Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mike Luckovich cartoon: C'mon, Say It! (Original Post) n2doc Sep 2012 OP
I am so sick of the media using euphemisms .... Spazito Sep 2012 #1
despite what it seems, the media tries to avoid saying things they can't back up. unblock Sep 2012 #6
That is understandable IF there is a modicum of truth packaged in the statement... Spazito Sep 2012 #12
agreed. i think they're built around avoiding the term altogether, to avoid having to prove it, unblock Sep 2012 #20
Yep, they have become merely regurgitating facilitators of... Spazito Sep 2012 #37
No, to prove they lied is easy...... mrmpa Sep 2012 #23
well you're using a pretty non-standard definition of "lie". unblock Sep 2012 #24
or "misspoke"(a term that was created in the British Parliament, a body where you are not allowed Ken Burch Sep 2012 #32
i agree, well said... Spazito Sep 2012 #36
He's a liar, say it. alfredo Sep 2012 #2
I miss him. garthranzz Sep 2012 #3
He's a pants on fire liar. Say it! nt Tennessee Gal Sep 2012 #4
Is the focus of the cartoon that his pants are on fire, jerseyjack Sep 2012 #7
Both!!! ROFL! Tennessee Gal Sep 2012 #8
I like "Ryayn" -- very subtle. I would also like "Ryand". nt eppur_se_muova Sep 2012 #16
Of course the artist could also be trying to convey hemorroids...... left on green only Sep 2012 #28
Now that's a distraction BrainMann1 Sep 2012 #5
No. It's a character revelation. WinkyDink Sep 2012 #11
K & R !!! WillyT Sep 2012 #9
"It's like a sauuuna in here." "No mas pantalones." panader0 Sep 2012 #10
Yes indeed, my favorite commercial. txwhitedove Sep 2012 #13
Until that commercial... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2012 #14
Then you have always heard it wrong. Thor_MN Sep 2012 #27
I guess I have... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2012 #30
I grew up on the North Shore of Lake Superior Thor_MN Sep 2012 #34
Damn liberal media. nm rhett o rick Sep 2012 #15
"It's not our place to fact check." Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2012 #17
They call him Lyin Ryan in his home district. ErikJ Sep 2012 #18
Dude; greiner3 Sep 2012 #19
That is absolutely priceless... CBHagman Sep 2012 #21
Intellectual heft?! chervilant Sep 2012 #22
Best cartoonist I've ever seen. n/t rudycantfail Sep 2012 #25
The worst was AP's "factual shortcuts" euphemism. SunSeeker Sep 2012 #26
lol n/t Liberal_in_LA Sep 2012 #29
SAY IT!!! SAY IT!!! krispos42 Sep 2012 #31
They can't. Their owners won't allow it. DeSwiss Sep 2012 #33
"There is no Democrat who lies... er, misspeaks as much as he does! We can't report it!" ck4829 Sep 2012 #35

Spazito

(50,408 posts)
1. I am so sick of the media using euphemisms ....
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 12:58 PM
Sep 2012

like "untruths", "factually inaccurate", "misleading" for the word LIES. Luckovich nails it yet again.

unblock

(52,277 posts)
6. despite what it seems, the media tries to avoid saying things they can't back up.
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 01:22 PM
Sep 2012

this is why they love opinions and quotes. it's really easy to provide support for "many people believe man and dinosaur co-existed" or "congressman such-and-so said today that the mars is made of crude oil, gold, and diamonds".

it's easy to miss, but they actually don't often represent AS FACTS the things we hear them saying all the time.

this is why they're loathe to call someone a liar. it's not hard to prove they're saying something factually inaccurate, but to prove they LIED, you need to prove that they KNEW it was factually inaccurate and DELIBERATELY chose to express it otherwise.

that's the sort of thing that's tough even for a jury and a full-blown trial, let alone the information a mere reporter can gather. the liar can always claim to simply have been unaware that the statement was false or to have slipped up and expressed it incorrectly.

i know, it strains credulity, but this is the reason the media avoid using such terms.

Spazito

(50,408 posts)
12. That is understandable IF there is a modicum of truth packaged in the statement...
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 02:04 PM
Sep 2012

There was NO modicum of truth in Ryan's lie about the closure of the factory being the fault of President Obama. That, to me, is where the word LIE can be used without credible repercussion, imo.

