General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Christian homeless shelter is getting $100k in damages after they turned away a trans woman
A homeless shelter that turned away a transgender woman will be getting $100,000 in a settlement from the city. They say their religious freedom was violated when the city investigated them for turning away a transgender woman.
The Downtown Hope Center in Anchorage, Alaska, turned away a transgender woman last year, citing their religious beliefs. The center argues that its Christian, so it can turn away people who dont live up to their religious principles.
The trans woman filed a complaint with the Anchorage Equal Rights Commission. While the state does not ban discrimination against LGBTQ people, the city of Anchorage has a civil rights ordinance that bans sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in public accommodations.
---snip---
Earlier this year, the Department of Housing and Urban Development rolled back Obama era protections for LGBTQ homeless people that required that shelters that receive federal money house transgender people with their gender, not with their sex assigned at birth or completely turned away.
more...
Just another reminder that the GLBT community is under attack.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)Do they have a moral purity test for all the homeless?
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)Unbelievable
(84 posts)to champion belief over action , it will always produce these negative results.
oasis
(49,389 posts)Mariana
(14,858 posts)The Christian homeless shelter is receiving $100,000 from the city of Anchorage.
oasis
(49,389 posts)TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)Demovictory9
(32,457 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)lpbk2713
(42,759 posts)The service following this episode probably had enough hypocrisy in it to make most people puke.
stopdiggin
(11,316 posts)(I don't know about this specific case, speaking in general)
but the government (any government) should not be "partnering" with religious organizations. No funding. No special privilege. No "joint" programs or agenda. No steering individuals toward "assistance." The end result is always, at best, an unhealthy "entanglement" and an endorsement of unconstitutional bias and discrimination.
Religious freedom can ONLY mean -- the government at arms length.