking I've seen is more toward the photo. AJT Jul 2019 #17
Thats me. snort Jul 2019 #68
Yeah, with the old man standing to the side, all out of focus. LuvNewcastle Jul 2019 #122
we should mock the parents for the appearance of their children AlexSFCA Jul 2019 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Iggo Jul 2019 #22
I take it back. No need to start that shit. Iggo Jul 2019 #26
I agree children are off limits peasant one Jul 2019 #19
THANK YOU snowybirdie Jul 2019 #21
"mocking" seems to be an extreme term to use treestar Jul 2019 #23
I don't think so. MineralMan Jul 2019 #31
I could post pretty similar photos of my sister and I when we were that age Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #65
Me too, and to add insult to injury my parents made Christmas cards out of them! cwydro Jul 2019 #125
Mine too. n/t Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #130
Lol! cwydro Jul 2019 #137
Ours were ones my mom made. Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #147
LMAO! My mom did that to my younger sister and I as well. jcmaine72 Jul 2019 #163
Dressing little sisters alike is a thing. Kind of an old-fashioned thing, but once considered cute. Hekate Jul 2019 #89
I saw two little girls at the supermarket about an hour ago. MineralMan Jul 2019 #106
Thank you for this. cwydro Jul 2019 #24
They're locking up kids in cages. We can't point out a resemblance to actors from The Shining NightWatcher Jul 2019 #25
So, attacking other children is a good thing for what reason? MineralMan Jul 2019 #33
so we can't afford kindness toward children? stopdiggin Jul 2019 #73
Kindness isn't even expensive ripcord Jul 2019 #142
I'm just saying the older one of them looks like she should play a Damian-like character mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #28
I'm not going to sue you. MineralMan Jul 2019 #37
Someday she'll grow up and be mortified that her parents dressed her that way mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #55
all justifications for mocking a 10 year old. today. nt stopdiggin Jul 2019 #79
In the meantime, those are two young children. MineralMan Jul 2019 #91
I'm not mortified my parents dressed me like my sister as children. And gave us those haircuts. cwydro Jul 2019 #126
Was your dad Alex Acosta? mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #127
As long as you feel good about yourself MISTER Lebowski. cwydro Jul 2019 #138
"I'm just saying..." Iggo Jul 2019 #43
If you really think it's "self-evident", what motivates you to keep pointing it out? sl8 Jul 2019 #51
It's actually only that one time ... mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #88
Ah, well, as long as you're not "alone" in this "state of mind" that makes it ok, right? cwydro Jul 2019 #139
Thank you :-) Soph0571 Jul 2019 #29
Incredible post,thanks. virgogal Jul 2019 #34
If the spouse is participating in the horribleness, yes wryter2000 Jul 2019 #36
we are now living under a fascist, criminal, republican dictatorship, sorry, taking the high road yaesu Jul 2019 #38
You are free to behave however you wish, of course. MineralMan Jul 2019 #40
I agree Stargazer09 Jul 2019 #39
Always, children should be off-limits unless adult children involved in politics. Good OP. Nt emmaverybo Jul 2019 #42
In this case it's not all about the kids bitterross Jul 2019 #45
Please proceed. You are continuing the very process I'm objecting too. MineralMan Jul 2019 #48
I understand your disdain for my comments. bitterross Jul 2019 #145
Generally... Mike Nelson Jul 2019 #49
Trump's progeny are not children. They are adults who work in his administration. Iggo Jul 2019 #60
Donny Two Scoop's kids - Beavis, Butthead and Ivanka are part of the story by choice ... marble falls Aug 2019 #188
Thank you, MineralMan. wendyb-NC Jul 2019 #50
I mocked Pence in that pic ProudLib72 Jul 2019 #52
Well said. mac56 Jul 2019 #54
I didn't see the thread on here, but I did see it on twitter. PatrickforO Jul 2019 #56
Very well said nt ripcord Jul 2019 #143
Thank you. You are right and I'm glad you said it! StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #57
I totally agree. nt LAS14 Jul 2019 #61
Has that not always been the policy of some posters here? hughee99 Jul 2019 #62
I will say Turin_C3PO Jul 2019 #71
There's usually two groups here on any such discussion hughee99 Jul 2019 #76
I try and stay grounded in the first group Turin_C3PO Jul 2019 #81
It's not my attitude. n/t PatrickforO Jul 2019 #144
Thank you MineralMan for calling this out MustLoveBeagles Jul 2019 #63
No, not at all. Turin_C3PO Jul 2019 #66
When I was a child, I sometimes acted out inappropriately. MineralMan Jul 2019 #93
Remember the lessons you learned as a child.... mtngirl47 Jul 2019 #67
My take on that picture and that thread Merlot Jul 2019 #69
I agree, there is a very strange dynamic going on in that photograph, but it is not the fault smirkymonkey Jul 2019 #120
Thanks MinMan. It quickly got tasteless and excessive. Hekate Jul 2019 #70
I agree- Minor children should be off limits tulipsandroses Jul 2019 #72
Says the man who refers to italian-american as "goombas" Drahthaardogs Jul 2019 #74
Then you remember to whom I was referring, right? MineralMan Jul 2019 #107
I guess we all have our 'reasons' for misbehaving at times, don't we? mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #128
Fine line between observing and mocking. The kids do look creepy and... TreasonousBastard Jul 2019 #75
Those are my thoughts. It's the photo and the way the parents groomed & dressed the girls.... Honeycombe8 Jul 2019 #90
That Acosta expressed no concern whatsoever for those little girls that Epstein all but "destroyed" hlthe2b Jul 2019 #77
There are many duers who post their dismay with their family members who believe in trump. Tech Jul 2019 #78
I am glad to see there are a lot of recs for this thread. Tipperary Jul 2019 #80
Yes. Unfortunately, this isn't new. Turin_C3PO Jul 2019 #83
The jury voted that this is acceptable. SCVDem Jul 2019 #85
I neither alerted on that post, nor was I on any jury. MineralMan Jul 2019 #94
We rarely disagree. SCVDem Jul 2019 #97
In this case, the victims were someone's wife and two girl children, MineralMan Jul 2019 #109
I agree SCVDem Jul 2019 #110
OVER THE LINE!!! (nt) mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #129
And many of us disagree with that thread. Tipperary Jul 2019 #99
When I read your OP, I totally agreed. I didn't see the thread in GD. Then I saw the photo.... Honeycombe8 Jul 2019 #86
I live in an neighborhood with a very diverse population. MineralMan Jul 2019 #102
Oh, I'm not offended at all. Honeycombe8 Jul 2019 #124
mine was post # 19 IcyPeas Jul 2019 #87
While I agree with most of your opinon, MineralMan. Texin Jul 2019 #92
I don't know about you, but I have never heard of Acosta's wife. MineralMan Jul 2019 #95
Some us are really just so wound up and pissed off that we're not acting like ourselves ... mr_lebowski Jul 2019 #98
Not at all. Kind of Blue Jul 2019 #100
The parents are responsible for the appearance Duppers Jul 2019 #101
Some of the posts were of that nature. MineralMan Jul 2019 #103
Spouses? That's going to depend upon their own actions and the same cstanleytech Jul 2019 #104
I agree... tonedevil Jul 2019 #111
Thank you for posting this. I see a lot of hypocrisy on a few issues here oldsoftie Jul 2019 #113
I am not one of those.... quickesst Jul 2019 #114
It used to be pretty standard. Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #161
Did you and your sibling.... quickesst Jul 2019 #175
Pretty much identical haircuts, at that age. Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #177
Ok..... quickesst Jul 2019 #179
You suggested parents were setting "their children up to invite ridicule" Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #180
This message was self-deleted by its author quickesst Jul 2019 #185
I didn't say you did ridicule those children. Ms. Toad Jul 2019 #186
Thank you for posting this I totally agree. redstatebluegirl Jul 2019 #116
Yes. Republicans mocked Chelsea Clinton and the Obama daughters. left-of-center2012 Jul 2019 #118
I made a comment on the original thread...I think JDC Jul 2019 #119
I feel MM, kozar Jul 2019 #121
It made me uncomfortable too. lostnfound Jul 2019 #123
Mocking unjustified! Lucid Dreamer Jul 2019 #131
Maybe you haven't heard kacekwl Jul 2019 #134
I see. MineralMan Jul 2019 #135
I don't want them to apologize for making fun of children. Iggo Jul 2019 #156
Caging children and mocking children fescuerescue Jul 2019 #136
There are several reasons I stayed out of that picture thread. LuckyCharms Jul 2019 #141
If they are of high school age or less, absolutely no. Initech Jul 2019 #146
Junior, Eric, and Ivanka aren't children. The OP is talking about children. Iggo Jul 2019 #154
Nope. Not unless they are adults and get political themselves. applegrove Jul 2019 #148
It's cool... TexasBlueDog Jul 2019 #149
If they are using their children as props? Yes. alphafemale Jul 2019 #150
Hardly fair to mock actual children as children have almost no legal say so in such a situation. cstanleytech Jul 2019 #152
It's okay if they're not looking. Iggo Jul 2019 #155
Two points grantcart Jul 2019 #151
Thank you Progressive dog Jul 2019 #153
+1 forthemiddle Jul 2019 #157
You are wasting your time arguing with sagesnow Jul 2019 #158
This isn't a DU policy, but it *should* be added. zaj Jul 2019 #159
Well, I think the admins of this site are determined to let the MineralMan Jul 2019 #162
Jurors and report'ers are given directions. zaj Jul 2019 #173
It's unfortunately pragmatism in action ck4829 Jul 2019 #160
Perhaps. Perhaps not. MineralMan Jul 2019 #164
Remember, Mineral Man Polly Hennessey Jul 2019 #176
I agree that children and families should be off limts. jcmaine72 Jul 2019 #165
If they are old enough to do that, they are adults, not children. MineralMan Jul 2019 #167
Well, I would event extend that to include non-political adults as well. jcmaine72 Jul 2019 #178
We can be rude to them after they turn out to be horrible little chips off the block. Mc Mike Jul 2019 #166
Those are adults, not children. MineralMan Jul 2019 #168
That wasn't posted in disagreement with your op, Min. Mc Mike Jul 2019 #169
I know you weren't. Thanks. MineralMan Jul 2019 #170
Recced, nt Mc Mike Jul 2019 #171
Interesting... ConnorMarc Jul 2019 #181
Yes, I thought so... MineralMan Jul 2019 #183
Minors and adult children who are not very publicly political are off limits to me. Kaleva Jul 2019 #182
Depends on the person. Really. LanternWaste Jul 2019 #184
I agree with you. Acosta is fair game, he voluntarily became part of the sordid story, Ms Acosta ... marble falls Aug 2019 #187
 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
1. I am pretty sure that's a photoshop
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:34 PM
Jul 2019

