General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums**FAUX NEWS REPORT*** Gowdy: "...Mueller gave democrats evidence.." !!!!!!!
Gowdy just said Mueller gave dems ammunition about collusion and OoJ
Gowdy said basically dems don't have to have a solid crime to impeach and the goal doesn't have to be BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT!!
That's the phrase, I forget things easy when I'm excited ... but basically their faces went bent when Gowdy said that.
Also
FAUX New pundints are talking about dems ending everything about the investigations and there should be no more.
They're indicating Mueller hearing should be THE open and closed of the matter because Mueller is old and not as fast talking as those who are talking over him.
They still don't understand OoJ is a paper case against Red Don ... he was on film saying he fired Comey in part because of the Russia Investigation !!!
Now Wallace is talking about law being the end start to impeachment again .... and it's NOT !!!
THEY ARE SCARED OF IMPEACHMENT !!!!
After looking at FAUX News today I'd bet GOOD MONEY they do ... NOT ... want impeachment proceedings especially during the election season !!!
More to come
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,836 posts)zaj
(3,433 posts)maxsolomon
(33,400 posts)Can you edit for clarity?
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... told earlier that Red Don welcomed it.
They ... DO NOT ...want more investigations
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... all the commentary has been how much Red Don would welcome impeachment where these guys are sKeered shitless of it.
SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)You don't even need a CRIME to commit Obstruction--which is in itself a crime.
Lying or doing anything to impede an investigation is obstruction. It assumes that there actually WAS a crime and that you may be found guilty.
That's what so many of us have been saying for nearly three years now: If Trump is so innocent, why not just let the investigation proceed? It'll just exonerate you, right...?
pecosbob
(7,543 posts)who should know more than he and his brethren about not needing actual proof (or anything else beside conspiracy nonsense) to launch an impeachment.