General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfter years of front-page articles about HRC's emails, NYT publishes her exoneration on page 16.
Link to tweet
Baitball Blogger
(46,753 posts)OnDoutside
(19,965 posts)abqtommy
(14,118 posts)I don't like their ballyhoo.
I don't read the NYT
And I don't go with the girls that do!
djacq
(1,634 posts)rickyhall
(4,889 posts)betsuni
(25,582 posts)Lonestarblue
(10,038 posts)Are they still doing that, and if so why isnt the NYT doing an article on it. What still irritates me is the Times focus on Hillarys emails without setting any context of how many people in government have misused private emails. For example, Karl Rove and crew housed private email on the RNC servers prior to the run-up to the Iraq War. Rather than turn them over, they deleted them and nothing was ever done. Those emails would have shed light on what turned out to be a very bad decision, but Republicans deleted millions of classified messages.
The Times may have a few liberal opinion writers, but they also publish a lot of right-wing opinions, including pieces that they know are absolute garbage by people like the author of Clinton Cash. The myth of liberal media is just thata total myth.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)You had to read for a few paragraphs to find out that she was cleared, or that some emails were classified AFTER...
uncle ray
(3,157 posts)quite a difference between the two.