There are documents showing Ryan KNEW when and who was responsible for the closure so the question of knowing it was a lie and deliberately choosing to express it anyway is NOT in question in this case and many others.

I understand the necessity to be very clear on when to use the word LIE by the media and others but, to me, it is a lack of integrity to avoid it when the facts speak for themselves.

unblock

(52,277 posts)
20. agreed. i think they're built around avoiding the term altogether, to avoid having to prove it,
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 06:17 PM
Sep 2012

even when proving it is pretty easy.


besides, they no longer view themselves as purveyors of important and relevant truth while paying reasonable respect to what both parties/candidates are saying.

they view themselves as purveyors of republican/right-wing propaganda while paying as little attention to what the democrats/left-wing are saying as they can get away with and without overtly lying themselves.

Spazito

(50,408 posts)
37. Yep, they have become merely regurgitating facilitators of...
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 01:13 PM
Sep 2012

repub/right wing talking points. It is both infuriating and sad to see, imo.

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
23. No, to prove they lied is easy......
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:43 PM
Sep 2012

what they said was not true. You don't have to prove that they knew it was factually inaccurate and they deliberately chose to express it otherwise.

Did what the man say was untrue? If the answer is yes, he LIED. I don't have to begin to dwell in the mind of the man who lied. He can justify his lies to himself. I won't make excuses for him.

unblock

(52,277 posts)
24. well you're using a pretty non-standard definition of "lie".
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:57 PM
Sep 2012

the state of mind of the speaker is the very difference between "lying" and "telling a falsehood".

personally, i think it's clear that ryan lied about his marathon time, for example. it's really hard to fathom someone running a marathon in over 4 hours and later innocently misremembering it was under 3 hours. but the media hates the possibility of being called on to prove that sort of thing.


then again, given that the media loves "opinion" so much, surely they could find a way to express the "opinion" that he lied.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
32. or "misspoke"(a term that was created in the British Parliament, a body where you are not allowed
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 02:19 AM
Sep 2012

to call any of your fellow MP's a liar during parliamentary proceedings, and which has been refined in this country to allow politicians to tell what amount to "non-lie lies". )

C'mon press people...you're not obligated to be "unbiased" and "objective" when it comes to the question of truth vs. lies.

To say that you are implies that dishonesty is now morally equivalent to honesty.

Spazito

(50,408 posts)
36. i agree, well said...
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 01:11 PM
Sep 2012

"To say that you are implies that dishonesty is now morally equivalent to honesty."

 

jerseyjack

(1,361 posts)
7. Is the focus of the cartoon that his pants are on fire,
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 01:26 PM
Sep 2012

or is the message that Ryayn is a flaming asshole?

left on green only

(1,484 posts)
28. Of course the artist could also be trying to convey hemorroids......
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:47 AM
Sep 2012

not that the 'R' man has them, but rather that he is one.


Upon edit for syntax.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
14. Until that commercial...
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 02:45 PM
Sep 2012

in my entire 44 years of life, I have never herd sauna pronounced that way.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
27. Then you have always heard it wrong.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:44 AM
Sep 2012

His overemphasis almost spoils it, but it is not the nasal SAWnah that is often heard in the US, it is SOWnah. If you were talking to one of the older Finns that I grew up around, they would make it almost three syllables, ssOWnah.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
34. I grew up on the North Shore of Lake Superior
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 08:59 AM
Sep 2012

with Laihtis, Kinnunens, Sironens, Ahos, Aunes, Leppalas, etc. I'm not Finnish myself, but I spent enough time surrounded by them to learn sauna. To say an "au" with a Finnish flair, you really dig into it as "OW", like what you say when you stub your toe and there are little kids around, but you start high, go low, go back high.

CBHagman

(16,987 posts)
21. That is absolutely priceless...
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 10:21 PM
Sep 2012

...and very welcome after literally months of media cooing and gushing about Ryan adding intellectual heft to the debate.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
33. They can't. Their owners won't allow it.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 04:07 AM
Sep 2012
``Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.`` ~ A.J. Liebling

- K&R


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mike Luckovich cartoon: C...