Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Mon Oct 21, 2019, 10:44 AM Oct 2019

Investigating the investigators of the investigators...

Would that be wrong? Would that be treasonous?

Where would it be different from just investigating the investigators? Does there have to be a reason or some evidence to recommend an investigation, other than just a conspiracy theory?

To question the legitimacy of an official investigation without credible evidence seems almost treasonous? To search for a DNC server in Ukraine without any evidence is a prime example. To investigate political opponents with foreign proxies seems to be another example?

Just what are Mssrs. Barr and Duncan doing in the investigation, that they are doing at the request of Donald Trump? Are they credible? Are they legitimate? Are they treasonous?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Investigating the investigators of the investigators... (Original Post) kentuck Oct 2019 OP
I can accurately state that Bolshevik Barr and Drunken Duncan are abqtommy Oct 2019 #1
They are traitors ... GeorgeGist Oct 2019 #2
Seriously... kentuck Oct 2019 #3

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
1. I can accurately state that Bolshevik Barr and Drunken Duncan are
Mon Oct 21, 2019, 12:40 PM
Oct 2019

credibly and legitimately treasonous.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Investigating the investi...