General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Send her back" is meant as a deterrent to all women
...What made Send her back such a horrifying chant was not how specific it was but how generic...It was that, at President Trumps rally this week, we saw the dramatic unveiling of a castigation that could now be used against any woman not behaving as she should
...Send who? Send her
Send her back is the granddaughter of Lock her up,
Lock her up seemed to be about that woman and that incident, at that moment in time...
...But then the chant resurfaced, and it wasnt in reference to Clinton. It was in reference to Christine Blasey Ford
At another rally a week later, the chant morphed into an attack on Sen. Dianne Feinstein
...Lock up who? Lock up her
...The her had become fungible. Any woman could become a woman who should be locked up; it required only running afoul of what Trump thought she should be doing
...Its meant as a deterrent to all women...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/what-do-lock-her-up-and-send-her-back-have-in-common-its-pretty-obvious/2019/07/19/74bc4790-a999-11e9-9214-246e594de5d5_story.html?hpid&utm_term=.452de52a35dd
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/7/21/1873285/-Abbreviated-Pundit-Round-up-I-wish-the-only-race-we-worried-about-was-the-space-race#comment_74475477
58Sunliner
(4,390 posts)Is it coincidence that Putrid made statements about western democracy failing as a multi-racial state? Funny that he needed to try to manipulate and promulgate racism here in the states and elsewhere. That fucker needs to fall out of a helicopter.
MuseRider
(34,112 posts)we are not going anywhere.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)The phrase "send her back" is sexist and will be applied to all women at some point.
No one says "send him back."
pattyloutwo
(279 posts)Thank you for posting it. Misogynistic and scary. (Handmaids Tale came to mind.) Good for us to call out what it is for others who dont see it.
Duppers
(28,125 posts)Always has been.
Hekate
(90,766 posts)Of course it is racist. Of course it is white nationalist. But anyone who fails to see that Trump is once again attacking all women who dare to open their mouths -- has just not been paying attention.
He has put these particular women at high risk of injury and even death. As Congresswomen, they have no protection aside from local law enforcement. But he did that to Hillary Clinton as well. (She had protection, thank God -- but then, so did Bobby Kennedy.) And Stormy Daniels and her baby had no protection when Trump sent a thug to warn her off from opening her mouth.
The common denominator is not race: it is femaleness and speaking out.