Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Thu Aug 8, 2019, 05:39 PM Aug 2019

Impeachment questions

Suppose the House found evidence, voted by the majority,, and sent it to the Senate.

Is the Senate obligated to take it up?

If the Senate takes it up and finds Drumpf not guilty does this make him immune to future prosecution as a citizen on the charges?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Impeachment questions (Original Post) SHRED Aug 2019 OP
Yes and No, respectively COLGATE4 Aug 2019 #1
There is no constitutional requirement for the Senate to take it up StarfishSaver Aug 2019 #2
If McConnell wants the least worst optics Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #3
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
2. There is no constitutional requirement for the Senate to take it up
Thu Aug 8, 2019, 05:59 PM
Aug 2019

But current Senate rules require it.

However, what constitutes "taking it up" is also totally up to the Senate, so they could conceivably do pretty much next to nothing.

Nothing the Senate does - whether they convict or acquit - has any legal bearing on whether he's prosecuted after leaving office.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,416 posts)
3. If McConnell wants the least worst optics
Thu Aug 8, 2019, 06:10 PM
Aug 2019

He'll hold the trial and vote not to convict rather quickly- I mean, assuming it's easy enough for them to do that and get away with it. If the House Impeaches with some fairly serious charges and the Senate begins to hear the evidence, who knows for sure, but the ultimate probability is that the Senate won't vote to convict and the matter will be "settled". Trump and Republicans will claim vindication of Trump and we will decry the fact that Trump will have gotten away with it but we will be pushed by the GOP and the MSM to "move on"- but at the very least, Trump will have the black mark of Impeachment hanging over him for the rest of his days and, hopefully, it will weaken him in terms of 2020. Even if the Senate fails to convict, there will have been lots of damning evidence presented in the House and Senate about his malfeasance.

McConnell could take the path of not doing anything about holding a trial or slow-walking it to the point that it doesn't happen. That would IMHO arguably look worse for Trump/GOP because, depending on the seriousness of the Impeachment charges in the House, it could definitely come across as stonewalling and cover up to most people (who would be correct in that belief). Plus, the longer it drags out, the closer it gets to the 2020 Election, which could harm Trump and the GOP more in the 2020 Election.

I honestly don't know exactly how they would play it and there are probably other things here I may not be considering.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Impeachment questions