Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,234 posts)
Wed Oct 9, 2019, 07:57 PM Oct 2019

The Best Argument Against the White House Stonewalling Congress Was Made by ... Lindsey Graham

In an eight-page letter sent to congressional leaders, the White House made clear Tuesday night that it has no plans to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry House Democrats launched last month.

The letter is one of the most inaccurate, unhinged pieces of correspondence ever to bear the White House letterhead, and represents the latest nadir of the Trump administration’s campaign to spread disinformation about the president’s actions and the nature of the impeachment inquiry. Georgetown law professor Heidi Li Feldman described its contents on Twitter as a set of “totally absurd legal arguments attempting to justify what is clearly contempt of Congress.”

One of Trump’s most loyal partners in defying congressional Democrats is Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who on Wednesday told Fox News that he plans to ask Senate Republicans to sign a letter saying they do not “believe the transcript of the phone call between the president and the Ukraine is an impeachable offense,” adding that House Democrats are “about to destroy the nation for no good reason.”


?s=20

But Graham didn’t really address the letter the White House sent to congressional leaders the previous night. Ironically, he already addressed the issue when he delivered one of the most concise, effective arguments for why the White House has no choice but to comply with congressional requests for testimony and documents. The only problem is that he delivered it in 1998, well before he crawled into Trump’s pocket.

Here’s what he said:

“Article III of impeachment against Richard Nixon was based on the idea [he] failed to comply with subpoenas of Congress. Congress was going through its oversight function to provide oversight of the president. When asked for information, Richard Nixon chose not to comply and the Congress back at that time said, ‘You’re taking impeachment away from us. You’re becoming the judge and jury. It is not your job to tell us what we need. It is your job to comply with the things we need to provide oversight over you. The day Richard Nixon failed to answer that subpoena is the day that he was subject to impeachment because he took the power of Congress away from Congress and became the judge and jury.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/white-house-impeachment-inquiry-argument-lindsey-graham-896927/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Best Argument Against...