Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sat Oct 12, 2019, 04:03 PM Oct 2019

Trump's legal appeal to keep his finances hidden could be heard by Merrick Garland

Trump’s legal appeal to keep his finances hidden could be heard by Merrick Garland



https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/trumps-legal-appeal-to-keep-his-finances-hidden-could-be-heard-by-merrick-garland/

President Donald Trump was dealt a stinging blow when the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 he cannot block Congress from subpoenaing his financial records, with the lone dissenter being a judge he appointed.

The president may well appeal that decision, and one way to do that would be to request an “en banc” rehearing where the entire D.C. Circuit reviews the case. But as MSNBC’s Kendis Gibson and former prosecutor Glenn Kirschner discussed on Saturday, one of the judges who would then hear the case is a familiar name: Merrick Garland, the Supreme Court nominee who was denied a hearing by Senate Republicans so Trump could fill it with an extreme-right replacement.

“It could still take some time depending how the appellate court handles this,” said Kirschner.

“A noteworthy name at the top of that court. Isn’t there?” Gibson pressed him. “Merrick Garland.”
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's legal appeal to keep his finances hidden could be heard by Merrick Garland (Original Post) Miles Archer Oct 2019 OP
Well, my my my. nocoincidences Oct 2019 #1
I couldn't decide between Karma is a bitch, or... Frustratedlady Oct 2019 #2
He'll likely recuse, because he isn't a dick. Sad thought. librechik Oct 2019 #3
i see no reason why. twitler had nothing to do w it. mopinko Oct 2019 #5
Karma!!!! Initech Oct 2019 #4
MERRICK FUCKING GARLAND, MOTHERFUCKERS shenmue Oct 2019 #6
Could he have arguments about each and every section of tRUMP's finances... WyattKansas Oct 2019 #7

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
2. I couldn't decide between Karma is a bitch, or...
Sat Oct 12, 2019, 04:10 PM
Oct 2019

Irony gushes out of this article.

If only it were true and Merrick Garland was on the SC. What a shame.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
3. He'll likely recuse, because he isn't a dick. Sad thought.
Sat Oct 12, 2019, 04:16 PM
Oct 2019

but, yeah that would be justice, if he just ruled on the case.

WyattKansas

(1,648 posts)
7. Could he have arguments about each and every section of tRUMP's finances...
Sat Oct 12, 2019, 05:49 PM
Oct 2019

In court open and in plain view to the public before deciding at the end about every section in total with a ruling?

Seems like a clever way to keep the case on hold while releasing what should have been released already, until the damage is already done and past the point of any more fight. Boom!! That ends the delays and stalling.

Kind of like having a Supreme Court nominee being put on hold until after an election, just to remove the pick and cheat the balance of the Supreme Court.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's legal appeal to k...