I remember a scene from the Twilight Zone very similar. But even so I only have one question. Why is Pence checking out Acostas ass?

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
27. Clearly, you are not understanding why I wrote the post.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:51 PM
Jul 2019

So, I'm not going to discuss details with you. Not a chance.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
32. Clearly I do
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:57 PM
Jul 2019

Just not sure how someone musters outrage over a photo of a child rapist enablers family photo.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
115. I'm not blaming anyone
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:13 PM
Jul 2019

I just can't get outraged over a creepy photo of a child rapist enabler and his Twilight Zone family.

I got a shit load of outrage about photo of children in cages however.

trc

(823 posts)
47. My thoughts, for what they are worth
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:08 PM
Jul 2019

Are that the "child rapist enabler," and he is that, no question, is absolutely fair game for scorn and ridicule. But his kids are not, nor should his wife be...they had nothing to do with this guy's betrayal of the accusers. It is an odd looking photo to be sure, but they are kids...KIDS. They do not deserve to be dragged into this because they look a certain way in a pic or based upon who their father is. Shaming these two girls is repugnant, defending that shaming is also repugnant.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
30. Let me check my level of
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:55 PM
Jul 2019

Outrage that someone is using a bizarre crazy ass photo to shame a republican that enabled a child rapist.








Meter says -100 % of outrage on protecting a child rapist enabler.
Seems protecting a child rapist enabler outrage over a photo isn't at the top of my list of things to be outraged over.

Iggo

(47,564 posts)
35. It's not zero sum.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:59 PM
Jul 2019

I can hate a rapist and also be mad at you for making fun of little girls based on their looks.

It's not one or the other.

Ms. Toad

(34,086 posts)
59. The photo is not shaming a republican that enabled a child rapist.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:21 PM
Jul 2019

The photo is shaming two small children, and their mother, who had nothing to do with enabling a child rapist.

LakeArenal

(28,837 posts)
82. The dude is the rapist. Not his family
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:41 PM
Jul 2019

Hating the post and hating the guilty are not mutually exclusive.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
5. Those people are part of the Trump Administration
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:38 PM
Jul 2019

or Trump businesses. They are fair game.

10 year old children are not. 6 year old children, even less. And spouses who have no public position should be left alone, as well. they are not responsible for any of the bad behavior of someone else.

So, when I say children, I mean children, not adults.

NewDayOranges

(692 posts)
3. Yes! Yes it is okay to mock the children of republicans... ALL republicans.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:36 PM
Jul 2019

It is petty and immature but as my government, President and his supporters are constantly harping and boasting about the failures of my party to LOOK OUT for my interests, this is all I have to look forward...

So, yes! Mock ugly-ass Sarah Huckabee Sanders! Mock Ivanka Trump!

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
7. So, you're using the "But Johnny Did It" excuse?
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:39 PM
Jul 2019

Did that work when you were a child? It doesn't work now, either.

You do not have to follow the disgusting lead of others. You can behave well all on your own.

The people you named are all adults and are active in the Trump administration as adults. That is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about young children and spouses who take no public role.

Give me a break!

Response to MineralMan (Reply #7)

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
44. No. That photo did not need to be posted, and was posted
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:06 PM
Jul 2019

solely for the reason that it could be mocked. I wasn't born yesterday.

I'm objecting to that, and I also objected in the thread itself. I will not stand silent while children are being mocked for their appearance in a photo. Nope.

Post a photo of your family, if you wish.

Response to MineralMan (Reply #44)

LakeArenal

(28,837 posts)
84. Thanks MM.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:43 PM
Jul 2019

I wanted to post the same on the post but I didn’t want to spend a beautiful day going back and forth with the unreasonable.

plcdude

(5,310 posts)
108. I agree
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:53 PM
Jul 2019

As I most always do with you. We have to change the way we deal with others on DU. Thanks MM

MustLoveBeagles

(11,632 posts)
53. Ivanka and Sarah Huckabee Sanders are adults
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:12 PM
Jul 2019

Ivanka and Sarah Huckabee Sanders are adults who are or were apart of Trump's administration. They are fair game. Acosta's daughters are underage children who aren't. That's the difference.

charliea

(260 posts)
96. Exactly
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:18 PM
Jul 2019

They have (had) official positions in the Orange Menace's (OM) administration, flay them with words. Leave the kids out of it. I remember the outrage when Rush Limpnuts called Chelsea Clinton a dog, its on you tube and I won't link to it.

It should be that way with all kids, doesn't matter whose kids they are. Don't punch down.

Hekate

(90,779 posts)
64. As you will discover over time, we try to be better than that here. Chelsea was not the WH dog...
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:25 PM
Jul 2019

Chelsea's dad was not Janet Reno. Remember any of that? As it happened, Chelsea Clinton was a 13 year old child in her awkward years who loved her mom and dad, not an adult politician.

We try to be better than that -- we don't always succeed. At the moment, a bit of self-correction is happening, I think.

Whether it is in the TOS or not, we have a rule: leave children out of it. And by "children" we mean youngsters who have not left their teens (like Barron Trump). Full adults like Ivanka, Don Jr, and Eric, who are not merely related to the potus but have inserted themselves into the running of the country and are being paid by us -- they are fair game.

