General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIndicted Giuliani Henchman Lev Parnas Raises Executive Privilege in Federal Court
Lev Parnas, a Soviet-born business associate with ties to Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trumps personal lawyer, raised the issue of executive privilege during a court proceeding Wednesday, arguing it could apply to some of the evidence gathered in his campaign-finance case in New York.
The issue was raised during an arraignment for Parnas and Igor Furman, who pleaded not guilty on Wednesday to charges in a four-count indictment that accused them of funneling money through straw donors into U.S. elections in an effort to gain influence. Prosecutors also allege the pair petitioned U.S. politicians, including a congressman, to have the ambassador to Ukraine removed from her post.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebekah Donaleski, offered a glimpse into the voluminous evidence that prosecutors have recovered so far on the two men who have become figures in the Trump impeachment proceedings, through dozens of search warrants, property searches, and subpoenas. The information includes emails and social media accounts and financial records from more than 50 bank accounts.
During the hearing, Parnas attorney, Edward MacMahon, told the judge that his client was told to invoke executive privilege in a letter that was submitted on Parnas behalf by John Dowd, a former lawyer for the president, to a congressional committee conducting the impeachment inquiry.
https://news.yahoo.com/giuliani-henchmen-lev-parnas-igor-180928108.html
"You can't use that evidence against me because I'm two degrees of separation from Trump" doesn't strike me as a particularly compelling argument.
Botany
(70,516 posts)Then executive privilege argument is moot.
gab13by13
(21,359 posts)to call for executive privilege?
Let Trump go on TV and claim executive privilege for a mobster.
Democrats and the media should ask Trump about this one.
mercuryblues
(14,532 posts)According to the indictment they were charged with USA campaign finance law violations. Nothing to do with the Ukraine folly. How can they get a letter from Dowd claiming executive privilege, when trump claims he doesn't know them?
It was nice of Their lawyer and John Dowd to admit in court that they have information about trump's involvement in the Ukraine follies.
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)the gist of it.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)bdamomma
(63,872 posts)sorry not for you, boy they have balls don't they?