General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSpazito
(50,408 posts)like "untruths", "factually inaccurate", "misleading" for the word LIES. Luckovich nails it yet again.
unblock
(52,277 posts)this is why they love opinions and quotes. it's really easy to provide support for "many people believe man and dinosaur co-existed" or "congressman such-and-so said today that the mars is made of crude oil, gold, and diamonds".
it's easy to miss, but they actually don't often represent AS FACTS the things we hear them saying all the time.
this is why they're loathe to call someone a liar. it's not hard to prove they're saying something factually inaccurate, but to prove they LIED, you need to prove that they KNEW it was factually inaccurate and DELIBERATELY chose to express it otherwise.
that's the sort of thing that's tough even for a jury and a full-blown trial, let alone the information a mere reporter can gather. the liar can always claim to simply have been unaware that the statement was false or to have slipped up and expressed it incorrectly.
i know, it strains credulity, but this is the reason the media avoid using such terms.
Spazito
(50,408 posts)There was NO modicum of truth in Ryan's lie about the closure of the factory being the fault of President Obama. That, to me, is where the word LIE can be used without credible repercussion, imo.
There are documents showing Ryan KNEW when and who was responsible for the closure so the question of knowing it was a lie and deliberately choosing to express it anyway is NOT in question in this case and many others.
I understand the necessity to be very clear on when to use the word LIE by the media and others but, to me, it is a lack of integrity to avoid it when the facts speak for themselves.
unblock
(52,277 posts)even when proving it is pretty easy.
besides, they no longer view themselves as purveyors of important and relevant truth while paying reasonable respect to what both parties/candidates are saying.
they view themselves as purveyors of republican/right-wing propaganda while paying as little attention to what the democrats/left-wing are saying as they can get away with and without overtly lying themselves.
Spazito
(50,408 posts)repub/right wing talking points. It is both infuriating and sad to see, imo.
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)what they said was not true. You don't have to prove that they knew it was factually inaccurate and they deliberately chose to express it otherwise.
Did what the man say was untrue? If the answer is yes, he LIED. I don't have to begin to dwell in the mind of the man who lied. He can justify his lies to himself. I won't make excuses for him.
unblock
(52,277 posts)the state of mind of the speaker is the very difference between "lying" and "telling a falsehood".
personally, i think it's clear that ryan lied about his marathon time, for example. it's really hard to fathom someone running a marathon in over 4 hours and later innocently misremembering it was under 3 hours. but the media hates the possibility of being called on to prove that sort of thing.
then again, given that the media loves "opinion" so much, surely they could find a way to express the "opinion" that he lied.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)to call any of your fellow MP's a liar during parliamentary proceedings, and which has been refined in this country to allow politicians to tell what amount to "non-lie lies". )
C'mon press people...you're not obligated to be "unbiased" and "objective" when it comes to the question of truth vs. lies.
To say that you are implies that dishonesty is now morally equivalent to honesty.
Spazito
(50,408 posts)"To say that you are implies that dishonesty is now morally equivalent to honesty."
alfredo
(60,075 posts)garthranzz
(1,330 posts)He used to work for the Times-Picayune in New Orleans. Sigh.
Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)jerseyjack
(1,361 posts)or is the message that Ryayn is a flaming asshole?
Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,275 posts)left on green only
(1,484 posts)not that the 'R' man has them, but rather that he is one.
Upon edit for syntax.
BrainMann1
(460 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)From the Progressive insurance ad.
txwhitedove
(3,929 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)in my entire 44 years of life, I have never herd sauna pronounced that way.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)His overemphasis almost spoils it, but it is not the nasal SAWnah that is often heard in the US, it is SOWnah. If you were talking to one of the older Finns that I grew up around, they would make it almost three syllables, ssOWnah.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)I grew up in Ohio, just for a point of reference.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)with Laihtis, Kinnunens, Sironens, Ahos, Aunes, Leppalas, etc. I'm not Finnish myself, but I spent enough time surrounded by them to learn sauna. To say an "au" with a Finnish flair, you really dig into it as "OW", like what you say when you stub your toe and there are little kids around, but you start high, go low, go back high.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)I thought the flames were coming outta his ass!
CBHagman
(16,987 posts)...and very welcome after literally months of media cooing and gushing about Ryan adding intellectual heft to the debate.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)Is that like a steamin' pant load?
rudycantfail
(300 posts)SunSeeker
(51,607 posts)What does not even fucking mean?!
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/politics-elections/246721-ap-ryan-speech-took-factual-shortcuts-on-medicare
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)- K&R