NewDayOranges

(692 posts)
105. Wow! Way to pile on, folks...
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:41 PM
Jul 2019

I said in my post that my feelings were: petty and immature but as my government, President and his supporters are constantly harping and boasting about the failures of my party to LOOK OUT for my interests, this is all I have to look forward...

It's like you guys don't read the entire post...

Anyway, I hope you all continue to be successful in your efforts to be overly polite to a group/faction of people who treat you like whaleshit!

How well is this high-road, kiss the people who want to kill you, tactic working for you all, anyway? Llast time I looked at the scoreboard, the Russians and the republicans were cleaning our clocks!

Politicub

(12,165 posts)
117. We are better than that here. Full stop. In a message forum with thousands of
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:25 PM
Jul 2019

users, it helps to try and understand the culture of DU before you criticize it. As you will see, the vast majority (99.9 percent) of the users do not cotton to attacking children.

There are other boards for misguided people who have a compulsion to target innocent children, but it is not here. Not in any form nor fashion.

That’s not being “overly polite”. It is doing the right thing.

Pendrench

(1,358 posts)
6. Hi MineralMan - Very well said.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:38 PM
Jul 2019

Mocking young children (especially their appearance) goes beyond the pale.

Wishing you well and peace.

Tim

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
8. I do not give a damn what party a child's parents are
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:39 PM
Jul 2019

you DO NOT mock underage children. I would say if they are 16 and are publicly saying bad things about others they are fair game but younger than that is wrong. As far as the adult spouses they are fair game if they are publicly saying bad things as their spouse is but only then.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
14. My pleasure.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:44 PM
Jul 2019

I can only hope that some of the folks in that thread will understand what I'm saying and self-delete their posts in that thread. I was very disappointed to see some of the names who added to the mockery. Very disappointed.

ripcord

(5,507 posts)
140. Some of us really do appreciate you speaking up
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 09:11 PM
Jul 2019

As progressives we rise above the Republicans not sink down to their level.

AJT

(5,240 posts)
17. The mocking I've seen is more toward the photo.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:46 PM
Jul 2019

Who ever took it managed to make the whole family look creepy.

snort

(2,334 posts)
68. Thats me.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:27 PM
Jul 2019

I was riffing on the photo and the idea that these kids would get feedback from an obscure post on a one in a million website is stupid. But being indignant is fun.

LuvNewcastle

(16,855 posts)
122. Yeah, with the old man standing to the side, all out of focus.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 05:20 PM
Jul 2019

He looked like Bela Lugosi in Plan 9 From Outer Space. Who took those photos, Wes Craven?

AlexSFCA

(6,139 posts)
18. we should mock the parents for the appearance of their children
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:47 PM
Jul 2019

Children didn’t choose to look like Handmaid’s tale’s Gilead citizens. They are obviously brainwashed into hard core cult ideology.

Response to AlexSFCA (Reply #18)

treestar

(82,383 posts)
23. "mocking" seems to be an extreme term to use
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:50 PM
Jul 2019

just pointing out somebody has bad taste in haircuts, it's weird to make the two girls identical like that, unless they want to do it - same dress and same haircut. Mocking the parents more. also like Kavanaugh's wife, knowing the father's attitude towards women is questionable, some in the thread sought to see fear or unhappiness.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
31. I don't think so.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:56 PM
Jul 2019

There were comparisons to creepy TV show child characters in there. Mockery, pure and simple.

Now, imagine being a 10-year-old child who was taken somewhere for photos and then encountered people comparing you to a character from the Munsters or some other television program.

Why would anyone do such a thing to a child or say such a thing about a child?

No, sorry. That's just disgusting behavior.

Ms. Toad

(34,086 posts)
65. I could post pretty similar photos of my sister and I when we were that age
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:25 PM
Jul 2019

Close to the same haircuts, and dressed identically to each other.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
137. Lol!
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 08:58 PM
Jul 2019

They had recently been to Germany, so we were wearing little German girl outfits. And the haircuts were just like those girls lol.

It was the 60s, but still. We had many a laugh about those cards over the years.

Ms. Toad

(34,086 posts)
147. Ours were ones my mom made.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 10:35 PM
Jul 2019

Identical little outfits. When I outgrew mine, my sister got it as a hand-me-down - so she got twice as much fun as I had! Our haircuts were pretty close to that, as well.

My grandmother loved to sew I inherited her love of sewing. My mother hated it - and sewed out of economic necessity. The outfits reflected that a bit.

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
163. LMAO! My mom did that to my younger sister and I as well.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:23 PM
Jul 2019

We're only one year apart, and can pass for twins. I think my mom was asked so many times if we were twins that the idea grew on her. She actually started treated us like we really were twins, which included identical haircuts and clothes until we were about six and seven respectively. It was only after we were both getting mercilessly teased at school for wearing the same outfits that it finally occurred to my mom that maybe dressing us in identical clothes wasn't such a hot idea.

Hekate

(90,779 posts)
89. Dressing little sisters alike is a thing. Kind of an old-fashioned thing, but once considered cute.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:56 PM
Jul 2019

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
106. I saw two little girls at the supermarket about an hour ago.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:46 PM
Jul 2019

About the same ages as the two girls in the photo from that other thread. Both were wearing identical dresses and had the same hairstyles as each other. they were with their parents, and seemed to be happy and healthy children.

I don't think it's all that unusual for young siblings to be dressed alike, really. They might even like it if they like each other as sisters a lot.

I can picture mom at Target, looking at the rack of girls dresses. She thinks, "Oh, that's a cute dress!" Then she grabs one in kid's size 6 and another in size 10 and moves on to the grocery section. Busy mom, like all moms. Shortcuts.





 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
24. Thank you for this.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:50 PM
Jul 2019

I posted in that thread to express my disgust.

Sadly, I’m getting less and less surprised by some people here.

Yes, that’s a wonderful idea to have these scornful posters post pics of themselves and their families. I bet they won’t.

ANd you’re right - it IS disgusting.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
25. They're locking up kids in cages. We can't point out a resemblance to actors from The Shining
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:51 PM
Jul 2019

We've got to toughen the fuck up quickly or we'll be steamrolled to death.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
33. So, attacking other children is a good thing for what reason?
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:57 PM
Jul 2019

How does mocking one child help another child who is in a terrible situation?

Think twice before writing. That's always my suggestion.

stopdiggin

(11,354 posts)
73. so we can't afford kindness toward children?
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:31 PM
Jul 2019

So decency (even toward children) has become "optional" as far as our values? And the justification here is, "the other side is doing ...?" No thanks.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
28. I'm just saying the older one of them looks like she should play a Damian-like character
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:51 PM
Jul 2019

in a Horror flick (at least in that particular photo).

Not making fun of her, she just looks like the stereotypical kid that Hollywood would cast as some all-powerful demon in a scary movie. Which are, of course, totally fictitious in nature.

It's not my fault, this observation is simply self-evident. Pretty much just stating the obvious.

So sue me ...

BTW she's never going to read what any of us on DU had to say, either. I'd never SAY it to her face and make her feel bad.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
37. I'm not going to sue you.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:00 PM
Jul 2019

However, never assume that someone is not going to see something and use that as an excuse.

Those two girls are just children. They didn't choose their clothing, nor did they chose to be in a publicly exposed photograph. Children do what their parents ask them to do at that age.

A photograph captures a fraction of a second in time. How many photos of you have not been your best look? Children can't decide which photos people use.

Mocking children in any way over their appearance is a thuggish thing to do. Period. I don't care who they are. They do not deserve mockery from strangers.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
55. Someday she'll grow up and be mortified that her parents dressed her that way
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:13 PM
Jul 2019

and cut her hair that way, and when she finds out that people were making fun of the pic, she'll go 'well that's understandable because that is one creepy-looking scenario (what's Pence looking at there, BTW?) and that photographer caught me looking like I was possessed! YUCK!'

And then it'll be all good between her and me.

