General Discussion

pbmus

(12,422 posts) Sat Oct 19, 2019, 02:31 PM Oct 2019

82 impeachable offenses...

Link to tweet

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

82 impeachable offenses... (Original Post) pbmus Oct 2019 OP

K & R...for visibility...nt Wounded Bear Oct 2019 #1

K&R 2naSalit Oct 2019 #2

...and counting Blue Owl Oct 2019 #3

And he keeps doubling down on his crimes. alwaysinasnit Oct 2019 #5

Like it used to say on the Tonight Show graphic... Newest Reality Oct 2019 #4

K and R dewsgirl Oct 2019 #6

K&R smirkymonkey Oct 2019 #7

thanks and bookmarked for future yonder Oct 2019 #8

I say hit him with everything - not just 1 or 2 offenses ThoughtCriminal Oct 2019 #9

Wounded Bear

(58,670 posts)

1. K & R...for visibility...nt

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 02:32 PM

Oct 2019

2naSalit

(86,647 posts)

2. K&R

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 02:32 PM

Oct 2019

Blue Owl

(50,427 posts)

3. ...and counting

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 02:33 PM

Oct 2019

n/t

alwaysinasnit

(5,066 posts)

5. And he keeps doubling down on his crimes.

Reply to Blue Owl (Reply #3)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 02:35 PM

Oct 2019

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)

4. Like it used to say on the Tonight Show graphic...

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 02:34 PM

Oct 2019

More to come!

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)

6. K and R

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 02:37 PM

Oct 2019

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)

7. K&R

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 02:41 PM

Oct 2019

and bookmarked.

Lock him up!

yonder

(9,667 posts)

8. thanks and bookmarked for future

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 03:25 PM

Oct 2019

ThoughtCriminal

(14,047 posts)

9. I say hit him with everything - not just 1 or 2 offenses

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Sat Oct 19, 2019, 04:32 PM

Oct 2019

Not just to sandbag, but Rule of Law. No more enabling. No more tolerance for corruption.

And when we're done, lock him up.

Reply to this discussion