Breathtaking false equivalence by Bret Stephens in the NYT "Trump's Future and the Clinton Precedent

Can Democrats and Republicans learn from the mistakes of 1998?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/opinion/trump-clinton-impeachment.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

"I came of age as a conservative in an era when Republicans were keen on matters of private virtue and public probity. Then Bill Clinton became president, and his behavior exemplified neither.

In 1998 he was impeached by a partisan G.O.P. House. But he survived the drama — and could have easily been re-elected to a third term absent the 22nd Amendment — for three reasons. His opponents overreached. The country was doing fine. And his supporters could be remarkably creative or brazen (when they weren’t simply mute) in excusing behavior they would never have tolerated from a Republican.

It’s hard not to think of that episode now that the shoe is on the other foot.

First, about the overreach: In 1998, Republicans didn’t merely oppose Clinton and his policies. They hated him, every bit as much as Democrats hate Donald Trump. Right-wing radio was then about as influential as left-wing Twitter is today, and it generated the same kind of visceral and obsessive passion."


snip

yes, a paywall - read or don't read, but just posting to show how much bullshit false equivalence the NYT Op Ed page is peddling.