That's what I'm assuming, anyways.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
91. In the meantime, those are two young children.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:00 PM
Jul 2019

Your statement that they won't see it is specious. They might. Some other kid might have a parent who openly mocked those children from that photo, which doesn't only appear here on DU. That other kid might bring it to school, pass it around, and make jokes about those two children. Shit like that happens all the time.

You're making excuses for bad behavior. That trick doesn't work. The only thing that works is a sincere apology. Everything else is just a lame excuse.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
126. I'm not mortified my parents dressed me like my sister as children. And gave us those haircuts.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 06:03 PM
Jul 2019

I love my parents and miss them forever. We laughed at those pictures as adults.

However, if some cretin on the internet had made fun of us (impossible in those days), I think I’d feel very sorry for that person.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
127. Was your dad Alex Acosta?
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 06:08 PM
Jul 2019

Didn't think so.

I get it, you and your BFF Tipperary don't like me.

Good thing for me, I don't care

Allow me to add my post below, #98, and that's all I have to say to you on this matter.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
138. As long as you feel good about yourself MISTER Lebowski.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 09:03 PM
Jul 2019

I am not “BFF” with anyone on this board, but I see many agree with Mineral Man - many more than agree with you.

As long as you go to sleep tonight satisfied...yeah, made fun of little girls. Smh.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
88. It's actually only that one time ...
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:54 PM
Jul 2019


Y'all act like I'm the only one who 'did this' ... which is far from the truth. I happen to apparently be the only one who cares to own up to it after being chastened by our friend MM.

But go ahead and pile on. I can take it.

I freely admit that Trump, and everyone associated with him, IN PARTICULAR Alex Acosta at this moment ... has me SO F***ING PISSED OFF, I'm not behaving like 'myself'. I'm guess I'm kinda in 'being a dick to everyone remotely associated with Trump' mode, even if it's a damn kid, which isn't 'me' ... and I don't even know what's going to snap me out of it at this point.

I don't think I'm alone in this 'state of mind'.
 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
139. Ah, well, as long as you're not "alone" in this "state of mind" that makes it ok, right?
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 09:06 PM
Jul 2019

Ever heard of mob mentality?

Gosh, how do you rationalize all your rationalizations for mocking children?

Oh wait, cuz, they have a bad dad. That’s all on them. Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch.

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
29. Thank you :-)
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:53 PM
Jul 2019

I saw it earlier and had the same reaction. Kids should always be off limits. Not their fault their father is a wanker

wryter2000

(46,077 posts)
36. If the spouse is participating in the horribleness, yes
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 01:59 PM
Jul 2019

I'm perfectly comfortable with mocking Melania Trump and all the adult Trump children. I won't mock Barron unless he does something horrid.

yaesu

(8,020 posts)
38. we are now living under a fascist, criminal, republican dictatorship, sorry, taking the high road
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:01 PM
Jul 2019

got us tRump. No crying eyes here.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
40. You are free to behave however you wish, of course.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:03 PM
Jul 2019

I am free to comment on your behavior. This thread is my comment on the behavior of some DUers, who I have not named. I have also not linked to that thread.

As the teacher in "A Christmas Story" said when nobody would 'fess up about the tongue stuck to the pole, "They know their blame."

You're free to be whoever you are.

Stargazer09

(2,132 posts)
39. I agree
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:02 PM
Jul 2019

The wife and children look like victims of abuse. They do not deserve mockery or scorn.

Acosta, his father, and Pence are fair game. They look evil, and their actions support that assessment.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
45. In this case it's not all about the kids
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:06 PM
Jul 2019

I think making fun of the Stepford family photo is okay. It's not really just singling out the kids for scorn.

They look pretty scary though. I can see the one right next to her father torturing small animals.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
48. Please proceed. You are continuing the very process I'm objecting too.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:08 PM
Jul 2019

Think about what you write, please. People remember such things.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
145. I understand your disdain for my comments.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 10:28 PM
Jul 2019

I do understand your disapproval. I used to be in the same camp with you on the matter.

What I have come to believe is that these people are bred and nurtured to become the unfeeling, unethical, immoral, hypocritical, inhumane, sycophants that make up the right-wing. We see it in the way judges handle cases - with their statements about how the defendant was an Eagle Scout and has so much potential. They are "different" and "above" the rest of us. They believe they are the US aristocracy.

The right is not treating them like kids. The right is treating them like the little automatons they are hoping to produce. This is how they produce the next Brett Kavanaugh, the next Ginni Thomas, the next Stephen Miller, the next Kellyanne Conway.

So I no longer care that they are kids. They are weapons in the war on our Constitution and upon humanity.

If that means the right gets to treat the kids on the left as if they are the next Obama, the next Hillary, etc. then that is the price we pay. It is my fervent hope our kids will be the next Obama, the next RBG, the next humanitarian leaders. The right is going to tear them down and do that anyway. No matter what we say or do. They have defined the terms of the war. We can either admit that and respond, or we can concede.

It's not the "because they did it first" defense. It's the they did it first and are going to keep doing it until the bloody end offense.

Mike Nelson

(9,966 posts)
49. Generally...
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:08 PM
Jul 2019

… it's not okay at all... I know people mock Crooked Donald's children - and that's fine; they work for him and/or are spokespeople for him. The son is neither. I recall Bristol Palin was debated. She toured talk shows and declared herself the "Spokesperson for Abstinence" so she was fair game, in m opinion. Remember when Rush Limbaugh made a joke about a President's daughter and a dog? He was disgusting... it's not okay!

marble falls

(57,172 posts)
188. Donny Two Scoop's kids - Beavis, Butthead and Ivanka are part of the story by choice ...
Sun Aug 4, 2019, 09:59 AM
Aug 2019

and deserve the shit they get. Tiffany and Barron are not part of furthering the Trumpolini regime and deserve to be left alone.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
52. I mocked Pence in that pic
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:11 PM
Jul 2019

Mocking the kids seemed wrong. But mocking Pence seemed A-OK. On the other hand, I dislike the fact that Acosta staged the pic to make him look like a clean family man who couldn't possibly be hiding any dirty Epstein secrets.

PatrickforO

(14,586 posts)
56. I didn't see the thread on here, but I did see it on twitter.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:17 PM
Jul 2019

It was troubling. You can see a lot in photos if you silence your mind and just look. Those two children look pretty troubled to me.

But, yes, I agree with you about not ridiculing them - at all. We are better than that. We have to be.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
62. Has that not always been the policy of some posters here?
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:24 PM
Jul 2019

It’s okay to make fun of someone’s appearances, weight, height, orientation, race, children, or anything else... as long as they have the wrong political beliefs.

Turin_C3PO

(14,033 posts)
71. I will say
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:30 PM
Jul 2019

I think racism isn’t tolerated here, even if directed against Republicans. Nor should it be. But yeah, the other stuff seems to be tolerated to one degree or another if it involves rivals.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
76. There's usually two groups here on any such discussion
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:35 PM
Jul 2019

One that stands by their principles and doesn’t determine right and wrong based on who is the target, and another group who bases right and wrong strictly on party politics.

Turin_C3PO

(14,033 posts)
81. I try and stay grounded in the first group
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:38 PM
Jul 2019

although I’m sure I’ve failed at times and been part of the latter.

MustLoveBeagles

(11,632 posts)
63. Thank you MineralMan for calling this out
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:24 PM
Jul 2019

I don't like it when people pick on Barron either. It's not his fault his parents are asses. The girls didn't pick their father and aren't to blame for his sins. I didn't think the girls looked creepy at all but they did look miserable, as did their mother. I hope my comment in that thread didn't come across as mocking them. That wasn't my intention. I feel sorry for them.

Turin_C3PO

(14,033 posts)
66. No, not at all.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:26 PM
Jul 2019

But I tend to cut people a little slack because I think the craziness with Trump is causing some people to act out. It’s still wrong, though, I agree.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
93. When I was a child, I sometimes acted out inappropriately.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:04 PM
Jul 2019

When I did, I was instantly corrected by my parents, who told me why my behavior was unacceptable, but only after making me stop that behavior in no uncertain terms.

