Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,023 posts)
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 07:17 PM Oct 2019

Here's how Congress might try to fix Social Security this fall

When Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr., D-N.J., visited a senior living center in Englewood, New Jersey, last week, he had one main focus: Social Security reform.

Speaking to a room full of older Americans, Pascrell painted an urgent picture of what needs to happen in order to shore up the nation's insurance program.

"Social Security is not going to die in the next couple of years," Pascrell said. "But in about 10 years, it's going to have to go into the trust to pay benefits."

Social Security has $2.9 trillion in its reserves. However, with 10,000 baby boomers becoming eligible to collect retirement benefits every day, the system will face challenges in the coming years, Pascrell said.

In 2035, Social Security's combined trust funds will only be able to pay about 80% of promised benefits, according to the Social Security Administration.


-snip-

Some Washington politicians would rather wait until later and then raise the retirement age, he said. Pascrell said he sees a better way: passing a proposed bill called the Social Security 2100 Act.

-snip-

In keeping with its name, the bill aims to extend the solvency of the program into the next century. The measure also aims to give workers who are or who will be receiving benefits a raise that would equal 2% of the average benefit.

To pay for those changes, the bill would raise payroll taxes. That includes what Democrats call modest increases for all workers, increasing the rate to 7.4% of wages from 6.2% between 2020 and 2043. The bill also introduces new levies for those with wages over $400,000. Currently, only wages up to $132,900 are taxed.

-more-

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/heres-how-congress-might-try-to-fix-social-security-this-fall/ar-AAIqD6J?li=BBnb7Kz

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's how Congress might try to fix Social Security this fall (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2019 OP
Raise the amount on which SS is paid. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2019 #1
Absolutely. Easy fix. Will they do it? Hell, no. No spine. CurtEastPoint Oct 2019 #3
I'm already planning customerserviceguy Oct 2019 #6
That's part of the proposal Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2019 #4
It's half assed. Voltaire2 Oct 2019 #7
Agreed DFW Oct 2019 #10
The Republican game plan, as always, is to Voltaire2 Oct 2019 #13
Moscow Mitch won't allow a vote in his duma. PSPS Oct 2019 #2
I do not envy younger workers. I am 73 and retired. I was a SEIU member and wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #5
401Ks actually can be very good. Usually are. But that is not the problem! GulfCoast66 Oct 2019 #8
"We have got to shore up SS and make people who live only on it not live in poverty." a kennedy Oct 2019 #9
Correct. But it no longer does. GulfCoast66 Oct 2019 #12
Once again, there is no trust DeminPennswoods Oct 2019 #11

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,023 posts)
4. That's part of the proposal
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 07:39 PM
Oct 2019

From the last paragraph I posted,

The bill also introduces new levies for those with wages over $400,000. Currently, only wages up to $132,900 are taxed.

DFW

(54,403 posts)
10. Agreed
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 05:04 AM
Oct 2019

Raising the rate hurts people making $50,000 a lot more than it will hurt people making $400,000. of course, there are probably ten times as many people making $50,000 as there are people making $400,000, so it might not raise enough to keep things solvent by elimination of the cap alone. However, I think there have to be a LOT of people making bewteen $132,000 and $250,000 that could fill in a lot of the gap, although people making $250,000 in San Francisco or New York City probably live more modestly than people making $132,000 in Nebraska or Missouri.

Voltaire2

(13,061 posts)
13. The Republican game plan, as always, is to
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 11:45 AM
Oct 2019

put these poison pills into any ss reform. Look they raised your taxes!

 

wasupaloopa

(4,516 posts)
5. I do not envy younger workers. I am 73 and retired. I was a SEIU member and
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 08:06 PM
Oct 2019

have a defined benefit retirement income.

In the future I think 401Ks will not have much of a monthly payout and Soc Sec could be cut.

This needs to be talked about more and find ways for workers to put away more money.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
8. 401Ks actually can be very good. Usually are. But that is not the problem!
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 12:02 AM
Oct 2019

Like you, the wife and I have a very good defined pension along with our SS. Enough to live on well till we die. But both pale compared to our 401K.

But we have no kids and are pretty high wage earners. We could afford to put 10-15% of our already decent wages into our 401k. But few Americans can save that kind of money.

People making 60k combined with kids are not saving much for retirement. They are hardly paying the bills.

We have got to shore up SS and make people who live only on it not live in poverty.



a kennedy

(29,672 posts)
9. "We have got to shore up SS and make people who live only on it not live in poverty."
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 04:52 AM
Oct 2019

That’s the reason SS was started.....to keep seniors OUT OF POVERTY.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
12. Correct. But it no longer does.
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 08:28 AM
Oct 2019

Many people living with nothing but SS and Medicare are basically living in poverty.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
11. Once again, there is no trust
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 06:12 AM
Oct 2019

Money to pay social security benefits comes from the OASDI payments current workers pay. When more money comes in, than goes out, the "excess" money is, by law, invested in US Treasury Bills. Right now, more is coming in than going out, but there is no trust, just funds invested in treasuries. When more money goes out than comes in, the treasury bonds will have to be redeemed. When all the bonds are redeemed, whatever the difference is between income and outgo can be paid from general government revenues.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's how Congress might...