Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Sotomayor Issues Scathing Dissent to Supreme Court's Asylum Rule Decision...
Justice Sotomayor Issues Scathing Dissent to Supreme Court's Asylum Rule Decision: The Stakes 'Could Not Be Higher'
By Christina Zhao On 9/12/19 at 12:15 AM EDT
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent issued Wednesday after the Supreme Court approved President Donald Trump's request to allow his administration to enforce its new aggressive asylum rules.
The new asylum rules first unveiled by the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security in July is expected to considerably reduce the number of asylum seekers in the U.S. from Central America. It will also make those who pass through another country before arriving in the U.S. ineligible for asylum, unless they were denied asylum in the country they were passing through first. Victims of trafficking are also exempt.
Out of the four liberal justices sitting on the Supreme Court, Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg were the only judges to dissent.
"Once again the Executive Branch has issued a rule that seeks to upend longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution," Sotomayor wrote in her dissenting opinion. "Although this Nation has long kept its doors open to refugees and although the stakes for asylum seekers could not be higher the Government implemented its rule without first providing the public notice and inviting the public input generally required by law."
Sotomayor also slammed the Trump administration for requesting the Supreme Court to allow the rule when lower courts ruled against the move. "Unfortunately, it appears the Government has treated this exceptional mechanism as a new normal," she wrote. "Historically, the Government has made this kind of request rarely; now it does so reflexively."
more...
https://www.newsweek.com/justice-sotomayor-issues-scathing-dissent-supreme-courts-asylum-rule-decision-stakes-could-not-1458866?fbclid=IwAR0ckupw1ckwNbCuZC6Aiov48D1T3rEJcCPHcb_Yv5Yemu071aEcOy6Qnqs
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1123 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (26)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Sotomayor Issues Scathing Dissent to Supreme Court's Asylum Rule Decision... (Original Post)
babylonsister
Sep 2019
OP
lark
(23,155 posts)1. Kagan is extremely far from being a liberal.
She's a moderate at best, it's just the rw fascists pretending to be SCOTUS make her look liberal in comparison.
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hugin
(33,198 posts)3. I'm curious about what sort of proof is required that a refugee sought asylum in a country they...
passed through?
George Soros should print up a few million documents they can hand out to the caravans with a big NO! on them.
Seriously.