We're all adults here, and should have learned those lessons earlier in life, it seems to me.

mtngirl47

(990 posts)
67. Remember the lessons you learned as a child....
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:26 PM
Jul 2019

If you don't have anything nice to say....don't say anything at all.

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

or as Michele Obama says: When they go low, we go high.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
69. My take on that picture and that thread
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:28 PM
Jul 2019

is that a lot of people were concerned over how unhappy those children look. That isn't mocking. Also, people were commenting on the odd style of haircut and clothing. Again, not mocking. Teachers were commenting that they would take notice of a child who looked like that in their class.

So, maybe a few people said some things about "children of the corn" etc, but honestly, I didn't read it as mocking the children. Something doesn't look quite right in that photo or so many people wouldn't have thought it was photoshoped. Most people recognize that when kids appear odd or unhappy it's the parents who are held responsible.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
120. I agree, there is a very strange dynamic going on in that photograph, but it is not the fault
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:32 PM
Jul 2019

of the children. A lot of people just made the observation that something seems very "off" about the family, and that they do not look happy or comfortable with each other. It's just very strange, that's all. I don't think that amounts to making fun of the children. If anything, I feel very sorry for them.

Hekate

(90,779 posts)
70. Thanks MinMan. It quickly got tasteless and excessive.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:28 PM
Jul 2019

(Checks conscience to see if participated. Can't remember -- only that I agree the overall vibe was that of a very unhappy wife and kids. Not their fault how they look.)

tulipsandroses

(5,124 posts)
72. I agree- Minor children should be off limits
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:30 PM
Jul 2019

- Adult adult children are fair game if they are a part of the problem - Trump adult children - for example

Spouses - it depends - Some spouses - part of the problem too -Melania is fair game to me - She is a phony - She was part of the Birther conspiracy - Phony I care about the children - Lets be best - I went to the border once - wearing that stupid jacket. I am the most hated person. Poor me. She needs to be called out.

Barron - He should be off limits. He's not responsible for his parents being stupid and hateful.

Likewise -Acosta's children should be off limits. Don't know anything about his wife. If she hasn't said anything and done anything to deserve scorn and criticism then she should be off limits too.



Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
74. Says the man who refers to italian-american as "goombas"
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:32 PM
Jul 2019

Spare me the patronized post. Needing attention today?

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
107. Then you remember to whom I was referring, right?
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:51 PM
Jul 2019

Not a child. A very obnoxious adult, in fact. It was that guy, you know, who was Press Secretary for what, five minutes before getting fired for saying something really, really stupid. What was his name again? Anthony Scaramucci, right? Scaramouche from the Commedia dell'arte, right. Why, yes, I did mock him, as did almost everyone else.

You're off point in this thread by a long way. Not everything has to do with your pet complaint about me. See you next time.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
128. I guess we all have our 'reasons' for misbehaving at times, don't we?
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 06:14 PM
Jul 2019

Not pointing fingers myself ... cause I get it ... and you know I love ya man

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
75. Fine line between observing and mocking. The kids do look creepy and...
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:34 PM
Jul 2019

while it's not their fault they are presented that way, not mentioning it at all is perhaps asking a bit much.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
90. Those are my thoughts. It's the photo and the way the parents groomed & dressed the girls....
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:58 PM
Jul 2019

and all their similarities (the parents, too) to the family in The Shining, and the 2 girls @ the end of the hall, that the picture is alarming.

Children these days don't wear their hair like that. I had that haircut as a child....in the 1950s. I have no doubt at all that the girls are teased at school behind their backs for being dressed & groomed this way. It's not normal for the 21st Century.

But that's not mocking the children. In fact, someone needs to tell the parents that the way they're dressing and grooming them is inappropriate.

To add to the creepiness of the photo, Acosta looks similar to Jack Nicholson, and the wife has an eery resemblance to Shelley Duvall, who played the wife.

My post is #86.

hlthe2b

(102,343 posts)
77. That Acosta expressed no concern whatsoever for those little girls that Epstein all but "destroyed"
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:36 PM
Jul 2019

is what worries me about his own little girls. I won't mock them; I do fear their vacant looks in the photo to which you refer may reflect something that should concern us all. It is not automatic, after all, that parents will love their children when they show disregard for others.

Tech

(1,771 posts)
78. There are many duers who post their dismay with their family members who believe in trump.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:37 PM
Jul 2019

They are adults. I have seen more respect given to the adult believers in trump than have been given to these young girls.

The focus on their looks and what they are wearing is a sign of what our world has become. Maybe some of you were the cool ones who always wore the right clothes and had cool hair. I was not. I have photos of me as a child that make me cringe. I can laugh now, but they still make me cringe.

So excuse me, this week's posts are really bringing out the mama bear in me, but saying the type of things some have been saying is once again below what we are about and is bullying, even worse, bullying by adults to children. Those girls did not have a choice as to the circumstances they have been born into, no choice as to who their parents are. The last thing they probably wanted was to be at some weird signing with dad with all those creepy guys around.

Thanks for bringing it up. I was so angry when I read the posts that went with the pictures that I almost threw in the towel on humanity. If the people who supposedly believe as I do can be so cruel to kids, what can be done? This post reinforces that there are still good people.

 

Tipperary

(6,930 posts)
80. I am glad to see there are a lot of recs for this thread.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:37 PM
Jul 2019

Restores my faith somewhat, but that thread is horrible.

Last time I left du, it was the primaries that drove me off. But lately, I’ve just seen more an more of this.

About done with this site I think.

Turin_C3PO

(14,033 posts)
83. Yes. Unfortunately, this isn't new.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:41 PM
Jul 2019

We’ve gone through periods where homophobia and sexism were rampant with nothing being done about it. I like DU but it has its major problems.

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
85. The jury voted that this is acceptable.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:45 PM
Jul 2019

This entire post is a complaint aginst DUs alert and jury system.

It didn't go your way so you post this, in violation of the TOS regarding jury decisions.

The only comment in the op was "creepy". It does look like the twins from the Shining.

Lest we forget, Acosta allowed a pedophile off to continue his vile acts. Acosta has two daughters and did not give them a thought while he gave Epstein a pass.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
94. I neither alerted on that post, nor was I on any jury.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:11 PM
Jul 2019

I am commenting more on the replies to that thread. The OP, I believe was posted to generate that kind of comment, but it's not one I would alert on. Instead, I posted my objection in the thread.

This is not a post about DU's member-based moderation system, which I think works pretty well, overall. I rarely alert on any post, but I do serve on juries and always vote with the idea that people should post as they please, within some limits. As a juror, I keep in mind the goals of the administrators of this site, since I am just a guest here.

I know who Acosta is. I think he is thoroughly despicable. Frankly, however, I would never post a photo of his family on DU, since they are not involved in his actions, as far as I know.

You have chided me in your post, as you are free to do at any time. When you do, I will respond as I think best.

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
97. We rarely disagree.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:19 PM
Jul 2019

I did not know anything about his family or if he had one.
I believe posting a photo WE paid to have taken and is in the public record without any comment but creepy is not picking on the kids.

We will agree to disagree.

I care more about the victims than the enabler.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
109. In this case, the victims were someone's wife and two girl children,
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:54 PM
Jul 2019

and people here mocked their appearance. Like kids from the "Addams family," someone said.

Who did those people hurt? Nobody I know of.

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
110. I agree
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:03 PM
Jul 2019

Those comments should have been alerted on and in that case we agree. Over the line!

I am still pissed by the KGOP comments on Chelsea and Sasha and Malia.

 

Tipperary

(6,930 posts)
99. And many of us disagree with that thread.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:21 PM
Jul 2019

Look at the recs for this one.

What’s really sad ( and telling) is the way you and others are trying to rationalize the wrongness of mocking children.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
86. When I read your OP, I totally agreed. I didn't see the thread in GD. Then I saw the photo....
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:50 PM
Jul 2019

Then I saw the photo in this thread, in a Snopes.com link. I must say I was alarmed at the creepiness of it.

