General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn interesting discussion today with a Republican friend
I was intrigued that my friend volunteered that he sure hoped the Dems would pick a nominee who could beat Trump. He's never been on the nutter end of the right wing but was too conservative to vote for Hilary in 2016 although he clearly had misgivings back then.
He isn't positive that there are any Dems he or many other R's could vote for or that he thinks could win. I said I'd been intrigued and impressed by Harris and Warren so far, but I'd heard them interviewed more than any of the others.
He surprised me by saying that he thought Buttigieg seemed the most electable. He'd taken notice of the way he approached problems, said he seemed very bright, open to diverse input, and down to earth
and that he liked governors and mayors as candidates because of the executive experience.
Knowing he's Catholic I asked him if he thought Republicans could vote for a gay candidate. He said why not, what goes on in their bedroom is their private business.
I found it an encouraging conversation.
nilram
(2,888 posts)Still, glad to hear it.
NCLefty
(3,678 posts)shun the Constitution-hating, Russian-loving, multi-bankrupt criminal with zero morals?
Hillary Clinton was a CENTRIST. Your conservative friend must be on the extreme edge of his party if he couldn't stomach that over everything we already knew was wrong with Donald Trump. I also like how everything you listed he likes about Buttigieg is the utter opposite of Donald Trump.
I'm sorry but I do not feel encouraged by him being in the voting pool. Religious people who voted for Donald Trump are nearly the worst voters in America.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)likely be playing a role in his preferences. It's just reality, like gravity. Hillary had very high popularity ratings as senator and SoS, but people were already used to women in those roles.
He gives a perfectly valid rationale for experience. I also prefer governors over senators, and the electorate always has. Mayors less so, but same general idea.
In well over 200 years now, Obama's only the, what?, third to be elected from the senate to the presidency. Amazing enough that we should take note. Just as gender is still a factor that must be considered, that may also be.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,637 posts)I just finished watching a speech that Pete Buttigieg gave in Chicago either yesterday or today, and there was a Republican in the audience!
She wanted to hear what he had to say.
One voter at a time!
Celerity
(43,409 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,687 posts)Your friend voted for someone who actively subverts the integrity of our elections, wants to murder his political opponents and hangs with child rapists for fun and profit.
But he's not a nutter? ........ yes he is.
Edited because the original version could be read as attacking the poster ... not my intent.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)True Blue American
(17,986 posts)One voter at a time. Keep that in mind. Can not shut them out.
orleans
(34,060 posts)"republican friend"
i used to have one of those.
No Vested Interest
(5,167 posts)Catholics are more urban across the country than Southern conservatives and evangelical Christians, including many Afro-Americans.
Naturally, there are many exceptions both ways.
appalachiablue
(41,145 posts)Progress..
PufPuf23
(8,790 posts)the malevolent clown that makes the USA sane again.
At least may this freak show have a bottom ASAP.