Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox News Legal Analyst Torches Trump For Unleashing 'Torrent Of Hatred'
https://www.yahoo.com/news/andrew-napolitano-donald-trump-092821963.htmlFox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano has accused President Donald Trump of unleashing a torrent of hatred with his attacks on four Democratic congresswomen of color. In an op-ed published Thursday, Napolitano also said ... government workers take an oath to support the Constitution, which itself not only commands of government both racial neutrality and color blindness, it generally prohibits government officials from making distinctions among people on the basis of immutable characteristics.
So, when the president defies these moral and constitutional norms and tells women of color to Go back, he raises a terrifying specter. The specter is hatred not for ideas he despises but for the people who embrace those ideas. The specter is also a dog whistle to groups around the country that hatred is back in fashion and is acceptable to articulate publicly. Hatred must be rejected loudly in all its forms especially when it comes from the president, Napolitano added.
"Go back" is a rejection of the nation as a melting pot; a condemnation of one of America's founding values E Pluribus Unum (Out of many, one). It implicates a racial or nativist superiority: We were here before you; this is our land, not yours; get out. Nativist hatred is an implication of moral or even legal superiority that has no constitutional justification in American government.
When the hate speech comes from a shameless president, we have a problem. The problem is that presidential hatred produces division among people and destroys peaceful dialogue. When thousands of people at a Trump rally in North Carolina recently chanted, "Send her back" referring to a congresswoman born in Somalia and Trump tweeted that the four congresswomen (including three born in the U.S.) should "Go back" to where they came from the inescapable image was of a president trying to divide rather than unite.
This business of the hatred of people is so dangerous because to some, as Lord Byron wrote, hatred is perversely pleasing. It gives them shelter in a mob, it lets them hurl venom with anonymity, and it regenerates itself. It must be rejected loudly in all its forms especially when it comes from the president.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 2558 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (62)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox News Legal Analyst Torches Trump For Unleashing 'Torrent Of Hatred' (Original Post)
left-of-center2012
Jul 2019
OP
Anything that comes out of the fux network is only a way to boost eyeballs and ratings
erronis
Jul 2019
#1
Agree, but wonder, Murdock was said to have cringed over dotard's last rally and send them back
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#2
Better than nothing. Can they care about guns, violence and immigration,too??
lindysalsagal
Jul 2019
#10
erronis
(15,355 posts)1. Anything that comes out of the fux network is only a way to boost eyeballs and ratings
I don't trust anybody or anything that spews from their mouths.
If they have a couple of seemingly moderate voices, it is only to increase the frothiness of their sheep.
Correct me if I'm wrong. I only see their blathering in airport lounges where I can't get up and turn off the noise.
Thekaspervote
(32,797 posts)2. Agree, but wonder, Murdock was said to have cringed over dotard's last rally and send them back
Chant. Said it went too far. Has ol rupert had enough?
BigmanPigman
(51,635 posts)6. Maybe his family has had to speak with him.
Aren't his sons less asinine?
SCantiGOP
(13,874 posts)7. I've read
that the sons are center to left politically.
BigmanPigman
(51,635 posts)9. That's a plus anyway.
I still can't figure out why Jerry Hall married him.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)3. Napolitano has been fairly tough on Trump
in regards to a lot of his legal issues - especially considering he's on Fox News
FredSanderson
(27 posts)4. Keep the hate speech legal though, America. What could go wrong?
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,447 posts)5. did Napolitano not notice candidate trump's speech about Mexicans?
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)8. Oh Andrew,
Do we need to go through the archives to show your complicity in putting the bigot in the White House?
You had all the info but decided to call it fake!
I am liking Shep more though.
lindysalsagal
(20,733 posts)10. Better than nothing. Can they care about guns, violence and immigration,too??
Prolly not.