I don't know what other posters said, but I spotted right away what was wrong with the family picture. It is NOT the children or wife or Acosta themselves. It is the way the parents dressed the children and did their hair. And the way the wife is dressed and her expression. The fact that Acosta looks a bit like Jack Nicholson in that picture adds to the overall creepy effect.

Like I say, I don't know what other posters said, but they have a look that reminds me of characters in the movie The Shining. The two girl twins at the end of the hall, the haircut of the son, Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall. It's not a comment on the children themselves, but the way the adults made them up.

Acosta looks similar to Nicholson. His wife looks similar to Shelley Duvall. And the little girls have a haircut similar to the son in The Shining, while also having a similarity to the twin girls at the end of the hall.

So it's not making fun of the children, really, if that's what the posters were talking about. BTW, I had a haircut just like that when I was a child....in the 1950s! Someone really needs to tell the Acosta parents something about how to groom and dress their children. This is just not normal. It really isn't.

But I agree that making fun of children is off limits. I don't regard my comments as doing that. Their children are probably teased behind their backs at school for the way their parents make them dress and cut their hair.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
102. I live in an neighborhood with a very diverse population.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:28 PM
Jul 2019

Because of that, I see children from many backgrounds as they make their way to school. I see children dressed in traditional Hmong costumes. I see girls wearing various levels of Islamic attire. I see children from a fundamentalist family on my block, dressed in prairie dresses that cover them completely for modesty reasons. I also see typical kids in whatever clothing is sold at Target or Walmart.

Now, I don't know how all those children are treated at their schools or by other children, but I remember how anyone who dressed differently was treated when I was a child in school. I expect things are much the same today.

Schoolchildren are dressed as their parents wish in many cases - not as they choose for themselves. I remember seeing children, right through high school, who were mocked for their clothing, hair and other appearance differences. I remember seeing how they felt about that. Some of them were friends of mine. From time to time, but not as often as I should have, I stood up for them and called out the bullies who mocked them.

Maybe I'm still doing the same thing, but I no longer have to worry about people not liking my criticisms of their boorish behavior.

I do not laugh at people who look different. I do not call attention to it, either. I find such behavior to be rude.

I'm sorry if you are offended by my comments, but I do not regret those comments. I deliberately did not mention any screen names in my post, nor did I call anyone out in that other thread. I only posted a general objection to what was going on.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
124. Oh, I'm not offended at all.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 05:52 PM
Jul 2019

I was all set to agree with you...until I saw the photo. I didn't see the other comments in that other thread, so I don't know about those. But I had a reaction to the photo and the entirety of what was depicted. A photo gives an overall impression.

So it was really about the impression of the whole family, in the way they are depicted in that photo, being creepy and similar to The Shining. That was my impression, w/o seeing anyone else's. Now I've seen in this thread that many others noticed the same thing. So it wasn't mocking or making fun of the children, in my view. Remarking on the impression of a photo, or the resemblance of a family to a horror movie family (when that resemblance, based on dress & hair & expressions), is fair game, I think.

As for the way the children are dressed and groomed, it's not based on a religion or culture. It's just .... odd. My mind thinks...what is in the head of the mother who dresses and grooms her children that way? It's pretty weird.

This is very different from, say, when Rush Limbaugh called Chelsey Clinton a pig. Or someone made a derogatory crack about Baron Trump...I forget what it was. I am totally against bringing children into the harsh political world, or openly criticizing their appearance or anything about them. This is an exception, though, I think...because it's the photo and the whole family. Not what the girls' features look like (they are cute, actually...and I like the color & type of hair they have).

IcyPeas

(21,901 posts)
87. mine was post # 19
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 02:51 PM
Jul 2019

Thank you.

I was the first to point out that this was disgusting.

And you know, I was afraid that when I hit the send button I was going to get flamed. Thankfully some people responded in agreement.

imagine you are little girls going to daddy's new office. a big important government office. probably lots of people in the room. I'd have been a nervous little wreck if it was me at that age.

imagine this thread being picked up by "another" site..... what will they say about us?

imagine these girls go to school Monday morning and some other kid or kids have seen this picture or this story and the little girls get bullied. I couldn't live with that.

imagine all the little girls (and boys) who have been sexually abused and don't come forward for fear of being mocked. and then we have a president that demeans an alleged rape victim saying "she's not my type", or saying "she's a 3".

I hate Alex Acosta. I hate Donald Trump. Acosta is proposing an 80% funding cut for the government agency that combats child sex trafficking. He is a prick.

It saddens me that some DUers think this is okay to make fun of his children. As I read down the thread it really saddened me.

peace



Texin

(2,597 posts)
92. While I agree with most of your opinon, MineralMan.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:00 PM
Jul 2019

However, where I respectfully disagree though, is with the notion that a spouse of a despicable tRump repub is somehow exempt from scorn. If indeed the spouse is in disagreement with his or her wife or husband, and is 'suffering' silently they should be off limits, but how is anyone to determine whether they are or aren't in full agreement with every despicable deed and utterance when they remain silent to them? A spouse that despises what their significant other does and says has the ability to publicly state otherwise, much as George Conway has done (if we are to believe that this isn't simply a case of the old "good cop/bad cop" routine). People have the means to not only speak out, but to remove themselves from their offenders -- even if that means a good old fashion divorce. We ARE who we associate with and that includes spouses as well as other relatives, friends and neighbors. I would not stay with a husband exhibiting such vicious and dangerous behaviors as many of these hell bound deplorables. Frankly, I wouldn't have dated or married such a person. Beliefs and behaviors simply don't just lie dormant until some vile Svengali waves his magic wand and wakens them from their bland conformity and turns them into full blown raging anger and hate balls. Of course, children -- I will define "children" as those not having reached adult status and/or public figures whose loathsomeness is not full display for everyone to take the measure of the characters -- should be off limits.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
95. I don't know about you, but I have never heard of Acosta's wife.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:17 PM
Jul 2019

As far as I know she has no public presence. So, I consider her to be off-limits for criticism. I don't know anything about her relationship with Acosta at all. For all I know, she is a victim of his.

In my opinion, that photo should not be in distribution on the Internet, much less exposed enough to have a Snopes article verifying its validity. It's not just DU. That photo has been distributed widely. I find that disturbing.

I certainly would not spread it any further, nor comment on it in any way that had anything to do with the family. Really, I wouldn't comment on it at all, since I see it as immaterial to any discussion of Acosta.

My comments here are about how it was discussed on DU. Period.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
98. Some us are really just so wound up and pissed off that we're not acting like ourselves ...
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:20 PM
Jul 2019

I proffer my mea culpa on this account. Not fair to poke fun at the kid (and honestly the youngest one looks quite adorable in the pic). But the overall vibe of that pic IS CREEPY, I don't care who you are, if you've seen 'The Shining', it just ... IS.

Comments (optimally) should've been limited to the overall odd look of the photo, I agree, logically.

But I think there's an awful lot of us just so disgusted with w/Trump in general, and Acosta in particular ... that that particular pic coming out at that time was just TOO ripe for derision. Pretty sure the original thread was before Acosta resigned as well.

But you're right, we SHOULD do better. Not 'Be Best', of course, but do better

Duppers

(28,125 posts)
101. The parents are responsible for the appearance
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:25 PM
Jul 2019

Of those poor girls. I didn't post but shared the attitude that judging by their appearance, those girls are and have been psychologically abused. That was my understanding of the whole point of the "mockery." It was not to attack the girls themselves but rather their abusive parents.



cstanleytech

(26,318 posts)
104. Spouses? That's going to depend upon their own actions and the same
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 03:36 PM
Jul 2019

goes for their children assuming of course they are adult children we are talking about.

