Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Plum Line (WaPo): This is the constitutional crisis we feared
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/09/this-is-constitutional-crisis-we-feared/
By Paul Waldman Opinion writer
Oct. 9, 2019 at 1:02 p.m. EDT
For nearly three years, President Trumps critics have warned that there may come a point when we face a genuine constitutional crisis, one that threatens our very Democratic system. That constitutional crisis has arrived.
The White House has released an extraordinary letter from White House Counsel Pat Cipollone to congressional Democrats, a document that will live on in infamy from this day forward as evidence of how profoundly Donald Trump corrupted the office of the president and everyone around him.
Despite the fact that it appears under the signature of the chief lawyer of the White House, the letter reads like some combination of a deeply misinformed seventh-graders social studies paper and a rant from Sean Hannity, randomly tossing around terms like civil liberties and separation of powers without any apparent understanding of what they mean.
Boiled down to its essence, the letter asserts that Trump is beyond the reach of oversight, of impeachment, and of any checks and balances from the legislative branch. Because he thinks Congress is not treating him fairly (the word fair appears eight times in the letter), Trump has decided that he can issue a blanket refusal to participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry. All requests for documents and testimony will be rejected, and all subpoenas will be thrown in the trash.
To put this in context, there are regular disputes between Congress and the executive branch over particular subpoenas or other ways Congress exercises its oversight power.
The executive rarely if ever is willing to give up everything Congress wants on the terms that Congress wants, Professor Melissa Murray of New York University Law School told me. But the usual procedure is that after some negotiation, they reach some compromise thats mutually acceptable. And when they cant, they will then go to the courts.
</snip>
By Paul Waldman Opinion writer
Oct. 9, 2019 at 1:02 p.m. EDT
For nearly three years, President Trumps critics have warned that there may come a point when we face a genuine constitutional crisis, one that threatens our very Democratic system. That constitutional crisis has arrived.
The White House has released an extraordinary letter from White House Counsel Pat Cipollone to congressional Democrats, a document that will live on in infamy from this day forward as evidence of how profoundly Donald Trump corrupted the office of the president and everyone around him.
Despite the fact that it appears under the signature of the chief lawyer of the White House, the letter reads like some combination of a deeply misinformed seventh-graders social studies paper and a rant from Sean Hannity, randomly tossing around terms like civil liberties and separation of powers without any apparent understanding of what they mean.
Boiled down to its essence, the letter asserts that Trump is beyond the reach of oversight, of impeachment, and of any checks and balances from the legislative branch. Because he thinks Congress is not treating him fairly (the word fair appears eight times in the letter), Trump has decided that he can issue a blanket refusal to participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry. All requests for documents and testimony will be rejected, and all subpoenas will be thrown in the trash.
To put this in context, there are regular disputes between Congress and the executive branch over particular subpoenas or other ways Congress exercises its oversight power.
The executive rarely if ever is willing to give up everything Congress wants on the terms that Congress wants, Professor Melissa Murray of New York University Law School told me. But the usual procedure is that after some negotiation, they reach some compromise thats mutually acceptable. And when they cant, they will then go to the courts.
</snip>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 967 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Plum Line (WaPo): This is the constitutional crisis we feared (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
Oct 2019
OP
contempt charges and lawsuits, otherwise we turning the gov't over to a strongman
Thomas Hurt
Oct 2019
#1
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)1. contempt charges and lawsuits, otherwise we turning the gov't over to a strongman
FakeNoose
(32,788 posts)2. It sounds like Chump wrote the letter himself
... which would totally fit his MO.
2naSalit
(86,822 posts)3. I think it was John Barron maybe....nt
FakeNoose
(32,788 posts)4. That would be John Barron, Esq.
... he got a law degree from Trump University, don't you know.
2naSalit
(86,822 posts)5. You know what?
I almost put the Esq. in there but thought better of it since it demeans other Esq.s