 

tonedevil

(3,022 posts)
111. I agree...
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:03 PM
Jul 2019

Mocking children is just mean spirited and not at all a good look. That said, I am struggling to look at this picture and not think Wow that is a total creep show and I don't believe many others can either.

oldsoftie

(12,587 posts)
113. Thank you for posting this. I see a lot of hypocrisy on a few issues here
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:09 PM
Jul 2019

But point it out and you likely get a hide from a sanctimonious jury. Especially regarding race

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
114. I am not one of those....
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:12 PM
Jul 2019

.... who are mocking these children. I do have a question however. When you see two children who are clearly of different ages dressed exactly the same with the exact same haircuts as though they were twins, who would not think that odd? I believe that making fun of these two girls is a detestable act. I do however believe it is quite reasonable to question the judgement of parents who would purposely put their children in a position that invites those detestable comments which you are speaking of, and though it may not be by design, make no mistake about it. It is an invitation for ridicule.

Ms. Toad

(34,086 posts)
161. It used to be pretty standard.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:05 PM
Jul 2019

I grew up being dressed identically to my youngest sibling - especially on special occasions. The fancy dresses were the ones most likely to be identical. I don't see it so much now, but two days ago I ran into mom and daughter with identical dresses.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
175. Did you and your sibling....
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 02:55 PM
Jul 2019

.... or the mother and daughter you ran into two days ago also have identical haircuts? I think I will actually stand by the words I used in my post. Special occasions and a mother and daughter being cute is is a little different then what is observed in this particular photo. Can I assume that you and your siblings hairstyle was not identical, and that the identical mode of dress did not last any longer than the special occasion? Let me be clear, I am not in any way shape or form making fun of or ridiculing these children simply because it is a despicable thing to do. I do however believe that these parents through norms not present in most people have set their children up to invite ridicule from those unethical people who find a twisted amusement in doing so.

Ms. Toad

(34,086 posts)
177. Pretty much identical haircuts, at that age.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 04:09 PM
Jul 2019

Her hair had waves, mine didn't, so identical cuts on her hair and mine didn't look identical. I didn't notice the mother-daughter's hairstyle.

As to special occasions - do you consider weekly church attendance a special occasion? We had several matching outfits between when my sister was adopted at age 2, and I turned 12 and was able to control my own clothing purchases. It had nothing to do with being cute. It was purely practical. We wore them on occasions when we needed something that was guaranteed not to have holes or stains, since we were farm kids and holes/stains were pretty much par for the course. Family gatherings, photo ops, church, etc. Because we had very little money, my mother made our dressier clothing. She didn't particularly like to sew, but did so out of economic necessity. It was far easier for her to just sew two of the same thing. The mother-daughter were in an airport. I have no idea whehter they wore the outfit regularly or not.

And - if special occasions are OK, in your book, what do you think this occasion was for the Acosta family. Routine occurrence, or special occasion?

It is less common now - but Acosta is from a generation when it was extremely common.

Finally, even if you believe it is an invitation to ridicule, we ought not to be engaging in ridculing children.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
179. Ok.....
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 07:28 PM
Jul 2019

It seems you and I have a different outlook on this particular issue. That's okay, and I think I'll leave it at that. One thing though.


"Finally, even if you believe it is an invitation to ridicule, we ought not to be engaging in ridculing children."

A rather unnecessary statement since neither of us in our entire conversation has engaged in any of that.

Ms. Toad

(34,086 posts)
180. You suggested parents were setting "their children up to invite ridicule"
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 08:46 PM
Jul 2019

This entire thread is a response to people ridiculing the two girls. You expressly suggested that they were set up for ridicule. So - in connection with the premise of this thread - even if they were, it is not appropriate to respond with riducule.

Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #180)

Ms. Toad

(34,086 posts)
186. I didn't say you did ridicule those children.
Mon Jul 15, 2019, 04:38 PM
Jul 2019

I said that you stated they were being set up for ridicule.

The entire thread is about whether it is appropriate to ridicule children. In that context (as I have now explained twice), I obseved - relevant to the topic of the thread (and the reality that members of DU ARE ridiculing the children), that even if the parents are setting them up for ridicule, it is not appropriate to respond with ridicule.

Your reaction is completely out of proportion to my comments which did not, in any post, attack you or accuse you of ridiculing children.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
116. Thank you for posting this I totally agree.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:15 PM
Jul 2019

A few months ago there was a nasty thread about Baron and I thought it was horrible. The children (minors) and spouses of people in office should be off limits (other than Trump's adult family who are helping ruin our country).

I saw that post and blocked it right away. We have to be better than that.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
118. Yes. Republicans mocked Chelsea Clinton and the Obama daughters.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:27 PM
Jul 2019

I recall Chelsea was called the White House dog
and it was said the Obama daughters (about 7 and 10 at the time) dessed like cheap street hookers.

JDC

(10,131 posts)
119. I made a comment on the original thread...I think
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:31 PM
Jul 2019

My thoughts around the photo had nothing to do with Acosta or the fact that he is a republican.

I liken the photo to those on the funny family photo websites that we all have looked at, laughed at and enjoy. Bad Xmas sweater matching, or funny themes of the times that so clearly did not stand the test of time; Those that show a family member is clearly not happy to be there etc, etc.

Mostly because we all have family photos that we look back on and cringe a bit. Nothing more and no malicious intent.

I agree with your commentary on kids being off limits, but not all of us have anger and venom in our hearts when we post. I come here to increase my awareness however, so this is one of those times that makes me think and will make me think next time. Thanks.

kozar

(2,126 posts)
121. I feel MM,
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 04:33 PM
Jul 2019

"But, are those people's spouses and children fair game for our mockery and disgust? I do not think so. What horrible thing has some young child done that is worthy of such name-calling and ugly jokes about their appearance?"


That as the father of a challenged adult, I have free rein to feel and disrespect his children since he made fun what seems like decades ago of a handicapped reporter. My daughter did nothing to him ,but saw it on news and understands such things, her friends,and the people I served when I worked in the filed of challenged adults before retirement did nothing either.

He slandered a whole group,,thousands of that group are children,, I feel I can disrespect him,and frankly,anyone who "respects" him.

Other than that,I could agree with your points,

Koz

lostnfound

(16,189 posts)
123. It made me uncomfortable too.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 05:25 PM
Jul 2019

I think that part of the reaction to it had to do more with an interpretation of an unhappy emotional state perhaps brought on by a stifling, selfish or abusive head of household.

That’s already shaky ground, as reading a lot into a kid’s expression is unfair or presumptuous.

But some of the comments were even worse than that.

Lucid Dreamer

(584 posts)
131. Mocking unjustified!
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 07:09 PM
Jul 2019

MM> What horrible thing has some young child done that is worthy of such name-calling and ugly jokes about their appearance?

I think there are at least 2 different reasons for those despicable disgusting mocking posts:

1: Some people are spring loaded to insulting everybody they disagree with, mainly just picking fights in an obnoxious manner.
2: Others pile on like it is a facebook challenge, no reason except to add to their collection of likes and responses.

Their reputations should be appropriately sullied.

Such behavior does nothing to further the real goal we all share: Victory

kacekwl

(7,021 posts)
134. Maybe you haven't heard
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 08:25 PM
Jul 2019

Everything now is ok. Everything. President committing crimes, pulling kids from the parrents, locking up people in concentration camps, having sex with minors, taking sides with murderous dictators over America policy, ........ But those here and in the Democratic party should watch their toungs, mind their manners and apologize at every opportunity.

Iggo

(47,564 posts)
156. I don't want them to apologize for making fun of children.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 11:05 AM
Jul 2019

I want them to not make fun of children.

Fuck apologies. Just don't do it.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
136. Caging children and mocking children
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 08:46 PM
Jul 2019

Are just different points on the spectrum.

And requires the same type of mindset.

It's a way of dehumanizing those whom you disagree.

LuckyCharms

(17,455 posts)
141. There are several reasons I stayed out of that picture thread.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 09:14 PM
Jul 2019

1) They are indeed children, and I'm sure they had nothing to do with what their father did with regard to Epstein. Zero. Nothing. The girls are innocent.

2) The internet is forever. I would not want to contribute to the girls having problems as they get older (or perhaps even now) when they view comments about their perceived appearances. I'm sure that we all have cringey childhood pictures of ourselves. In this case, maybe it's just an awkward pic...who knows.

3) There is a chance, perhaps a good chance, that these young girls grow up to be progressive warriors. But regardless of how they end up in life, they are still just children who happen to have a father that did something shitty.

4) Besides the obvious reasons for keeping children off limits...please remember this...they had absolutely no control over their father, they probably have close to NO understanding of what he did, and they certainly have no control over an awkward photo.

My comments are not addressed to the OP. I am essentially agreeing with the OP.

Initech

(100,100 posts)
146. If they are of high school age or less, absolutely no.
Sat Jul 13, 2019, 10:31 PM
Jul 2019

If they are of the age that say, DTJ and Eric Trump are, anything goes.

Iggo

(47,564 posts)
154. Junior, Eric, and Ivanka aren't children. The OP is talking about children.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 09:42 AM
Jul 2019

The Trump spawn, save one, are all adults.

And good people leave the other one alone, because he's a child.

TexasBlueDog

(43 posts)
149. It's cool...
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 03:24 AM
Jul 2019

We didn't have much to say about AOC followers issuing death threats against an 8 year old that made fun of her on youtube. I kept waiting for AOC to blister those jerks and maybe even an apology...silence. Do we really hate that much?

 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
150. If they are using their children as props? Yes.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 03:48 AM
Jul 2019

Hideously dressed. Horribly unhappy props.

Yes. That fully deserves mocking.

And they are not going to read DU anyway so stop trying to shame us.

cstanleytech

(26,318 posts)
152. Hardly fair to mock actual children as children have almost no legal say so in such a situation.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 08:15 AM
Jul 2019

Now adult children on the other had do have the ability to refuse however if they decide to go along with supporting their parent then they open themselves up just like any other adult.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
151. Two points
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 04:06 AM
Jul 2019

1) It was an official photo that they chose to include their children in. They chose which one of several shots to include on their website.

2) My take on the strange expressions on the children's faces was a reflection not on the children but the father who seemed to have a terrorizing effect on his children.

It may be a one off thing and he didn't prepare them for it or it maybe how they are with him in general.

It does show that the father is completely detached from his own children and I don't expect hom to be more concerned about other children.


If someone intends to use their children as props in an official photo then analyzing the photo is perfectly fine, ridiculing the children obviously not.

Frankly I think it shows that they are likely victims of dysfunctional parents.

sagesnow

(2,824 posts)
158. You are wasting your time arguing with
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 11:31 AM
Jul 2019

Russian Bot-worker trolls. The thread mocking Epstein's children and wife should have been locked, but you are fighting an army of Russian Bot-worker trolls.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
162. Well, I think the admins of this site are determined to let the
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:17 PM
Jul 2019

members of the site moderate it. Once they put community moderation into effect and fine-tuned it a few times, that was basically it. Anyone can alert on a post that they feel doesn't meet community standards. There are some rules and reasons to alert on something, but it's up to the random people called to a jury to decide.

How they decide is really a crapshoot, so posts that I think should be hidden are not and posts I think should stand are hidden. But, it's not my website, so it's not my decision, even if I am on a jury. I get one vote, just like everyone else.

Now, does that lead to some things staying visible that probably should not? Sometimes it does - in my opinion, of course.

And that's the point, really. We're all moderators on DU, if we're willing to be. A typical day for me on DU will involve as many as three jury sessions. Rarely is it more than that. About 90% of the time, I vote to leave the post. Why? Because I think people should be able to post their opinions, even if I disagree with those opinions. If I object to something someone posts, I can express that objection.

But, I have to do that carefully, because I'm also subject to having my post get an alert and go to a jury. Right now, I have one post hidden in the past 90 days. I know why it was hidden. I wrote a little too quickly and a little too sharply in response to something. I try to learn from such things, but they happen very rarely any more.

DU is what it is. The owners and administrators take a more or less hands-off approach to the site, and let the members of the site manage who goes and who stays, based on what they post. It's more or less a democratic approach. Does it work? Yes, it does. Is it perfect? Nope, because no human endeavor is perfect.

Anyhow, that's my analysis of how the admins of DU think about all this. I could be wrong. I've never met any of them.

ck4829

(35,085 posts)
160. It's unfortunately pragmatism in action
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:03 PM
Jul 2019

Taking the high road will get us the same thing having more votes got us in the 2016 election.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
164. Perhaps. Perhaps not.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:24 PM
Jul 2019

Actually, there's no real evidence to support what you're saying, really. We don't really know exactly. There are lots of theories, though, including the one that says Democrats are too nice for their own good. Is that right? I don't know.

Frankly, though, all we have to do to win in 2020 is to turn out to vote and bring as many other like-minded people to the polls as possible. If we do that, and vote for Democrats across the board, we'll regain political power. If we do not do that, we will not win.

So, I might disagree with you about something or another, but if you vote in every election for Democrats, then we are on the same side, overall. I don't agree 100% with any other person on this planet, I'm sure, and they all disagree with me on some point. It doesn't matter. It all averages out, if we are on the side that wants everyone to benefit from policies.

I take the road my conscience leads me down. It's pretty simple, really. I can do nothing else, frankly.

Polly Hennessey

(6,801 posts)
176. Remember, Mineral Man
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 03:13 PM
Jul 2019

those sentiments apply to all of us. I also take the road my conscience leads me down. You may not agree with it but it is where I find my truth. The word creepy still stands.

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
165. I agree that children and families should be off limts.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:29 PM
Jul 2019

The exception being, of course, when those children are plenty old enough to inject themselves into the fray and have clearly demonstrated that they are every bit as repugnant as their parent, just like Don Jackass Jr has done.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
167. If they are old enough to do that, they are adults, not children.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:37 PM
Jul 2019

I am talking about children. Minors.

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
178. Well, I would event extend that to include non-political adults as well.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 06:15 PM
Jul 2019

After all, we don't get to pick who we're related to. Just imagine, for example, if a politician had a disabled or neurologically impaired relative. No matter what their politics, you know there would be vicious, puerile yahoos on both sides who would openly mock that person's disability because they dislike the politics of their relative.

I just wish people would stop this already. I'd rather win having logic and a good argument on my side than a photoshopped pic, a childish meme, and a pack of tittering idiots in tow. It's pathetic what American politics and political discourse has been reduced to.

Mc Mike

(9,115 posts)
166. We can be rude to them after they turn out to be horrible little chips off the block.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:36 PM
Jul 2019

Like Ben Quayle, or Neil Gorsuch, or the first 3 Rumpf kids.

Mc Mike

(9,115 posts)
169. That wasn't posted in disagreement with your op, Min.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 12:41 PM
Jul 2019

Just saying there's always time to attack them after they go bad.

The daughter of repug operative Tom Hofeller helped this country, she wasn't with her dad's side, and I'm glad we didn't attack her as a kid for being his daughter.

Kaleva

(36,333 posts)
182. Minors and adult children who are not very publicly political are off limits to me.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 09:11 PM
Jul 2019

I don't begrudge an adult child who attends political events for a parent. One would expect family members to attend a convention, rally, speech, or fundraiser. Examaples of an adult child who is far game is Don Jr., Ivanka, and Eric Trump.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
184. Depends on the person. Really.
Mon Jul 15, 2019, 09:58 AM
Jul 2019

Something OK by one person may or may not be OK by another. I thought people knew that. Fine. You didn't, now you do (or can).

I think staring at little kids and judging their clothes is creepy as hell, others don't. I thought we could do better. Much better.

But I guess the important thing is that our self-righteousness is advertised as a social absolute... as it covers up our own sins so much more effectively.

marble falls

(57,172 posts)
187. I agree with you. Acosta is fair game, he voluntarily became part of the sordid story, Ms Acosta ...
Sun Aug 4, 2019, 09:54 AM
Aug 2019

and her daughters did not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, Is Mocking Children O...